World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
40563
World Ranking
9943
National Ranking
962

Martin O. Leach publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O. Leach sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 585 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin O. Leach D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O. Leach sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin O. Leach is affiliated with the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom, with a research focus predominantly in the field of Medicine. Their work primarily intersects Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, supplemented by contributions in Cancer Research, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Immunology.

Their research topics highlight a concentration on MRI applications in oncology and related technological advances. Main topics addressed in their work include:

  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Leach has multiple recent publications across distinct but related biomedical fields. These include:

  • "Monocarboxylate transporter 1 blockade with AZD3965 inhibits lipid biosynthesis and increases tumour immune cell infiltration," 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • "Noise-Corrected, Exponentially Weighted, Diffusion-Weighted MRI (niceDWI) Improves Image Signal Uniformity in Whole-Body Imaging of Metastatic Prostate Cancer," 2020, Frontiers in Oncology
  • "Development of machine learning support for reading whole body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-MRI) in myeloma for the detection and quantification of the extent of disease before and after treatment (MALIMAR): protocol for a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study," 2022, BMJ Open
  • "MRI texture feature repeatability and image acquisition factor robustness, a phantom study and in silico study," 2021, European Radiology Experimental
  • "Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial," 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Their work has been published in several key venues, including:

  • European Radiology Experimental
  • British Journal of Cancer
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Frequent collaborators include Dow-Mu Koh, David J. Collins, Matthew Blackledge, Nina Tunariu, and Matthew Orton. These coauthors have worked with Leach on multiple publications, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts in related research areas.

Best Publications

  • Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images

    D. Rueckert;L.I. Sonoda;C. Hayes;D.L.G. Hill

  • American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

    Debbie Saslow;Carla Boetes;Wylie Burke;Steven Harms

  • Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

    M O Leach;C R M Boggis;A K Dixon;D F Easton

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Analysis of Cancer Metabolism by Imaging Hyperpolarized Nuclei: Prospects for Translation to Clinical Research

    John Kurhanewicz;Daniel B. Vigneron;Kevin Brindle;Eduard Y. Chekmenev

  • Clinical Proton MR Spectroscopy in Central Nervous System Disorders

    Gülin Öz;Jeffry R. Alger;Peter B. Barker;Robert Bartha

  • The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations

    Martin O Leach;K Brindle;J Evelhoch;John R Griffiths

  • Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

    Suzanne A. Eccles;Eric O. Aboagye;Simak Ali;Annie S. Anderson

  • Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations

    Martin Wilson;Ovidiu Andronesi;Peter B Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Morphology and Tumour Stage, Histological Grade and PSA

    Anwar R. Padhani;Connie J. Gapinski;David A. Macvicar;Geoffrey J. Parker

  • Predicting Response of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis: Value of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

    Dow-Mu Koh;Erica Scurr;David Collins;Baris Kanber

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning

    Vincent S. Khoo;David P. Dearnaley;David J. Finnigan;Anwar Padhani

  • Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images

    J.A. Schnabel;C. Tanner;A.D. Castellano-Smith;A. Degenhard

  • Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases

    A. Andreou;D. M. Koh;D. M. Koh;D. J. Collins;D. J. Collins;M. Blackledge

  • Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

    Carmel Hayes;Anwar R. Padhani;Martin O. Leach

  • Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI

    Anwar R Padhani;Vincent S Khoo;John Suckling;Janet E Husband

  • Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Initial clinical results

    Anwar R. Padhani;Carmel Hayes;Laura Assersohn;Trevor Powles

  • A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction

    Simon J Doran;Liz Charles-Edwards;Stefan A Reinsberg;Martin O Leach

  • Measurement of the extracellular pH of solid tumours in mice by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of exogenous 19F and 31P probes

    Agatha S. E. Ojugo;Paul M. J. McSheehy;Dominick J. O. McIntyre;Cheryl McCoy

  • Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer; a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS)

    MO Leach;CR Boggis;AK Dixon;DF Easton

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Anwar R. Padhani
Anwar R. Padhani Northwood University
Paul Workman
Paul Workman Institute of Cancer Research
John R. Griffiths
John R. Griffiths University of Manchester
Ian Judson
Ian Judson Institute of Cancer Research
David Atkinson
David Atkinson University of Liverpool
Rosalind A. Eeles
Rosalind A. Eeles Institute of Cancer Research
Fiona J. Gilbert
Fiona J. Gilbert University of Cambridge
Angelo Bifone
Angelo Bifone University of Turin
Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA opens multiple pathways beyond the traditional MD route. Many students explore graduate-level options, such as pursuing online mha programs. These programs provide future healthcare administrators with flexible, accredited opportunities to build leadership skills in healthcare management.

For registered nurses seeking career advancement, there are options like online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs enable working nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing without additional in-person clinical requirements, making it easier to balance study with employment.

Those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice might consider online dnp programs. The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) qualification can help nurses transition into leadership, policy, or advanced clinical roles. Some students may also look for accessible options, such as dnp programs online, which focus on streamlined admission and graduation tracks.

Online degrees can open doors to many health and medicine-related careers, providing flexible learning suited to different goals and backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Martin O. Leach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles