World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
138
Citations
62539
World Ranking
1843
National Ranking
190

Gareth J. Barker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Barker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 699 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gareth J. Barker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth J. Barker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gareth J. Barker is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Physics and Astronomy, and Neuroscience. Within these broad fields, key subfields of study include Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics covered in Barker's body of work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neutrino Physics Research, Particle Physics Theoretical and Experimental Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena, and Particle Detector Development and Performance.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Barker include Sylvane Desrivières, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Frauke Nees, Tobias Banaschewski, and Herta Flor.

Barker's publications appear regularly in a variety of scientific venues with the most frequent being arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Instrumentation, The European Physical Journal C, and Physical Review D.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Barker include:

  • Volume I. Introduction to DUNE (2020), Journal of Instrumentation
  • Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan (2022), Nature Neuroscience
  • Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment (2020), Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
  • Volume IV. The DUNE far detector single-phase technology (2020), Journal of Instrumentation
  • Supernova neutrino burst detection with the deep underground neutrino experiment (2020), Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging

    T E J Behrens;H Johansen-Berg;M W Woolrich;M W Woolrich;S M Smith

  • Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Francesco Scaravilli;Daniel R. Altmann;Daniel R. Altmann;Gareth J. Barker;Gareth J. Barker

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis.

    D.J. Werring;C.A. Clark;G.J. Barker;A.J. Thompson

  • Study design in fMRI: basic principles.

    Edson Amaro;Gareth J. Barker

  • Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis - A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression

    Na Losseff;Sl Webb;Ji Oriordan;R Page

  • The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology.

    G Schumann;E Loth;T Banaschewski;A Barbot

  • Amygdala Hypoactivity to Fearful Faces in Boys With Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits

    Alice P. Jones;Kristin R. Laurens;Catherine M. Herba;Gareth J. Barker

  • Correlated gene expression supports synchronous activity in brain networks

    Jonas Richiardi;Jonas Richiardi;Andre Altmann;Anna-Clare Milazzo;Anna-Clare Milazzo;Catie Chang

  • Detection and modeling of non-Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data.

    D. C. Alexander;Gareth Barker;S. R. Arridge

  • Serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in acute multiple sclerosis lesions

    C. A. Davie;C. P. Hawkins;G. J. Barker;A. Brennan

  • Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke

    David J. Werring;Ahmed T. Toosy;Christopher A. Clark;Geoffrey J M Parker

  • PYY modulation of cortical and hypothalamic brain areas predicts feeding behaviour in humans

    Rachel L. Batterham;Dominic H. ffytche;J. Miranda Rosenthal;Fernando O. Zelaya

  • Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks.

    Robert Whelan;Patricia J Conrod;Patricia J Conrod;Jean-Baptiste Poline;Anbarasu Lourdusamy

  • Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers

    Robert Whelan;Robert Whelan;Richard Watts;Catherine A. Orr;Robert R. Althoff

  • Hemispheric asymmetries in language-related pathways: A combined functional MRI and tractography study

    H. W. Robert Powell;Geoffrey J. M. Parker;Daniel C. Alexander;Mark R. Symms

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott;Philip A. Boulby;Francesco Scaravilli

  • Persistent functional deficit in multiple sclerosis and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia is associated with axon loss.

    C. A. Davie;G. J. Barker;S. Webb;P. S. Tofts

  • Neuropathological abnormalities of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study

    J Foong;M Maier;C A Clark;G J Barker

  • Correlation of magnetization transfer ratio with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.

    A. Gass;G. J. Barker;D. Kidd;J. W. Thorpe

  • Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tensor MRI with clinical correlations

    O. Ciccarelli;D. J. Werring;C. A M Wheeler-Kingshott;G. J. Barker

Frequent Co-Authors

A. C. Weber
A. C. Weber University of Oxford
D. Karlen
D. Karlen University of Victoria
Tomáš Paus
Tomáš Paus University of Toronto
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
Kate Scholberg
Kate Scholberg Duke University
Gunter Schumann
Gunter Schumann King's College London
C. K. Jung
C. K. Jung Stony Brook University
Patricia J. Conrod
Patricia J. Conrod University of Montreal
Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that offer excellent opportunities, flexibility, and affordability. These programs often provide a quicker route into rewarding healthcare positions and can serve as stepping stones toward advanced degrees.

Nursing professionals may benefit from enrolling in the best online bsn to dnp programs. These programs help nurses attain the highest level of clinical practice without interrupting their careers. For those interested in pharmaceuticals, pursuing an online pharmacy degree can open doors to various roles in healthcare, community pharmacies, and research.

Healthcare administration is another growing field, with him programs focusing on health information management, data analysis, and compliance. Finally, there is high demand for skilled technicians, with billing and coding classes online preparing students for essential roles in processing medical records and billing.

By exploring these related programs, you can expand your career options and find the ideal pathway that fits your goals and lifestyle within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Gareth J. Barker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles