World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4103
World Ranking
11828
National Ranking
199

Adrian Schwaninger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Schwaninger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 173 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Adrian Schwaninger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian Schwaninger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian Schwaninger is affiliated with the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland in Switzerland. Their research work is primarily situated in the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a notable emphasis on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging as well as Social Psychology. The subfields of Biomedical Engineering, Education, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology also feature in their scholarly contributions.

Their research explores various topics including Radiation Dose and Imaging, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Occupational Health and Safety Research, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Online and Blended Learning, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Radiology practices and education.

Schwaninger's recent publications cover a range of subjects focusing on digital learning technologies, human-machine system performance, and stress impacts on cognitive tasks. Some of the recent papers include:

  • Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months' usage, 2021, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
  • Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening, 2020, Applied Ergonomics
  • Evaluation of four digital tools and their perceived impact on active learning, repetition and feedback in a large university class, 2021, Computers & Education
  • Acute Stress Improves Concentration Performance, 2020, Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
  • Why stop after 20 minutes? Breaks and target prevalence in a 60-minute X-ray baggage screening task, 2020, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Frequent collaborators in Schwaninger's research include Yanik Sterchi, Daniela Buser, Juergen Sauer, David A. Sprenger, and David Huegli.

Their work has been published repeatedly in several academic venues, predominantly including Applied Ergonomics, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Virtual Reality, and Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice.

Best Publications

  • An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition

    William G. Hayward;Gillian Rhodes;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Computational Modeling of Face Recognition Based on Psychophysical Experiments

    Adrian Schwaninger;Christian Wallraven;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage

    David A. Sprenger;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Role of Featural and Configural Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition

    Adrian Schwaninger;Janek S. Lobmaier;Stephan M. Collishaw

  • Emotional Exhaustion and Job Satisfaction in Airport Security Officers - Work-Family Conflict as Mediator in the Job Demands-Resources Model.

    Sophie Baeriswyl;Andreas Krause;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence

    Stavros Antifakos;Nicky Kern;Bernt Schiele;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Computer-Based Training Increases Efficiency in X-Ray Image Interpretation by Aviation Security Screeners

    S. Michel;S.M. Koller;J.C. de Ruiter;R. Moerland

  • A model for human interruptability: experimental evaluation and automatic estimation from wearable sensors

    N. Kern;S. Antifakos;B. Schiele;A. Schwaninger

  • Expert face processing: specialisation and constraints

    Adrian Schwaninger;Claus-Christian Carbon;Helmut Leder

  • Using threat image projection data for assessing individual screener performance

    Franziska Hofer;Adrian Schwaninger

  • How Image Based Factors and Human Factors Contribute to Threat Detection Performance in X-Ray Aviation Security Screening

    Anton Bolfing;Tobias Halbherr;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Investigating training, transfer and viewpoint effects resulting from recurrent CBT of X-Ray image interpretation

    Saskia M. Koller;Diana Hardmeier;Stefan Michel;Stefan Michel;Adrian Schwaninger;Adrian Schwaninger

  • Increasing Efficiency in Airport Security Screening

    Adrian Schwaninger

  • Change of search time and non-search time in X-ray baggage screening due to training.

    Saskia M. Koller;Colin G. Drury;Adrian Schwaninger

  • The X-ray object recognition test (X-ray ORT) - a reliable and valid instrument for measuring visual abilities needed in X-ray screening

    D. Hardmeier;F. Hofer;A. Schwaninger

  • Evaluation of CBT for increasing threat detection performance in X-ray screening

    Adrian Schwaninger;Franziska Hofer

  • Measuring visual abilities and visual knowledge of aviation security screeners

    A. Schwaninger;D. Hardmeier;F. Hofer

  • Evaluating the effects of displaying uncertainty in context-aware applications

    Stavros Antifakos;Adrian Schwaninger;Adrian Schwaninger;Bernt Schiele;Bernt Schiele

  • Processing of facial identity and expression: a psychophysical, physiological, and computational perspective.

    Adrian Schwaninger;Christian Wallraven;Douglas W. Cunningham;Sarah D. Chiller-Glaus

  • Airport Security Screener Competency: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis

    Tobias Halbherr;Adrian Schwaninger;Glen R. Budgell;Alan Wales

  • Computer based training: a powerful tool to the enhancement of human factors.

    Adrian Schwaninger

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Christian Wallraven
Christian Wallraven Korea University
Bernt Schiele
Bernt Schiele Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Colin G. Drury
Colin G. Drury University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Stephan Collishaw
Stephan Collishaw Cardiff University
Martin H. Fischer
Martin H. Fischer University of Potsdam
Ulrike Ehlert
Ulrike Ehlert University of Zurich
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Claus-Christian Carbon
Claus-Christian Carbon University of Bamberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online learning opens up diverse career paths connected to Computer Science. Popular options include law enforcement, finance, analytics, and project management. Many students consider the cost of criminal justice degree programs online, which tend to be more affordable than traditional options, enabling a pathway into roles in cybersecurity or digital forensics.

For those interested in business or finance, comparing accounting degree online cost is worthwhile. Online formats can provide flexible schedules and lower tuition fees, making entry into accounting or data-oriented careers more accessible.

Students advancing their tech expertise might look into a cheap online masters in data science. These advanced degrees unlock opportunities in machine learning, AI, and big data analytics, often with a lower financial barrier.

Finally, those eyeing leadership in technology-driven industries may consider an online construction management program. Such programs combine technical skills with project leadership and are available in accelerated, flexible formats.

These pathways highlight the practical advantages of online education, offering affordability, flexibility, and direct routes to growing career fields related to Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian Schwaninger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles