World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
32981
World Ranking
13957
National Ranking
1291

Paul S. Tofts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Tofts sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 261 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul S. Tofts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul S. Tofts sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul S. Tofts is affiliated with Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily addresses topics within Medicine, with a focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Physiology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Radiation.

The scientist's main research themes involve Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Medical Image Segmentation Techniques, and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications. Additional interests include Body Composition Measurement Techniques, Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography, and MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Recent publications by Paul S. Tofts cover various aspects of quantitative MRI and imaging reproducibility. Notable works include:

  • The perfect diagnostic imaging machine and what it means for quantitative MRI reproducibility, 2023, IPEM-Translation
  • The perfect qMR machine: Measurement variance much less than biological variance, 2022, Physica Medica
  • Enabling reproducible measurements of Fat Fraction and Iron content using an SI traceable reference phantom, 2024, Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • IMET-MRI - UPDATE ON EUROPEAN PROJECT AIMING AT IMPROVING METROLOGY IN QUANTITATIVE MRI, 2022, Physica Medica
  • Realistic phantoms for quantitative MR: the need and a proposal (the B1 sleeve), 2024, IPEM-Translation

Frequently collaborating co-authors with Paul S. Tofts include:

  • Matt Cashmore
  • Aaron McCann
  • Matt G. Hall
  • Cailean Clarkson
  • Cormac McGrath

The scientist's works have been published in several venues, with recurring contributions to:

  • IPEM-Translation
  • Physica Medica
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Metrologia

Best Publications

  • Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

    Paul S. Tofts;Gunnar Brix;David L. Buckley;Jeffrey L. Evelhoch

  • Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

    Paul S. Tofts;Allan G. Kermode

  • Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging

    Paul S. Tofts

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier precedes symptoms and other MRI signs of new lesions in multiple sclerosis : pathogenetic and clinical implications

    A.G. Kermode;A.J. Thompson;P.S. Tofts;D.G. MacManus

  • Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis - A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression

    Na Losseff;Sl Webb;Ji Oriordan;R Page

  • The role of NMR imaging in the assessment of multiple sclerosis and isolated neurological lesions. A quantitative study.

    I. E. C. Ormerod;D. H. Miller;W. I. McDONALD;E. P. G. H. Du Boulay

  • Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in acute multiple sclerosis lesions

    C. A. Davie;C. P. Hawkins;G. J. Barker;A. Brennan

  • The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations

    Martin O Leach;K Brindle;J Evelhoch;John R Griffiths

  • Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model

    Paul S. Tofts;Bruce Berkowitz;Mitchell D. Schnall

  • Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects

    Laura M. Parkes;Laura M. Parkes;Waqar Rashid;Declan T. Chard;Paul S. Tofts

  • Quantitative MRI of the brain : measuring changes caused by disease

    Paul Tofts

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott;Philip A. Boulby;Francesco Scaravilli

  • Persistent functional deficit in multiple sclerosis and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia is associated with axon loss.

    C. A. Davie;G. J. Barker;S. Webb;P. S. Tofts

  • Correlation of magnetization transfer ratio with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A. Gass;G. J. Barker;D. Kidd;J. W. Thorpe

  • Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T.

    Andrew Simmons;Paul S. Tofts;Gareth J. Barker;Simon R. Arridge

  • High field MRI correlates of myelin content and axonal density in multiple sclerosis--a post-mortem study of the spinal cord.

    J. P. Mottershead;K. Schmierer;M. Clemence;J. S. Thornton

  • The pathophysiology of acute optic neuritis. An association of gadolinium leakage with clinical and electrophysiological deficits.

    B. D. Youl;G. Turano;D. H. Miller;A. D. Towell

  • Quantitative magnetic resonance of postmortem multiple sclerosis brain before and after fixation.

    Klaus Schmierer;Claudia A.M. Wheeler-Kingshott;Daniel J. Tozer;Phil A. Boulby

  • Test liquids for quantitative MRI measurements of self-diffusion coefficient in vivo

    Paul S. Tofts;D. Lloyd;C. A. Clark;G. J. Barker

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth J. Barker
Gareth J. Barker King's College London
Daniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann Imperial College London
Alan J. Thompson
Alan J. Thompson University College London
Mark R. Symms
Mark R. Symms University College London
Martin O. Leach
Martin O. Leach Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Jennifer Rusted
Jennifer Rusted University of Sussex
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott University College London
Laura M. Parkes
Laura M. Parkes University of Manchester
Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Achim Gass
Achim Gass Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in healthcare beyond traditional medical school, there are a variety of online degrees and alternative career pathways worth exploring. For non-nursing majors interested in transitioning to nursing, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors can offer a fast-track option to earn a master’s degree in nursing. These programs often require a previous bachelor’s degree but do not demand a prior nursing license.

Students looking for the simplest entry points into nursing might benefit from exploring direct admit nursing programs, which waive some of the traditional requirements and offer a more straightforward admissions process.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, accredited online programs in billing or coding can lead to lucrative opportunities. Options such as medical billing and coding online schools make it easier to pursue these careers with flexible schedules and financial aid.

Additionally, there are educational routes which do not require standardized tests for admission, which can be an advantage for some students. For instance, if you’re wondering do you have to take a teas test for lpn, there are nursing schools that waive such requirements—making access to the profession even more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Paul S. Tofts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles