World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 134 2152 2004 82 78 783 66280

Eric E. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric E. Smith between 1952 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric E. Smith published across 74 years, from 1952 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 113 publications in 2023. 205 of the 1,202 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 113. Peak 113 publications in 2023. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 3 publications 1955: 2 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 46 publications 2015: 68 publications 2016: 63 publications 2017: 67 publications 2018: 56 publications 2019: 74 publications 2020: 68 publications 2021: 95 publications 2022: 88 publications 2023: 113 publications 2024: 102 publications 2025: 103 publications
1952 2025

1,202 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric E. Smith: publications per year, 1952 to 2025
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 3
1955 2
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 9
2004 6
2005 6
2006 22
2007 14
2008 14
2009 22
2010 29
2011 29
2012 39
2013 53
2014 46
2015 68
2016 63
2017 67
2018 56
2019 74
2020 68
2021 95
2022 88
2023 113
2024 102
2025 103
Total 1,202
Download as CSV

Eric E. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 783 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 783
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric E. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 134
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric E. Smith is a researcher affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada, specializing in Medicine with a significant focus on Neurology and related subfields. Their research contributions span multiple areas including Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Smith has contributed to a number of significant recent publications, including:

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013 (2023, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (2020, The Lancet)
  • The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Cognitive Impairment After Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2023, Stroke)
  • Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia)

Frequent co-authors with whom Smith has collaborated include:

  • Zahinoor Ismail
  • Lee H. Schwamm
  • Gregg C. Fonarow
  • Ying Xian
  • Michael D. Hill

Smith's work has been published extensively in several venues, with notable numbers of publications in:

  • Stroke (86 publications)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia (75 publications)
  • Neurology (30 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (27 publications)
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (22 publications)

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Variants conferring risk of atrial fibrillation on chromosome 4q25

    Daniel F Gudbjartsson;David O Arnar;Anna Helgadottir;Solveig Gretarsdottir

  • Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Gregg C. Fonarow;Eric E. Smith;Mathew J. Reeves

  • 2014 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards)

    Karen A. Hicks;James E. Tcheng;Biykem Bozkurt;Bernard R. Chaitman

  • Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality A Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Daniel T. Lackland;Edward J. Roccella;Anne F. Deutsch;Myriam Fornage

  • Immune activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    Tobias Liebregts;Birgit Adam;Christoph Bredack;Alexander Röth

  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early manifestations of emergent dementia: Provisional diagnostic criteria for mild behavioral impairment

    Zahinoor Ismail;Eric E. Smith;Yonas Geda;David Sultzer

  • Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Bart M. Demaerschalk;Dawn O. Kleindorfer;Opeolu M. Adeoye;Andrew M. Demchuk

  • Timeliness of Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Characteristics, Hospital Factors, and Outcomes Associated With Door-to-Needle Times Within 60 Minutes

    Gregg C. Fonarow;Eric E. Smith;Jeffrey L. Saver;Mathew J. Reeves

  • Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer's disease

    Melanie D. Sweeney;Axel Montagne;Abhay P. Sagare;Daniel A. Nation

  • An autocrine TGF-β/ZEB/miR-200 signaling network regulates establishment and maintenance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition

    Philip A. Gregory;Cameron P. Bracken;Cameron P. Bracken;Eric Smith;Andrew G. Bert

  • Warfarin and Aspirin in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm

    Shunichi Homma;John L.P. Thompson;Patrick M. Pullicino;Bruce Levin

  • Door-to-Needle Times for Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Before and After a Quality Improvement Initiative

    Gregg C. Fonarow;Xin Zhao;Eric E. Smith;Jeffrey L. Saver

  • Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

    Lee H. Schwamm;Gregg C. Fonarow;Mathew J. Reeves;Wenqin Pan

  • Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: Relationship with patient outcomes

    D. Dowlatshahi;A.M. Demchuk;M.L. Flaherty;M. Ali

  • A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System

    Hakan Ay;Thomas Benner;E. Murat Arsava;Karen L. Furie

  • Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Richard E. Wolfe;Richard B. Moore;Eric Smith

  • Hemorrhage Burden Predicts Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Lobar Hemorrhage

    Steven M. Greenberg;Jessica A. Eng;MingMing Ning;Eric E. Smith

  • Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the Boston criteria.

    Eric E. Smith;Steven M. Greenberg

  • Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    D Lackland;E Roccella;Anne Deutsch;M Fornage

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee H. Schwamm
Lee H. Schwamm Harvard University
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Mathew J. Reeves
Mathew J. Reeves Michigan State University
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Steven M. Greenberg
Steven M. Greenberg Harvard University
Jonathan Rosand
Jonathan Rosand Harvard University
Zahinoor Ismail
Zahinoor Ismail University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical careers beyond traditional Medical School in the USA, there are several flexible online degree options worth considering. Many students are drawn to pharmacy school online accredited programs, which allow you to pursue a pharmacy degree with the flexibility of online classes while meeting nationwide accreditation standards.

Another growing field is health information management. Those seeking a specialty in health data and records management can explore rhia certification programs online for convenient and affordable study options.

For those looking for fast entry into healthcare administration, affordable medical billing and coding programs provide training that prepares you for certification and remote work possibilities in a high-demand field.

Finally, if advanced nursing is of interest, the most affordable nurse practitioner programs online offer flexible paths to becoming a licensed advanced practice nurse. These career pathways offer alternatives for those seeking flexibility, affordability, and strong job prospects in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Eric E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles