World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 45 6827 6280 529 487 131 11021

Laura M. Parkes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura M. Parkes between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura M. Parkes published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2024. 39 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2024. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 16 publications
2001 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura M. Parkes: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 4
2010 6
2011 7
2012 8
2013 7
2014 13
2015 8
2016 9
2017 9
2018 6
2019 2
2020 10
2021 14
2022 5
2023 10
2024 23
2025 16
Total 174
Download as CSV

Laura M. Parkes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura M. Parkes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 131
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura M. Parkes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura M. Parkes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 45
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Laura M. Parkes is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Materials Chemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Physiology.

The main topics covered in their work encompass Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, MRI in cancer diagnosis, Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Neurological disorders and treatments.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Laura M. Parkes include:

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Is Increased in Parkinson's Disease (2020), published in Frontiers in Physiology
  • A Systematic Review of Glucose Transport Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease (2021), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • International Multicenter Analysis of Brain Structure Across Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease (2021), published in Movement Disorders
  • In vivo methods for imaging blood-brain barrier function and dysfunction (2022), published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Recommendations for quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI using multi-timepoint arterial spin labeling: Acquisition, quantification, and clinical applications (2024), published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Laura M. Parkes include:

  • Ben Dickie
  • Geoff J.M. Parker
  • Sarah Al-Bachari
  • Hedley Emsley
  • Elizabeth Powell

Publication venues where Laura M. Parkes has contributed multiple works include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Movement Disorders
  • NMR in Biomedicine

Best Publications

  • Recommended Implementation of Arterial Spin Labeled Perfusion MRI for Clinical Applications: A consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in Dementia

    David C. Alsop;John A. Detre;Xavier Golay;Matthias Günther

  • Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision

    Laura Parkes;Jennifer Lund;Alessandra Angelucci;Joshua A. Solomon

  • Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects

    Laura M. Parkes;Laura M. Parkes;Waqar Rashid;Declan T. Chard;Paul S. Tofts

  • Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space.

    Nienke Hoogenboom;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Laura M. Parkes

  • Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability.

    Laura M. Parkes;Paul S. Tofts

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI

    J P B O'Connor;P S Tofts;K A Miles;L M Parkes

  • Blood–Brain Barrier Leakage Is Increased in Parkinson’s Disease

    Sarah Al-Bachari;Josephine H Naish;Geoff J M Parker;Hedley C A Emsley

  • Quantifying the spatial resolution of the gradient echo and spin echo BOLD response at 3 Tesla.

    Laura M. Parkes;Jens V. Schwarzbach;Annemieke A. Bouts;Roel h R. Deckers

  • Abnormalities of cerebral perfusion in multiple sclerosis

    W. Rashid;L. M. Parkes;G. T. Ingle;Daniel Chard

  • A comparison of dual gradient-echo and spin-echo fMRI of the inferior temporal lobe.

    Ajay D Halai;Stephen R Welbourne;Karl Embleton;Laura M Parkes

  • Depressive disorders: Focally altered cerebral perfusion measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging

    Su Lui;Laura M. Parkes;Xiaoqi Huang;Ke Zou

  • Combining EEG and fMRI to investigate the post-movement beta rebound.

    Laura M. Parkes;Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen;David G. Norris

  • Multivoxel fMRI analysis of color tuning in human primary visual cortex

    Laura M. Parkes;Jan Bernard C Marsman;David C. Oxley;John Y. Goulermas

  • A Systematic Review of Glucose Transport Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease.

    Natalia Kyrtata;Natalia Kyrtata;Hedley C A Emsley;Hedley C A Emsley;Oli Sparasci;Laura M Parkes

  • International Multicenter Analysis of Brain Structure Across Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease

    Max A. Laansma;Joanna K. Bright;Sarah Al-Bachari;Sarah Al-Bachari;Tim J. Anderson

  • Cued Memory Reactivation during Slow-Wave Sleep Promotes Explicit Knowledge of a Motor Sequence

    James N. Cousins;Wael El-Deredy;Laura M. Parkes;Nora Hennies

  • Cobalt nanoparticles as a novel magnetic resonance contrast agent--relaxivities at 1.5 and 3 Tesla

    Laura M. Parkes;Richard Hodgson;Le T. Lu;Le D. Tung

  • Validation of High-Resolution Tractography Against In Vivo Tracing in the Macaque Visual Cortex

    Hojjatollah Azadbakht;Laura M. Parkes;Hamied A. Haroon;Mark Augath

  • Cued reactivation of motor learning during sleep leads to overnight changes in functional brain activity and connectivity

    James N. Cousins;James N. Cousins;Wael El-Deredy;Wael El-Deredy;Laura M. Parkes;Nora Hennies;Nora Hennies

  • Calibrated fMRI during a cognitive Stroop task reveals reduced metabolic response with increasing age.

    Rafat S. Mohtasib;Guy Lumley;Jonathan A. Goodwin;Jonathan A. Goodwin;Hedley C.A. Emsley

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoff J.M. Parker
Geoff J.M. Parker University College London
Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Penelope A. Lewis
Penelope A. Lewis Cardiff University
Daniela Montaldi
Daniela Montaldi University of Manchester
Pascal Fries
Pascal Fries Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Paul S. Tofts
Paul S. Tofts Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Tom Solomon
Tom Solomon University of Liverpool
David G. Norris
David G. Norris Radboud University
Clare E. Mackay
Clare E. Mackay University of Oxford
Jonathan Green
Jonathan Green University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Neuroscience opens up a variety of career opportunities. If you’re exploring flexible study options, there are online pathways worth considering. For those interested in majors related to Neuroscience, you might explore fun majors in college that pay well. Subjects like psychology, biology, and data science can complement your neuroscience studies and offer lucrative opportunities.

Cost is an important factor for many students. Look into cheap online colleges that accept fafsa to minimize debt and make your education more affordable. Some students may want to enhance their skills with additional credentials. There are plenty of online certificates related to neuroscience, clinical research, or health technology that provide value in a competitive job market.

If you’re seeking a faster route to graduation, consider programs identified as the easiest degree to get online. While neuroscience is intellectually demanding, combining it with a flexible online pathway or pairing it with complementary majors and certificates can help you achieve your career goals efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Laura M. Parkes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles