World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
134
Citations
66280
World Ranking
2152
National Ranking
82

Eric E. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 783 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Eric E. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric E. Smith is a researcher affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada, specializing in Medicine with a significant focus on Neurology and related subfields. Their research contributions span multiple areas including Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Smith has contributed to a number of significant recent publications, including:

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013 (2023, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (2020, The Lancet)
  • The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Cognitive Impairment After Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2023, Stroke)
  • Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia)

Frequent co-authors with whom Smith has collaborated include:

  • Zahinoor Ismail
  • Lee H. Schwamm
  • Gregg C. Fonarow
  • Ying Xian
  • Michael D. Hill

Smith's work has been published extensively in several venues, with notable numbers of publications in:

  • Stroke (86 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (75 publications)
  • Neurology (30 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (27 publications)
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (22 publications)

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Variants conferring risk of atrial fibrillation on chromosome 4q25

    Daniel F Gudbjartsson;David O Arnar;Anna Helgadottir;Solveig Gretarsdottir

  • Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Gregg C. Fonarow;Eric E. Smith;Mathew J. Reeves

  • 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards)

    Karen A. Hicks;James E. Tcheng;Biykem Bozkurt;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality A Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Daniel T. Lackland;Edward J. Roccella;Anne F. Deutsch;Myriam Fornage

  • Immune activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    Tobias Liebregts;Birgit Adam;Christoph Bredack;Alexander Röth

  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: Provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment

    Zahinoor Ismail;Eric E. Smith;Yonas Geda;David Sultzer

  • Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Bart M. Demaerschalk;Dawn O. Kleindorfer;Opeolu M. Adeoye;Andrew M. Demchuk

  • Timeliness of Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Characteristics, Hospital Factors, and Outcomes Associated With Door-to-Needle Times Within 60 Minutes

    Gregg C. Fonarow;Eric E. Smith;Jeffrey L. Saver;Mathew J. Reeves

  • Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease

    Melanie D. Sweeney;Axel Montagne;Abhay P. Sagare;Daniel A. Nation

  • An autocrine TGF-β/ZEB/miR-200 signaling network regulates establishment and maintenance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition

    Philip A. Gregory;Cameron P. Bracken;Cameron P. Bracken;Eric Smith;Andrew G. Bert

  • Warfarin and Aspirin in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

    Shunichi Homma;John L.P. Thompson;Patrick M. Pullicino;Bruce Levin

  • Door-to-Needle Times for Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Before and After a Quality Improvement Initiative

    Gregg C. Fonarow;Xin Zhao;Eric E. Smith;Jeffrey L. Saver

  • Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    Lee H. Schwamm;Gregg C. Fonarow;Mathew J. Reeves;Wenqin Pan

  • Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: Relationship with patient outcomes

    D. Dowlatshahi;A.M. Demchuk;M.L. Flaherty;M. Ali

  • A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System

    Hakan Ay;Thomas Benner;E. Murat Arsava;Karen L. Furie

  • Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Richard E. Wolfe;Richard B. Moore;Eric Smith

  • Hemorrhage Burden Predicts Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Lobar Hemorrhage

    Steven M. Greenberg;Jessica A. Eng;MingMing Ning;Eric E. Smith

  • Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the Boston criteria.

    Eric E. Smith;Steven M. Greenberg

  • Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    D Lackland;E Roccella;Anne Deutsch;M Fornage

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee H. Schwamm
Lee H. Schwamm Harvard University
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Mathew J. Reeves
Mathew J. Reeves Michigan State University
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Steven M. Greenberg
Steven M. Greenberg Harvard University
Jonathan Rosand
Jonathan Rosand Harvard University
Zahinoor Ismail
Zahinoor Ismail University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical careers beyond traditional Medical School in the USA, there are several flexible online degree options worth considering. Many students are drawn to pharmacy school online accredited programs, which allow you to pursue a pharmacy degree with the flexibility of online classes while meeting nationwide accreditation standards.

Another growing field is health information management. Those seeking a specialty in health data and records management can explore rhia certification programs online for convenient and affordable study options.

For those looking for fast entry into healthcare administration, affordable medical billing and coding programs provide training that prepares you for certification and remote work possibilities in a high-demand field.

Finally, if advanced nursing is of interest, the most affordable nurse practitioner programs online offer flexible paths to becoming a licensed advanced practice nurse. These career pathways offer alternatives for those seeking flexibility, affordability, and strong job prospects in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Eric E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles