World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 9942 9326 959 915 585 40563

Martin O. Leach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin O. Leach between 1977 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin O. Leach published across 48 years, from 1977 to 2024, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 86 publications in 2023. 91 of the 695 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 86. Peak 86 publications in 2023. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 27 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 36 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 86 publications 2024: 5 publications
1977 2024

695 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin O. Leach: publications per year, 1977 to 2024
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 4
1983 5
1984 8
1985 5
1986 6
1987 4
1988 3
1989 6
1990 3
1991 9
1992 10
1993 4
1994 8
1995 10
1996 5
1997 10
1998 15
1999 19
2000 27
2001 17
2002 23
2003 19
2004 33
2005 36
2006 26
2007 23
2008 18
2009 30
2010 10
2011 16
2012 25
2013 28
2014 20
2015 27
2016 32
2017 28
2018 14
2019 5
2020 5
2021 4
2022 2
2023 86
2024 5
Total 695
Download as CSV

Martin O. Leach publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O. Leach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 585 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 585
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin O. Leach D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin O. Leach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin O. Leach is affiliated with the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom, with a research focus predominantly in the field of Medicine. Their work primarily intersects Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, supplemented by contributions in Cancer Research, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Immunology.

Their research topics highlight a concentration on MRI applications in oncology and related technological advances. Main topics addressed in their work include:

  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Leach has multiple recent publications across distinct but related biomedical fields. These include:

  • "Monocarboxylate transporter 1 blockade with AZD3965 inhibits lipid biosynthesis and increases tumour immune cell infiltration," 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • "Noise-Corrected, Exponentially Weighted, Diffusion-Weighted MRI (niceDWI) Improves Image Signal Uniformity in Whole-Body Imaging of Metastatic Prostate Cancer," 2020, Frontiers in Oncology
  • "Development of machine learning support for reading whole body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-MRI) in myeloma for the detection and quantification of the extent of disease before and after treatment (MALIMAR): protocol for a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study," 2022, BMJ Open
  • "MRI texture feature repeatability and image acquisition factor robustness, a phantom study and in silico study," 2021, European Radiology Experimental
  • "Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial," 2024, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Their work has been published in several key venues, including:

  • European Radiology Experimental
  • British Journal of Cancer
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Frequent collaborators include Dow-Mu Koh, David J. Collins, Matthew Blackledge, Nina Tunariu, and Matthew Orton. These coauthors have worked with Leach on multiple publications, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts in related research areas.

Best Publications

  • Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images

    D. Rueckert;L.I. Sonoda;C. Hayes;D.L.G. Hill

  • American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

    Debbie Saslow;Carla Boetes;Wylie Burke;Steven Harms

  • Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

    M O Leach;C R M Boggis;A K Dixon;D F Easton

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Analysis of Cancer Metabolism by Imaging Hyperpolarized Nuclei: Prospects for Translation to Clinical Research

    John Kurhanewicz;Daniel B. Vigneron;Kevin Brindle;Eduard Y. Chekmenev

  • Clinical Proton MR Spectroscopy in Central Nervous System Disorders

    Gülin Öz;Jeffry R. Alger;Peter B. Barker;Robert Bartha

  • The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations

    Martin O Leach;K Brindle;J Evelhoch;John R Griffiths

  • Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

    Suzanne A. Eccles;Eric O. Aboagye;Simak Ali;Annie S. Anderson

  • Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations

    Martin Wilson;Ovidiu Andronesi;Peter B Barker;Robert Bartha

  • Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Morphology and Tumour Stage, Histological Grade and PSA

    Anwar R. Padhani;Connie J. Gapinski;David A. Macvicar;Geoffrey J. Parker

  • Predicting Response of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis: Value of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

    Dow-Mu Koh;Erica Scurr;David Collins;Baris Kanber

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning

    Vincent S. Khoo;David P. Dearnaley;David J. Finnigan;Anwar Padhani

  • Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images

    J.A. Schnabel;C. Tanner;A.D. Castellano-Smith;A. Degenhard

  • Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases

    A. Andreou;D. M. Koh;D. M. Koh;D. J. Collins;D. J. Collins;M. Blackledge

  • Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

    Carmel Hayes;Anwar R. Padhani;Martin O. Leach

  • Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI

    Anwar R Padhani;Vincent S Khoo;John Suckling;Janet E Husband

  • Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Initial clinical results

    Anwar R. Padhani;Carmel Hayes;Laura Assersohn;Trevor Powles

  • A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction

    Simon J Doran;Liz Charles-Edwards;Stefan A Reinsberg;Martin O Leach

  • Measurement of the extracellular pH of solid tumours in mice by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of exogenous 19F and 31P probes

    Agatha S. E. Ojugo;Paul M. J. McSheehy;Dominick J. O. McIntyre;Cheryl McCoy

  • Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer; a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS)

    MO Leach;CR Boggis;AK Dixon;DF Easton

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Anwar R. Padhani
Anwar R. Padhani Northwood University
Paul Workman
Paul Workman Institute of Cancer Research
John R. Griffiths
John R. Griffiths University of Manchester
Ian Judson
Ian Judson Institute of Cancer Research
David Atkinson
David Atkinson University of Liverpool
Rosalind A. Eeles
Rosalind A. Eeles Institute of Cancer Research
Fiona J. Gilbert
Fiona J. Gilbert University of Cambridge
Angelo Bifone
Angelo Bifone University of Turin
Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA opens multiple pathways beyond the traditional MD route. Many students explore graduate-level options, such as pursuing online mha programs. These programs provide future healthcare administrators with flexible, accredited opportunities to build leadership skills in healthcare management.

For registered nurses seeking career advancement, there are options like online rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs enable working nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing without additional in-person clinical requirements, making it easier to balance study with employment.

Those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice might consider online dnp programs. The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) qualification can help nurses transition into leadership, policy, or advanced clinical roles. Some students may also look for accessible options, such as dnp programs online, which focus on streamlined admission and graduation tracks.

Online degrees can open doors to many health and medicine-related careers, providing flexible learning suited to different goals and backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Martin O. Leach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles