World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8416 7859 566 532 78 9890
Neuroscience 39 8224 7594 481 439 86 9934

Asaf Gilboa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Asaf Gilboa between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Asaf Gilboa published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2022. 11 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2022. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Asaf Gilboa: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 5
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 7
2015 3
2016 4
2017 6
2018 3
2019 5
2020 2
2021 7
2022 9
2023 8
2024 6
2025 5
Total 95
Download as CSV

Asaf Gilboa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asaf Gilboa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 86
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Asaf Gilboa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asaf Gilboa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Asaf Gilboa is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed to the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. Their work spans several subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, as well as Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research centers on topics such as Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Memory Processes and Influences, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and the Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism.

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Asaf Gilboa include the following:

  • No consolidation without representation: Correspondence between neural and psychological representations in recent and remote memory, 2021, Neuron
  • Precuneus stimulation alters the neural dynamics of autobiographical memory retrieval, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Effects of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome on the functional brain networks of non-hospitalized individuals, 2023, Frontiers in Neurology
  • The structure of prior knowledge enhances memory in experts by reducing interference, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • MRI Assessment of Cerebral Blood Flow in Nonhospitalized Adults Who Self-Isolated Due to COVID-19, 2022, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Frequent coauthors of Gilboa include Eugenie Roudaia, Allison B. Sekuler, Xiang Ji, Benjamin Lam, and Chris Heyn.

Publications by Gilboa appear predominantly in venues such as Neuropsychologia, Neurology, Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, and Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory

    Morris Moscovitch;R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Asaf Gilboa;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis

  • The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory.

    Morris Moscovitch;Lynn Nadel;Gordon Winocur;Asaf Gilboa

  • Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory.

    Asaf Gilboa;Asaf Gilboa;Hannah Marlatte

  • What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature.

    Vanessa E. Ghosh;Asaf Gilboa

  • Longitudinal MRI study of hippocampal volume in trauma survivors with PTSD.

    Omer Bonne;Dalia Brandes;Asaf Gilboa;J. Moshe Gomori

  • Remembering Our Past: Functional Neuroanatomy of Recollection of Recent and Very Remote Personal Events

    Asaf Gilboa;Gordon Winocur;Cheryl L. Grady;Stephanie J. Hevenor

  • Autobiographical and episodic memory--one and the same? Evidence from prefrontal activation in neuroimaging studies.

    Asaf Gilboa

  • Functional connectivity of the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala in posttraumatic stress disorder

    Asaf Gilboa;Arieh Y Shalev;Lucian Laor;Hava Lester

  • Mechanisms of spontaneous confabulations: a strategic retrieval account

    Asaf Gilboa;Claude Alain;Donald T. Stuss;Brenda Melo

  • Rapid neocortical acquisition of long-term arbitrary associations independent of the hippocampus

    Tali Sharon;Morris Moscovitch;Asaf Gilboa

  • Amnesia as an impairment of detail generation and binding: Evidence from personal, fictional, and semantic narratives in K.C.

    R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Asaf Gilboa;Brian Levine;Gordon Winocur;Gordon Winocur

  • Cerebral blood flow in chronic symptomatic mild traumatic brain injury

    Omer Bonne;Asaf Gilboa;Yoram Louzoun;Orli Kempf-Sherf

  • Resting regional cerebral perfusion in recent posttraumatic stress disorder

    Omer Bonne;Asaf Gilboa;Yoram Louzoun;Dalia Brandes

  • Common and unique neural correlates of autobiographical memory and theory of mind

    Jennifer S. Rabin;Asaf Gilboa;Donald T. Stuss;Raymond A. Mar

  • Schema Representation in Patients with Ventromedial PFC Lesions

    Vanessa E. Ghosh;Vanessa E. Ghosh;Morris Moscovitch;Morris Moscovitch;Brenda Melo Colella;Asaf Gilboa;Asaf Gilboa

  • Retrieval of autobiographical memory in Alzheimer's disease: Relation to volumes of medial temporal lobe and other structures

    Asaf Gilboa;Joel Ramirez;Stefan Köhler;Robyn Westmacott

  • The Human Dentate Gyrus Plays a Necessary Role in Discriminating New Memories

    Stevenson Baker;Paula Vieweg;Fuqiang Gao;Asaf Gilboa

  • No consolidation without representation: Correspondence between neural and psychological representations in recent and remote memory.

    Asaf Gilboa;Morris Moscovitch

  • Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia

    Asaf Gilboa;Gordon Winocur;Gordon Winocur;R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Amir Poreh

  • The precuneus and hippocampus contribute to individual differences in the unfolding of spatial representations during episodic autobiographical memory.

    Melissa Hebscher;Brian Levine;Asaf Gilboa;Asaf Gilboa

Frequent Co-Authors

Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
R. Shayna Rosenbaum
R. Shayna Rosenbaum York University
Gordon Winocur
Gordon Winocur University of Toronto
Donald T. Stuss
Donald T. Stuss University of Toronto
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Stefan Köhler
Stefan Köhler University of Western Ontario
Omer Bonne
Omer Bonne Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Brian Levine
Brian Levine University of Toronto
Cheryl L. Grady
Cheryl L. Grady University of Toronto
Donna Rose Addis
Donna Rose Addis University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of career paths in healthcare, research, and mental health services. Many students are interested in complementary or related fields, such as counseling or psychology, which can be pursued conveniently through online programs. These options not only broaden your expertise but also enhance employability in multidisciplinary healthcare teams.

For those exploring clinical roles, it’s important to choose programs with strong accreditation. If you are seeking professional counseling certification, cacrep accredited online counseling programs ensure you meet recognized standards in educational quality.

Affordability is often a key concern for students. You might want to consider the cheapest online master's in counseling, as well as programs focused on family dynamics such as a marriage and family therapy degree online.

If you are interested in research, assessment, or behavioral science, a psychology degree could be a great fit. Explore the cheapest online master's in psychology to find options that align with your academic and financial goals.

Best Scientists Citing Asaf Gilboa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles