World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
54
Citations
9814
World Ranking
3980
National Ranking
1541

Mark R. Schleiss publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Schleiss sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 231 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Mark R. Schleiss D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Schleiss sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Schleiss is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has a significant body of research in the field of medicine, with a focus on epidemiology and infectious diseases. Their work spans several subfields including pediatrics, perinatology and child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as obstetrics and gynecology.

Their research topics prominently include cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research, parvovirus B19 infection studies, herpesvirus infections and treatments, neonatal health and biochemistry, pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, virus-based gene therapy research, and the impact of COVID-19 on reproduction.

Among recent publications, the following papers stand out:

  • Sensitivity of Dried Blood Spot Testing for Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection (2021, JAMA Pediatrics)
  • Emerging Concepts in Congenital Cytomegalovirus (2022, PEDIATRICS)
  • SARS-CoV-2: Is it the newest spark in the TORCH? (2020, Journal of Clinical Virology)
  • Impact of breast milk-acquired cytomegalovirus infection in premature infants: Pathogenesis, prevention, and clinical consequences? (2020, Reviews in Medical Virology)
  • Assessment of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Prevalence Among Newborns in Minnesota During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2022, JAMA Network Open)

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with:

  • Nelmary Hernandez-Alvarado
  • Craig J. Bierle
  • Claudia Fernández-Alarcón
  • Erin Osterholm
  • Mark Blackstad

Mark R. Schleiss frequently publishes in venues such as the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Viruses, Pediatric Research, and JAMA Pediatrics. Their research output demonstrates a sustained focus on pediatric infectious diseases and virology.

Best Publications

  • Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy and the neonate: consensus recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

    William D. Rawlinson;Suresh B. Boppana;Karen B. Fowler;David W Kimberlin

  • Neuropathogenesis of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Disease Mechanisms and Prospects for Intervention

    Maxim C.-J. Cheeran;James R. Lokensgard;Mark R. Schleiss

  • Congenital hearing loss.

    Anna M.H. Korver;Richard J.H. Smith;Guy Van Camp;Mark R. Schleiss

  • Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: New Prospects for Prevention and Therapy

    Elizabeth C. Swanson;Mark R. Schleiss

  • Priorities for CMV vaccine development.

    Philip R. Krause;Stephanie R. Bialek;Suresh B. Boppana;Paul D. Griffiths

  • Rapid Intrahost Evolution of Human Cytomegalovirus Is Shaped by Demography and Positive Selection

    Nicholas Renzette;Laura L. Gibson;Bornali Bhattacharjee;Donna Fisher

  • Awareness of and behaviors related to child-to-mother transmission of cytomegalovirus

    Michael J. Cannon;Kyresa Westbrook;Denise Levis;Mark R. Schleiss

  • Limits and patterns of cytomegalovirus genomic diversity in humans

    Nicholas Renzette;Cornelia Pokalyuk;Cornelia Pokalyuk;Laura Gibson;Bornali Bhattacharjee

  • Protection against Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Guinea Pigs, Conferred by a Purified Recombinant Glycoprotein B Vaccine

    Mark R. Schleiss;Nigel Bourne;Greg Stroup;Fernando J. Bravo

  • A Phase 1 Study of 4 Live, Recombinant Human Cytomegalovirus Towne/Toledo Chimeric Vaccines

    Thomas C. Heineman;Mark Schleiss;David I. Bernstein;Richard R. Spaete

  • Update on the current status of cytomegalovirus vaccines.

    Heungsup Sung;Mark R Schleiss

  • DNA immunization confers protective immunity on mice challenged intravaginally with herpes simplex virus type 2

    Nigel Bourne;Gregg N. Milligan;Mark R. Schleiss;David I. Bernstein

  • Progress toward Development of a Vaccine against Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.

    Mark R. Schleiss;Sallie R. Permar;Stanley A. Plotkin

  • Sensitivity of Dried Blood Spot Testing for Detection of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection

    Sheila C. Dollard;Maggie Dreon;Nelmary Hernandez-Alvarado;Minal M. Amin

  • Translational inhibition mediated by a short upstream open reading frame in the human cytomegalovirus gpUL4 (gp48) transcript.

    Catherine R. Degnin;Mark R. Schleiss;Jianhong Cao;Adam P. Geballe

  • Cytomegalovirus Vaccines: Current Status and Future Prospects

    K. M. Anderholm;Craig J Bierle;Mark R Schleiss

  • Effect of Passive Antibody on Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in Guinea Pigs

    Denise F. Bratcher;Nigel Bourne;Fernando J. Bravo;Mark R. Schleiss

  • Cytomegalovirus vaccine development.

    Mark R. Schleiss

  • Transmission of imported vaccine-derived poliovirus in an undervaccinated community in Minnesota

    James P. Alexander;Kristen Ehresmann;Jane Seward;Gary Wax

  • Desirability and feasibility of a vaccine against cytomegalovirus

    Paul Griffiths;Stanley Plotkin;Edward Mocarski;Robert Pass

  • Impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

    Jill C. Beck;John E. Wagner;Todd E. DeFor;Claudio G. Brunstein

Frequent Co-Authors

David I. Bernstein
David I. Bernstein University of Cincinnati
Nigel Bourne
Nigel Bourne The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Stanley A. Plotkin
Stanley A. Plotkin University of Pennsylvania
Adam P. Geballe
Adam P. Geballe Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Dirk P. Dittmer
Dirk P. Dittmer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Timothy F. Kowalik
Timothy F. Kowalik University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Jeffrey D. Jensen
Jeffrey D. Jensen Arizona State University
David P. Witte
David P. Witte Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Sallie R. Permar
Sallie R. Permar Duke University
Don J. Diamond
Don J. Diamond City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Microbiology in the USA, exploring related fields like healthcare information management and medical coding can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals complement their science background with certifications and degrees that enhance their employability and salary potential.

One popular avenue is obtaining Certified Professional Coder credentials. Learning about cpc certification salary and career paths can help microbiology graduates gauge the benefits of pursuing this certification. It provides specialized knowledge relevant to healthcare billing, which is crucial in medical facilities.

Another lucrative option is focusing on healthcare information management, where detailed knowledge of patient data and medical records is essential. Understanding the healthcare information management salary and growth opportunities lets candidates make informed decisions about their future.

For those interested in formal education, programs like the best online cahiim accredited health information management degree programs offer flexible learning routes to gain valuable expertise. Additionally, students seeking quick entry into the field can benefit from exploring the shortest online medical billing and coding certificate programs, which can accelerate career advancement in healthcare support roles.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Schleiss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles