World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
11021
World Ranking
6827
National Ranking
529

Laura M. Parkes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura M. Parkes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Laura M. Parkes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura M. Parkes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laura M. Parkes is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Materials Chemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Physiology.

The main topics covered in their work encompass Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, MRI in cancer diagnosis, Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Neurological disorders and treatments.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Laura M. Parkes include:

  • Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Is Increased in Parkinson's Disease (2020), published in Frontiers in Physiology
  • A Systematic Review of Glucose Transport Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease (2021), published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • International Multicenter Analysis of Brain Structure Across Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease (2021), published in Movement Disorders
  • In vivo methods for imaging blood-brain barrier function and dysfunction (2022), published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Recommendations for quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI using multi-timepoint arterial spin labeling: Acquisition, quantification, and clinical applications (2024), published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Laura M. Parkes include:

  • Ben Dickie
  • Geoff J.M. Parker
  • Sarah Al-Bachari
  • Hedley Emsley
  • Elizabeth Powell

Publication venues where Laura M. Parkes has contributed multiple works include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • Movement Disorders
  • NMR in Biomedicine

Best Publications

  • Recommended Implementation of Arterial Spin Labeled Perfusion MRI for Clinical Applications: A consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in Dementia

    David C. Alsop;John A. Detre;Xavier Golay;Matthias Günther

  • Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision

    Laura Parkes;Jennifer Lund;Alessandra Angelucci;Joshua A. Solomon

  • Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: Reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects

    Laura M. Parkes;Laura M. Parkes;Waqar Rashid;Declan T. Chard;Paul S. Tofts

  • Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space.

    Nienke Hoogenboom;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Laura M. Parkes

  • Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability.

    Laura M. Parkes;Paul S. Tofts

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI

    J P B O'Connor;P S Tofts;K A Miles;L M Parkes

  • Blood–Brain Barrier Leakage Is Increased in Parkinson’s Disease

    Sarah Al-Bachari;Josephine H Naish;Geoff J M Parker;Hedley C A Emsley

  • Quantifying the spatial resolution of the gradient echo and spin echo BOLD response at 3 Tesla.

    Laura M. Parkes;Jens V. Schwarzbach;Annemieke A. Bouts;Roel h R. Deckers

  • Abnormalities of cerebral perfusion in multiple sclerosis

    W. Rashid;L. M. Parkes;G. T. Ingle;Daniel Chard

  • A comparison of dual gradient-echo and spin-echo fMRI of the inferior temporal lobe.

    Ajay D Halai;Stephen R Welbourne;Karl Embleton;Laura M Parkes

  • Depressive disorders: Focally altered cerebral perfusion measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging

    Su Lui;Laura M. Parkes;Xiaoqi Huang;Ke Zou

  • Combining EEG and fMRI to investigate the post-movement beta rebound.

    Laura M. Parkes;Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen;David G. Norris

  • Multivoxel fMRI analysis of color tuning in human primary visual cortex

    Laura M. Parkes;Jan Bernard C Marsman;David C. Oxley;John Y. Goulermas

  • A Systematic Review of Glucose Transport Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease.

    Natalia Kyrtata;Natalia Kyrtata;Hedley C A Emsley;Hedley C A Emsley;Oli Sparasci;Laura M Parkes

  • International Multicenter Analysis of Brain Structure Across Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease

    Max A. Laansma;Joanna K. Bright;Sarah Al-Bachari;Sarah Al-Bachari;Tim J. Anderson

  • Cued Memory Reactivation during Slow-Wave Sleep Promotes Explicit Knowledge of a Motor Sequence

    James N. Cousins;Wael El-Deredy;Laura M. Parkes;Nora Hennies

  • Cobalt nanoparticles as a novel magnetic resonance contrast agent--relaxivities at 1.5 and 3 Tesla

    Laura M. Parkes;Richard Hodgson;Le T. Lu;Le D. Tung

  • Validation of High-Resolution Tractography Against In Vivo Tracing in the Macaque Visual Cortex

    Hojjatollah Azadbakht;Laura M. Parkes;Hamied A. Haroon;Mark Augath

  • Cued reactivation of motor learning during sleep leads to overnight changes in functional brain activity and connectivity

    James N. Cousins;James N. Cousins;Wael El-Deredy;Wael El-Deredy;Laura M. Parkes;Nora Hennies;Nora Hennies

  • Calibrated fMRI during a cognitive Stroop task reveals reduced metabolic response with increasing age.

    Rafat S. Mohtasib;Guy Lumley;Jonathan A. Goodwin;Jonathan A. Goodwin;Hedley C.A. Emsley

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoff J.M. Parker
Geoff J.M. Parker University College London
Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Penelope A. Lewis
Penelope A. Lewis Cardiff University
Daniela Montaldi
Daniela Montaldi University of Manchester
Pascal Fries
Pascal Fries Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Paul S. Tofts
Paul S. Tofts Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Tom Solomon
Tom Solomon University of Liverpool
David G. Norris
David G. Norris Radboud University
Clare E. Mackay
Clare E. Mackay University of Oxford
Jonathan Green
Jonathan Green University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Neuroscience opens up a variety of career opportunities. If you’re exploring flexible study options, there are online pathways worth considering. For those interested in majors related to Neuroscience, you might explore fun majors in college that pay well. Subjects like psychology, biology, and data science can complement your neuroscience studies and offer lucrative opportunities.

Cost is an important factor for many students. Look into cheap online colleges that accept fafsa to minimize debt and make your education more affordable. Some students may want to enhance their skills with additional credentials. There are plenty of online certificates related to neuroscience, clinical research, or health technology that provide value in a competitive job market.

If you’re seeking a faster route to graduation, consider programs identified as the easiest degree to get online. While neuroscience is intellectually demanding, combining it with a flexible online pathway or pairing it with complementary majors and certificates can help you achieve your career goals efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Laura M. Parkes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles