World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
13821
World Ranking
6308
National Ranking
3416

Augustine Osman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Augustine Osman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Augustine Osman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Augustine Osman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Augustine Osman is affiliated with The University of Texas at San Antonio in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the field of Psychology, with a particular emphasis on Clinical Psychology.

Osman's scholarly contributions prominently explore topics related to suicide and self-harm, mental health treatment and access, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, resilience, traumatic brain injury research, and insect and pesticide research. Specific main topics include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Their frequent publication venues reflect a focus on psychological assessment and related health fields. These venues include:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • PLoS ONE
  • Assessment
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

Osman collaborates with several co-authors who regularly appear in their publications. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Bob Lew
  • Jenny Mei Yiu Huen
  • Mansor Abu Talib
  • Angel Nga Man Leung
  • Ching Sin Siau

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on cross-cultural and clinical aspects of suicidality and mental health. Notable papers include:

  • "Meaning in life as a protective factor against suicidal tendencies in Chinese University students," 2020, published in BMC Psychiatry
  • "The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and its Chinese version (C-SBQ-R): Further validity testing using the culture, comprehension, and translation bias procedure," 2022, published in Psychological Assessment
  • "A comparison between American and Chinese college students on suicide-related behavior parameters," 2020, published in International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
  • "Suicidality among Chinese college students: A cross-sectional study across seven provinces," 2020, published in PLoS ONE
  • "Religious affiliation and suicidality among college students in China: A cross-sectional study across six provinces," 2021, published in PLoS ONE

These works indicate a sustained research interest in understanding suicidal behaviors, assessment validation in different cultural contexts, and the factors influencing suicidality among college student populations. The combination of clinical and social psychology perspectives characterizes the overarching approach of Osman's research agenda.

Best Publications

  • The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples

    Augustine Osman;Courtney L. Bagge;Peter M. Gutierrez;Lisa C. Konick

  • The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates.

    Augustine Osman;Jane L. Wong;Courtney L. Bagge;Stacey Freedenthal

  • The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples.

    Augustine Osman;Francisco X. Barrios;Peter M. Gutierrez;Beverly A. Kopper

  • Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    Augustine Osman;Francisco X. Barrios;Beverly A. Kopper;Wendy Hauptmann

  • The general belongingness scale (gbs): Assessing achieved belongingness

    Glenn P. Malone;David R. Pillow;Augustine Osman

  • The Beck Anxiety Inventory: Reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties

    Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios;Joylene R. Osman

  • Reliability and validity of the Beck depression inventory--II with adolescent psychiatric inpatients.

    Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Frank Barrios;Peter M. Gutierrez

  • Development and initial validation of the self-harm behavior questionnaire

    Peter M. Gutierrez;Augustine Osman;Francisco X. Barrios;Beverly A. Kopper

  • Factor structure and psychometric characteristics of the beck depression inventory-II

    Augustine Osman;William R. Downs;Francisco X. Barrios;Beverly A. Kopper

  • The positive and negative suicide ideation inventory: development and validation

    Augustine Osman;Peter M. Gutierrez;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios

  • Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in nonclinical adolescent samples.

    Augustine Osman;Francisco X. Barrios;Peter M. Gutierrez;John E. Williams

  • The Reasons for Living Inventory for Adolescents (RFL-A): development and psychometric properties

    Augustine Osman;William R. Downs;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios

  • Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.

    Augustine Osman;Joseph Hoffman;Francisco X. Barrios;Beverly A. Kopper

  • The social phobia and social interaction anxiety scales: Evaluation of psychometric properties

    Augustine Osman;Peter M. Gutierrez;Francisco X. Barrios;Beverly A. Kopper

  • The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support: Analyses of Internal Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Correlates Across Gender

    Augustine Osman;Dorian A. Lamis;Stacey Freedenthal;Peter M. Gutierrez

  • The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Further Examination of Dimensionality, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity Estimates.

    Augustine Osman;Dorian A. Lamis;Courtney L. Bagge;Stacey Freedenthal

  • Validation of the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire and the Reasons for Living Inventory in an adult psychiatric inpatient sample

    Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Marsha M. Linehan;Francisco X. Barrios

  • The beck anxiety inventory: Psychometric properties in a community population

    Augustine Osman;Francisco X. Barrios;Diane Aukes;Joylene R. Osman

  • Suicide risk assessment in a college student population.

    Peter M. Gutierrez;Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios

  • Why young people do not kill themselves: the reasons for living inventory for adolescents.

    Peter M. Gutierrez;Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Gutierrez
Peter M. Gutierrez Florida State University
Courtney L. Bagge
Courtney L. Bagge University of Michigan Medical School
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Dorian A. Lamis
Dorian A. Lamis Emory University
Marsha M. Linehan
Marsha M. Linehan University of Washington
Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp
Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
Paul S. F. Yip
Paul S. F. Yip University of Hong Kong
Kairi Kõlves
Kairi Kõlves Griffith University
Jie Zhang
Jie Zhang Central University of Finance and Economics
Michael R. Nadorff
Michael R. Nadorff Mississippi State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA not only opens pathways in traditional fields but also offers a variety of online programs that cater to working professionals and students at different stages of their education. Online psychology degrees are popular for their flexibility and comprehensive curriculum, and many students leverage them as a step toward specialized careers.

A growing career pathway in psychology is becoming a mental health counselor. Each city or state may have its unique licensure requirements and career opportunities. For instance, those interested in working in urban California settings can explore the mental health counselor requirements in San Francisco or learn how to become a mental health counselor in San Jose. Professionals exploring Southern California can look into becoming a mental health counselor in Santa Ana. Those considering relocating or practicing out of state might want to research how to become a mental health counselor in Scottsdale.

Online degrees and these diverse career pathways allow you to tailor your education for goals in counseling, research, or clinical practice while meeting local and state professional requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Augustine Osman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles