World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10249 9620 5269 4868 514 56039

Philip B. Gorelick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip B. Gorelick between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip B. Gorelick published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2014. 21 of the 560 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2014. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 18 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 3 publications
1980 2026

560 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip B. Gorelick: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 18
1988 5
1989 6
1990 4
1991 10
1992 8
1993 9
1994 8
1995 6
1996 5
1997 4
1998 10
1999 17
2000 9
2001 8
2002 14
2003 17
2004 17
2005 14
2006 11
2007 10
2008 20
2009 16
2010 22
2011 20
2012 20
2013 17
2014 25
2015 19
2016 23
2017 8
2018 13
2019 21
2020 24
2021 20
2022 11
2023 16
2024 19
2025 18
2026 3
Total 560
Download as CSV

Philip B. Gorelick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. Gorelick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 514 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 514
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip B. Gorelick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip B. Gorelick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip B. Gorelick is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several key subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of major topics relevant to cerebrovascular health and related conditions. These include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Several recent publications highlight their involvement in research addressing neurological and cardiovascular health. Notable papers include:

  • "Tackling challenges in care of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias amid the COVID-19 pandemic, now and in the future" (2020, Alzheimer s & Dementia)
  • "Neurologic deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack" (2020, Neurology)
  • "What Is the Best Mix of Population-Wide and High-Risk Targeted Strategies of Primary Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention?" (2020, Journal of the American Heart Association)
  • "Cardiac Contributions to Brain Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association" (2024, Stroke)
  • "Characteristics of a Diverse Cohort of Stroke Patients with SARS-CoV-2 and Outcome by Sex" (2020, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases)

Their frequent co-authors suggest a collaborative research network centered around stroke and cardiovascular medicine. Collaborators with multiple joint publications include Hee-Joon Bae, Juneyoung Lee, Beom Joon Kim, Ji Sung Lee, and Jong-Moo Park.

Publication venues that regularly feature their work emphasize neurology, stroke, and cardiovascular health research. These venues include Stroke, Neurology, Journal of the American Heart Association, Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior, and Clinics in Geriatric Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Philip B. Gorelick;Angelo Scuteri;Sandra E. Black;Charles Decarli

  • Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2006 Update A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee

    Thomas Thom;Nancy Haase;Wayne Rosamond

  • Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic Attack : A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke : Co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention : The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline

    Ralph L. Sacco;Robert Adams;Greg Albers;Mark J. Alberts

  • Vascular Cognitive Impairment

    John T O'Brien;Timo Erkinjuntti;Barry Reisberg;Gustavo Roman

  • Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.

    Larry B. Goldstein;Robert Adams;Mark J. Alberts;Lawrence J. Appel

  • Primary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association

    Larry B. Goldstein;Robert Adams;Kyra Becker;Curt D. Furberg

  • Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke

    Ralph L. Sacco;Hans-Christoph Diener;Salim Yusuf;Daniel Cotton

  • Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association's Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems.

    Lee H. Schwamm;Arthur Pancioli;Joe E. Acker;Larry B. Goldstein

  • Telmisartan to prevent recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events.

    Salim Yusuf;Salim Yusuf;Hans-Christoph Diener;Ralph L. Sacco;Daniel Cotton

  • Update to the AHA/ASA Recommendations for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

    Robert J. Adams;Greg Albers;Mark J. Alberts;Oscar Benavente

  • Use of aspirin to reduce risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease (ARRIVE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    J Michael Gaziano;J Michael Gaziano;J Michael Gaziano;Carlos Brotons;Rosa Coppolecchia;Claudio Cricelli

  • Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout

    William B. White;Kenneth G. Saag;Michael A. Becker;Jeffrey S. Borer

  • Large Artery Intracranial Occlusive Disease. A Large Worldwide Burden but a Relatively Neglected Frontier

    Philip B. Gorelick;Ka Sing Wong;Hee Joon Bae;Dilip K. Pandey

  • Race, sex and occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a review.

    L R Caplan;P B Gorelick;D B Hier

  • Impact of Hypertension on Cognitive Function: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Costantino Iadecola;Kristine Yaffe;José Biller;Lisa C. Bratzke

  • Prevention of a first stroke: a review of guidelines and a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the National Stroke Association.

    Philip B. Gorelick;Ralph L. Sacco;Don B. Smith;Mark Alberts

  • The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling.

    Philip B Gorelick

  • Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    Ralph L. Sacco;Robert Adams;Greg Albers;Mark J. Alberts

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph L. Sacco
Ralph L. Sacco University of Miami
Larry B. Goldstein
Larry B. Goldstein University of Kentucky
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Mitchell S.V. Elkind
Mitchell S.V. Elkind Columbia University
Scott E. Kasner
Scott E. Kasner University of Pennsylvania
Louis R. Caplan
Louis R. Caplan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Colin P. Derdeyn
Colin P. Derdeyn University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Karen L. Furie
Karen L. Furie Brown University
Philip M.W. Bath
Philip M.W. Bath University of Nottingham
Muhammad Farooq
Muhammad Farooq Sultan Qaboos University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees can open doors to rewarding and flexible medical careers beyond traditional MD programs. For nursing professionals, online doctoral programs offer accelerated options such as the fastest dnp online program, letting students achieve high-level expertise with greater speed and convenience.

Those seeking an even quicker pathway may consider a 1 year dnp program online, which allows qualified nurses to advance in their field within a shorter timeframe. Additionally, aspiring nurses interested in entering the workforce sooner can look into the fastest lpn program, perfect for those wanting a foundational nursing role.

Mental health is another vital area, and specialized degrees such as online msn pmhnp programs prepare graduates to become psychiatric nurse practitioners. These flexible online tracks enable students to balance work and study while meeting the demand for skilled healthcare providers in various settings.

Best Scientists Citing Philip B. Gorelick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles