World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
36072
World Ranking
13463
National Ranking
1255

Stephen Campbell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Campbell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen Campbell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Campbell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen Campbell is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research principally spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with 103 and 71 publications respectively. Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as General Health Professions, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly output covers several main topics including Antibiotic Use and Resistance, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, Patient Safety and Medication Errors, Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues, Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life.

Stephen Campbell has published several recent papers, including:

  • Evaluating the Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutation D614G on Transmissibility and Pathogenicity (2020) in Cell
  • Diagnosis of physical and mental health conditions in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study (2020) in The Lancet Public Health
  • Strategies to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization with a Special Focus on Developing Countries (2021) in Life
  • Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) in BMC Medicine
  • Response to the Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Across Africa: Successes, Challenges, and Implications for the Future (2020) in Frontiers in Pharmacology

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, among whom the most frequent are Brian Godman, Johanna C. Meyer, Amanj Kurdi, Natalie Schellack, and Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia. Their cooperative work has been published in various venues, with recurring contributions to BMJ Open, UNC Libraries, Antibiotics, Advances in Human Biology, and Frontiers in Tropical Diseases.

Stephen Campbell has also contributed to book publications through Cornell University Press eBooks, having two editions of "Along the Integral Margin" published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Increasing Prevalence of Overweight Among US Adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991

    Robert J. Kuczmarski;Katherine M. Flegal;Stephen M. Campbell;Clifford L. Johnson

  • Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care

    S.M. Campbell;J.C.C. Braspenning;A. Hutchinson;M.N. Marshall

  • Overweight Prevalence and Trends for Children and Adolescents: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1963 to 1991

    Richard P. Troiano;Katherine M. Flegal;Robert J. Kuczmarski;Stephen M. Campbell

  • Defining quality of care

    S.M Campbell;M.O Roland;S.A Buetow

  • PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews

    Abigail M Methley;Stephen Campbell;Carolyn Chew-Graham;Rosalind McNally

  • Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England

    Stephen M. Campbell;David Reeves;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Bonnie Sibbald

  • The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

    Anna M. Kucharska-Newton;Keri L. Monda;Stephen Campbell;Patrick T. Bradshaw

  • Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Kanza Khan;Richard N Keers;Aseel Abuzour

  • Measuring quality of life

    Meriel E M Jenney;Stephen Campbell

  • The influence of smoking cessation on the prevalence of overweight in the United States.

    Katherine M. Flegal;Richard P. Troiano;Elsie R. Pamuk;Robert J. Kuczmarski

  • Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study.

    S. M. Campbell;M. Hann;J. Hacker;C. Burns

  • Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance

    Stephen Campbell;David Reeves;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Elizabeth Middleton

  • Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study

    Bower Pj;Campbell S;Bojke C;B S Sibbald

  • Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

    Tim Doran;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Jose M Valderas;Stephen Campbell

  • Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand

    M E Seddon;M N Marshall;S M Campbell;M O Roland

  • Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care

    Steve Goodacre;Jon Nicholl;Simon Dixon;Elizabeth Cross

  • Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study

    Stephen M Campbell;Judy A Cantrill;Dave Roberts

  • Consensus methods in prescribing research.

    S. M. Campbell;J. A. Cantrill

  • Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study.

    Ruth McDonald;Stephen Harrison;Kath Checkland;Stephen M Campbell

  • Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study

    Stephen M Campbell;Martin O Roland;Elizabeth Middleton;David Reeves

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Roland
Martin Roland University of Cambridge
Brian Godman
Brian Godman University of Strathclyde
Michel Wensing
Michel Wensing Heidelberg University
Cassandra Szoeke
Cassandra Szoeke University of Melbourne
Caroline Sanders
Caroline Sanders University of Manchester
Anne Rogers
Anne Rogers University of Southampton
Richard Grol
Richard Grol Radboud University
Ruth McDonald
Ruth McDonald University of Manchester
Paul G. Shekelle
Paul G. Shekelle RAND Corporation
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to various related fields and advanced degrees. For students seeking flexibility, online healthcare administration programs are a popular choice. These courses prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics while accommodating busy schedules.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. The most affordable mha programs offer an accessible pathway for those aiming to develop management expertise without incurring excessive debt. These programs emphasize budgeting, human resources, and policy in the healthcare setting.

For nurses aspiring to top clinical roles, finding the cheapest dnp program can help balance career advancement and finances. DNP programs train students for advanced practice, leadership positions, and evidence-based care.

Lastly, pharmacists and pharmacy students should note the growing accessibility of degrees like the online pharmd. These online doctorate options allow current professionals to earn advanced credentials and expand into new pharmacy roles, all with greater flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles