World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
35870
World Ranking
12983
National Ranking
6636

Steven L. Wolf publications per year

1970: 1 publications 1971: 1 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
1970 2025

338 publications in total across all disciplines

Steven L. Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven L. Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven L. Wolf is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their primary fields of study encompass Medicine and Neuroscience, with a concentration in subfields such as Neurology, Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Epidemiology.

Their research extensively covers topics including Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven L. Wolf include the following:

  • Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial, 2021, The Lancet
  • Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for chronic post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a phase I trial, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Biofeedback for Post-stroke Gait Retraining: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Directions in the Context of Emerging Technologies, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Patient-Specific, Voice-Controlled, Robotic FLEXotendon Glove-II System for Spinal Cord Injury, 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Association of Brain Age, Lesion Volume, and Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke, 2023, Neurology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with this researcher include:

  • Steven C. Cramer (15 co-authored works)
  • Wuwei Feng (11 co-authored works)
  • Carolee J. Winstein (9 co-authored works)
  • Steven A. Kautz (8 co-authored works)
  • Teresa J. Kimberley (7 co-authored works)

Steven L. Wolf has contributed to numerous publications in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair (6 publications)
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (6 publications)
  • Stroke (6 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (6 publications)
  • Neurology (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.

    Steven L. Wolf;Carolee J. Winstein;J. Philip Miller;Edward Taub

  • The Effects of Exercise on Falls in Elderly Patients: A Preplanned Meta-analysis of the FICSIT Trials

    M A Province;E C Hadley;M C Hornbrook;L A Lipsitz

  • Reducing Frailty and Falls in Older Persons: An Investigation of Tai Chi and Computerized Balance Training

    Steven L. Wolf;Huiman X. Barnhart;Nancy G. Kutner;Elizabeth McNeely

  • Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce:

    Julie Bernhardt;Kathryn S Hayward;Kathryn S Hayward;Gert Kwakkel;Gert Kwakkel;Nick S Ward

  • Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients.

    Steven L. Wolf;Deborah E. Lecraw;Lisa A. Barton;Brigitte B. Jann

  • Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke

    Steven L. Wolf;Pamela A. Catlin;Michael Ellis;Audrey Link Archer

  • What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke?

    Mindy F. Levin;Jeffrey A. Kleim;Steven L. Wolf

  • Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

    Gert Kwakkel;Natasha A. Lannin;Karen Borschmann;Coralie English

  • Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

    Gert Kwakkel;Janne M Veerbeek;Erwin E H van Wegen;Steven L Wolf

  • Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS) A single-center RCT

    A. W. Dromerick;C. E. Lang;R. L. Birkenmeier;J. M. Wagner;J. M. Wagner

  • The Effect of Tai Chi Quan and Computerized Balance Training on Postural Stability in Older Subjects

    Steven L Wolf;Huiman X Barnhart;Gary L Ellison;Carol E Coogler

  • Development of the common data base for the FICSIT trials

    D. M. Buchner;M. C. Hornbrook;N. G. Kutner;M. E. Tinetti

  • Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review:

    Susan Barreca;Steven L. Wolf;Susan Fasoli;Richard Bohannon

  • Intense tai chi exercise training and fall occurrences in older, transitionally frail adults: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Steven L. Wolf;Richard W. Sattin;Michael Kutner;Michael O'Grady

  • Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial

    Steven L Wolf;Carolee J Winstein;J Phillip Miller;Paul A Thompson

  • Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial.

    Jeanne R Charles;Steven L Wolf;Jennifer A Schneider;Andrew M Gordon

  • Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation.

    He Huang;Steven L Wolf;Jiping He;Jiping He

  • Associations of demographic, functional, and behavioral characteristics with activity-related fear of falling among older adults transitioning to frailty.

    Reto W. Kressig;Steven L. Wolf;Richard Warren Sattin;Michael O'Grady

  • A Cross-sectional Validation Study of the FICSIT Common Data Base Static Balance Measures

    Jane E. Rossiter-Fornoff;Steven L. Wolf;Leslie I. Wolfson;David M. Buchner

  • Constraint Induced Movement Techniques To Facilitate Upper Extremity Use in Stroke Patients.

    Edward Taub;Steven L. Wolf

Frequent Co-Authors

Carolee J. Winstein
Carolee J. Winstein University of Southern California
Steven C. Cramer
Steven C. Cramer University of California, Los Angeles
Edward Taub
Edward Taub University of Alabama at Birmingham
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Gert Kwakkel
Gert Kwakkel University of Amsterdam
Nick S. Ward
Nick S. Ward University College London
Dale Corbett
Dale Corbett University of Ottawa
Lara A. Boyd
Lara A. Boyd University of British Columbia
Nicolas Schweighofer
Nicolas Schweighofer University of Southern California
George F. Wittenberg
George F. Wittenberg University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always start with a traditional MD. Many rewarding and in-demand healthcare roles can be pursued through flexible online programs. For example, a health information management bachelor degree online equips students with valuable skills in managing patient data and healthcare technology, opening doors to growing careers in healthcare administration.

Shorter certification paths such as medical billing and coding online provide quick entry into the medical field, preparing graduates for essential roles in hospitals and clinics. For aspiring nurses, online education offers both value and flexibility. You can find the cheapest np programs online for those ready to advance from RN to nurse practitioner and take on greater responsibility in patient care.

Entry-level and advanced nursing degrees are accessible as well. Many choose the cheapest online nursing programs to get started or to progress in their healthcare career without incurring heavy student debt. These online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and access to healthcare careers beyond medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Steven L. Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles