World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
18026
World Ranking
3265
National Ranking
1575

Mathematics

D-Index
44
Citations
16855
World Ranking
1527
National Ranking
658

Tenko Raykov publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tenko Raykov sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 219 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Tenko Raykov D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tenko Raykov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tenko Raykov is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychometric methodologies, statistical methods, and advanced statistical modeling techniques within the broader fields of decision sciences and mathematics.

The main subfields of study in their work include statistics and probability, management science and operations research, and computer networks and communications. Additional areas of research interest span statistics, probability and uncertainty, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

The most frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Educational and Psychological Measurement
  • Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
  • Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
  • UNC Libraries
  • Quality & Quantity

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments," 2021, Educational and Psychological Measurement
  • "Examining Multidimensional Measuring Instruments for Proximity to Unidimensional Structure Using Latent Variable Modeling," 2020, Educational and Psychological Measurement
  • "On the Importance of Coefficient Alpha for Measurement Research: Loading Equality Is Not Necessary for Alpha's Utility as a Scale Reliability Index," 2022, Educational and Psychological Measurement
  • "Evaluating Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha and Testing Its Identity to Scale Reliability: A Direct Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis Procedure," 2024, Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
  • "Model Selection and Average Proportion Explained Variance in Exploratory Factor Analysis," 2020, Educational and Psychological Measurement

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Tenko Raykov include:

  • George A. Marcoulides
  • Christine DiStefano
  • Natalja Menold
  • Martin Pusic
  • Lisa Calvocoressi

Their primary research topics involve psychometric methodologies and testing, statistical methods and Bayesian inference, behavioral and psychological studies, optimal experimental design methods, social and intergroup psychology, and mental health research topics.

Best Publications

  • A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures.

    Tenko Raykov

  • Introduction to Psychometric Theory

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • Scale Reliability, Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, and Violations of Essential Tau-Equivalence with Fixed Congeneric Components.

    Tenko Raykov

  • Coefficient Alpha and Composite Reliability with Interrelated Nonhomogeneous Items.

    Tenko Raykov

  • Evaluation of Variance Inflation Factors in Regression Models Using Latent Variable Modeling Methods

    Katerina M. Marcoulides;Tenko Raykov

  • Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: some proposed guidelines.

    Tenko Raykov;Adrian Tomer;John R. Nesselroade

  • Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints.

    Tenko Raykov

  • Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling

    Tenko Raykov

  • Bias of Coefficient afor Fixed Congeneric Measures with Correlated Errors

    Tenko Raykov

  • Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach

    Tenko Raykov;Patrick E. Shrout

  • Using the Delta Method for Approximate Interval Estimation of Parameter Functions in SEM

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • Evaluation of Scale Reliability for Unidimensional Measures Using Latent Variable Modeling

    Tenko Raykov

  • Analysis of Longitudinal Studies With Missing Data Using Covariance Structure Modeling With Full-Information Maximum Likelihood.

    Tenko Raykov

  • Issues in applied structural equation modeling research

    Tenko Raykov;Keith F. Widaman

  • Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We Still Need You!.

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • Determinants of different aspects of everyday outcome in schizophrenia: The roles of negative symptoms, cognition, and functional capacity.

    Martin T. Strassnig;Tenko Raykov;Cedric O'Gorman;Christopher R. Bowie

  • On Multilevel Model Reliability Estimation From the Perspective of Structural Equation Modeling

    Tenko Raykov;George A. Marcoulides

  • Validating the measurement of real-world functional outcomes: phase I results of the VALERO study.

    Philip D. Harvey;Tenko Raykov;Elizabeth W. Twamley;Lea Vella

  • On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research

    Tenko Raykov

Frequent Co-Authors

George A. Marcoulides
George A. Marcoulides University of California, Santa Barbara
Philip D. Harvey
Philip D. Harvey University of Miami
Philip B. Gorelick
Philip B. Gorelick Northwestern University
Anna Zajacova
Anna Zajacova University of Western Ontario
Peter M. Bentler
Peter M. Bentler University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas L. Patterson
Thomas L. Patterson University of California, San Diego
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Elizabeth W. Twamley
Elizabeth W. Twamley University of California, San Diego
Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Amy E. Pinkham
Amy E. Pinkham The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, expanding into related fields like business and data science can enhance career prospects. Many professionals pursue an one year MBA program to quickly gain managerial skills and apply quantitative reasoning in leadership roles.

Flexibility is key for working individuals, which makes an online MBA program that accept transfer credits an attractive option. This approach allows learners to transfer previous credits and complete their degrees at an efficient pace.

For those focused on analytics and big data, pursuing an MS in Data Analytics provides a strong foundation in interpreting complex datasets—a natural complement to mathematical expertise.

Additionally, students seeking accessible entry points might explore some of the MBA programs easy to get into, which offer valuable business education without stringent admission hurdles. Combining these pathways with a solid math background can open up diverse and rewarding career options.

Best Scientists Citing Tenko Raykov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles