World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
18508
World Ranking
2125
National Ranking
189

Achim Gass publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Gass sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 322 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Achim Gass D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Achim Gass sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Achim Gass is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on several subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

Their research output encompasses over 100 publications, with significant work on topics such as Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, RNA regulation and disease, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders. Additional research interests include Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography.

Achim Gass has published in a variety of journals, frequently contributing to these venues:

  • Journal of Neuroimaging
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Recent notable publications include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG): position statement on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (white paper), 2021, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
  • Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management, 2023, Journal of Neurology
  • Diffusion-weighted MRI in transient global amnesia and its diagnostic implications, 2020, Neurology
  • The neuroradiology of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a clinical trial perspective, 2021, Brain
  • Exploring joint patterns of brain structure and function in inflammatory bowel diseases using multimodal data fusion, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, including:

  • Philipp Eisele
  • Michael Platten
  • Claudia E. Weber
  • Matthias Wittayer
  • Claudio Gobbi

Best Publications

  • DTI measures in crossing-fibre areas: increased diffusion anisotropy reveals early white matter alteration in MCI and mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Saâd Jbabdi;Timothy Edward John Behrens;Ricarda A. Menke

  • Transcranial Low-Frequency Ultrasound-Mediated Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia Increased Risk of Hemorrhage With Combined Ultrasound and Tissue Plasminogen Activator: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial

    Michael Daffertshofer;Achim Gass;Peter Ringleb;Matthias Sitzer

  • Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis

    Sergio E. Baranzini;Joanne Wang;Rachel A. Gibson;Nicholas Galwey

  • Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging

    Jochen B. Fiebach;Peter D. Schellinger;Achim Gass;Thomas Kucinski

  • Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines

    Massimo Filippi;Paolo Preziosa;Brenda L Banwell;Frederik Barkhof;Frederik Barkhof

  • Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis on MRI Parameters and Functional Outcome in Acute Stroke <6 Hours

    J. Röther;P.D. Schellinger;A. Gass;M. Siebler

  • Correlation of magnetization transfer ratio with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A. Gass;G. J. Barker;D. Kidd;J. W. Thorpe

  • Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI demonstrates parenchymal changes in complex partial status epilepticus

    Kristina Szabo;Annkathrin Poepel;Bernd Pohlmann-Eden;Jochen Hirsch

  • Brain atrophy and lesion load predict long term disability in multiple sclerosis

    Veronica Popescu;Federica Agosta;Hanneke E Hulst;Ingrid C Sluimer

  • Assessing brain atrophy rates in a large population of untreated multiple sclerosis subtypes.

    N. De Stefano;A. Giorgio;M. Battaglini;M. Rovaris

  • A common brain network links development, aging, and vulnerability to disease

    Gwenaëlle Douaud;Adrian R. Groves;Christian K. Tamnes;Lars Tjelta Westlye

  • Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis

    M. Rovaris;A. Gass;R. Bammer;S. J. Hickman

  • Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI

    J.J.G. Geurts;S.D. Roosendaal;M. Calabrese;O. Ciccarelli

  • Bleeding Risk Analysis in Stroke Imaging Before ThromboLysis (BRASIL) Pooled Analysis of T2*-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data From 570 Patients

    Jens Fiehler;Gregory W Albers;Jean-Martin Boulanger;Laurent Derex

  • Copeptin: A novel, independent prognostic marker in patients with ischemic stroke

    Mira Katan;Felix Fluri;Nils G Morgenthaler;Philipp Schuetz

  • Detection of delayed focal MR changes in the lateral hippocampus in transient global amnesia

    O. Sedlaczek;J. G. Hirsch;E. Grips;C. N.A. Peters

  • Bapineuzumab for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in two global, randomized, phase 3 trials.

    Rik Vandenberghe;Juha O. Rinne;Mercè Boada;Sadao Katayama

  • Leukoaraiosis is a risk factor for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute stroke.

    Tobias Neumann-Haefelin;Silke Hoelig;Joachim Berkefeld;Jens Fiehler

  • Risk for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis assessed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging†

    Oliver C Singer;Marek C Humpich;Jens Fiehler;Gregory W Albers

  • Apheresis therapies for NMOSD attacks: A retrospective study of 207 therapeutic interventions

    Ingo Kleiter;Anna Gahlen;Nadja Borisow;Katrin Fischer

  • Magnetic resonance imaging pattern in natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

    Tarek A. Yousry;Daniel Pelletier;Diego Cadavid;Achim Gass

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. Hennerici
Michael G. Hennerici Heidelberg University
Ludwig Kappos
Ludwig Kappos University Hospital of Basel
Massimo Filippi
Massimo Filippi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Olga Ciccarelli
Olga Ciccarelli University College London
Xavier Montalban
Xavier Montalban Autonomous University of Barcelona
Christian Enzinger
Christian Enzinger Medical University of Graz
Tarek A. Yousry
Tarek A. Yousry University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students interested in flexible study options may consider accelerated degree programs online. These programs allow you to complete your studies faster, helping you enter the job market or pursue graduate education sooner.

When selecting a major, it's valuable to consider future earning potential and employment opportunities. Exploring the best bachelor degrees can help you align your interests in brain science with solid financial prospects. Similarly, reviewing college majors that make the most money ensures your educational investment pays off in the long run.

Financing your education is another key factor. If you're seeking affordable options, check out the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa in usa. These institutions provide access to federal financial aid and cost-effective tuition, making a neuroscience degree more accessible no matter your background.

Best Scientists Citing Achim Gass

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles