World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 138 1843 1715 190 182 699 62539

Gareth J. Barker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gareth J. Barker between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gareth J. Barker published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 25.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2020. 35 of the 1,045 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2020. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 17 publications 1991: 24 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 50 publications 2000: 32 publications 2001: 32 publications 2002: 30 publications 2003: 31 publications 2004: 42 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 61 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 3 publications
1986 2026

1,045 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gareth J. Barker: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 17
1991 24
1992 16
1993 6
1994 17
1995 11
1996 13
1997 13
1998 19
1999 50
2000 32
2001 32
2002 30
2003 31
2004 42
2005 25
2006 22
2007 28
2008 24
2009 32
2010 24
2011 34
2012 35
2013 38
2014 45
2015 36
2016 31
2017 27
2018 25
2019 34
2020 61
2021 41
2022 26
2023 26
2024 38
2025 32
2026 3
Total 1,045
Download as CSV

Gareth J. Barker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Barker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 699 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 699
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gareth J. Barker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Barker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 138
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gareth J. Barker is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Physics and Astronomy, and Neuroscience. Within these broad fields, key subfields of study include Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics covered in Barker's body of work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neutrino Physics Research, Particle Physics Theoretical and Experimental Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena, and Particle Detector Development and Performance.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Barker include Sylvane Desrivières, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Frauke Nees, Tobias Banaschewski, and Herta Flor.

Barker's publications appear regularly in a variety of scientific venues with the most frequent being arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Instrumentation, The European Physical Journal C, and Physical Review D.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Barker include:

  • Volume I. Introduction to DUNE (2020), Journal of Instrumentation
  • Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan (2022), Nature Neuroscience
  • Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment (2020), Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
  • Volume IV. The DUNE far detector single-phase technology (2020), Journal of Instrumentation
  • Supernova neutrino burst detection with the deep underground neutrino experiment (2020), Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging

    T E J Behrens;H Johansen-Berg;M W Woolrich;M W Woolrich;S M Smith

  • Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Francesco Scaravilli;Daniel R. Altmann;Daniel R. Altmann;Gareth J. Barker;Gareth J. Barker

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis.

    D.J. Werring;C.A. Clark;G.J. Barker;A.J. Thompson

  • Study design in fMRI: basic principles.

    Edson Amaro;Gareth J. Barker

  • Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis - A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression

    Na Losseff;Sl Webb;Ji Oriordan;R Page

  • The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology.

    G Schumann;E Loth;T Banaschewski;A Barbot

  • Amygdala Hypoactivity to Fearful Faces in Boys With Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits

    Alice P. Jones;Kristin R. Laurens;Catherine M. Herba;Gareth J. Barker

  • Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks

    Jonas Richiardi;Jonas Richiardi;Andre Altmann;Anna-Clare Milazzo;Anna-Clare Milazzo;Catie Chang

  • Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data.

    D. C. Alexander;Gareth Barker;S. R. Arridge

  • Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in acute multiple sclerosis lesions

    C. A. Davie;C. P. Hawkins;G. J. Barker;A. Brennan

  • Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke

    David J. Werring;Ahmed T. Toosy;Christopher A. Clark;Geoffrey J M Parker

  • PYY modulation of cortical and hypothalamic brain areas predicts feeding behaviour in humans

    Rachel L. Batterham;Dominic H. ffytche;J. Miranda Rosenthal;Fernando O. Zelaya

  • Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks.

    Robert Whelan;Patricia J Conrod;Patricia J Conrod;Jean-Baptiste Poline;Anbarasu Lourdusamy

  • Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers

    Robert Whelan;Robert Whelan;Richard Watts;Catherine A. Orr;Robert R. Althoff

  • Hemispheric asymmetries in language-related pathways: A combined functional MRI and tractography study

    H. W. Robert Powell;Geoffrey J. M. Parker;Daniel C. Alexander;Mark R. Symms

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott;Philip A. Boulby;Francesco Scaravilli

  • Persistent functional deficit in multiple sclerosis and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia is associated with axon loss.

    C. A. Davie;G. J. Barker;S. Webb;P. S. Tofts

  • Neuropathological abnormalities of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study

    J Foong;M Maier;C A Clark;G J Barker

  • Correlation of magnetization transfer ratio with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A. Gass;G. J. Barker;D. Kidd;J. W. Thorpe

  • Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations

    O. Ciccarelli;D. J. Werring;C. A M Wheeler-Kingshott;G. J. Barker

Frequent Co-Authors

A. C. Weber
A. C. Weber University of Oxford
D. Karlen
D. Karlen University of Victoria
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
Kate Scholberg
Kate Scholberg Duke University
Gunter Schumann
Gunter Schumann King's College London
C. K. Jung
C. K. Jung Stony Brook University
Patricia J. Conrod
Patricia J. Conrod University of Montreal
Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that offer excellent opportunities, flexibility, and affordability. These programs often provide a quicker route into rewarding healthcare positions and can serve as stepping stones toward advanced degrees.

Nursing professionals may benefit from enrolling in the best online bsn to dnp programs. These programs help nurses attain the highest level of clinical practice without interrupting their careers. For those interested in pharmaceuticals, pursuing an online pharmacy degree can open doors to various roles in healthcare, community pharmacies, and research.

Healthcare administration is another growing field, with him programs focusing on health information management, data analysis, and compliance. Finally, there is high demand for skilled technicians, with billing and coding classes online preparing students for essential roles in processing medical records and billing.

By exploring these related programs, you can expand your career options and find the ideal pathway that fits your goals and lifestyle within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gareth J. Barker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles