World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9711 9085 5129 4680 69 8216

Courtney L. Bagge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Courtney L. Bagge between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Courtney L. Bagge published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2024. 15 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2024. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 4 publications
1998 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Courtney L. Bagge: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 2
2012 3
2013 9
2014 5
2015 2
2016 5
2017 5
2018 5
2019 5
2020 1
2021 6
2022 3
2023 2
2024 11
2025 4
Total 86
Download as CSV

Courtney L. Bagge publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Courtney L. Bagge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 69
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Courtney L. Bagge D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Courtney L. Bagge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Courtney L. Bagge is affiliated with the University of Michigan Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and medicine, with a particular emphasis on suicide and self-harm studies.

Their work frequently appears in academic venues such as Psychiatry Research, JAMA Network Open, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, General Hospital Psychiatry, and the Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Bagge's research covers a range of topics including:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Their primary fields of study include Psychology and Medicine, with subfields focused on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Among recent papers authored by or associated with Bagge are:

  • Perceived Utility and Characterization of Personal Google Search Histories to Detect Data Patterns Proximal to a Suicide Attempt in Individuals Who Previously Attempted Suicide: Pilot Cohort Study (2021), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Machine Learning to Classify Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Implementation Within the Common Data Elements Used by the Military Suicide Research Consortium (2021), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • Sex-Specific Association of Alcohol Use Disorder With Suicide Mortality (2024), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Alcohol use and the gender-specific risk of suicidal behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (2022), published in Systematic Reviews
  • Proportion of Individuals With Past-Year Suicidal Ideation Who Attempted Suicide Over the Past 10 Years in the United States, and the Influence of Age and Sex (2020), published in Crisis

Frequent collaborators include Andrew K. Littlefield, Shannon Lange, Jürgen Rehm, Charlotte Probst, and Kevin G. Saulnier, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to topics around mental health and substance use.

Best Publications

  • The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples

    Augustine Osman;Courtney L. Bagge;Peter M. Gutierrez;Lisa C. Konick

  • The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates.

    Augustine Osman;Jane L. Wong;Courtney L. Bagge;Stacey Freedenthal

  • Reliability and validity of the Beck depression inventory--II with adolescent psychiatric inpatients.

    Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Frank Barrios;Peter M. Gutierrez

  • Clarifying the role of emotion dysregulation in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in an undergraduate sample.

    Michael D. Anestis;Michael D. Anestis;Courtney L. Bagge;Matthew T. Tull;Thomas E. Joiner

  • A meta-analysis of acute use of alcohol and the risk of suicide attempt.

    Guilherme Borges;Courtney Bagge;Cheryl J. Cherpitel;Kenneth Conner

  • Borderline personality disorder features predict negative outcomes 2 years later.

    Courtney Bagge;Angela Nickell;Stephanie Stepp;Christine Durrett

  • Quantifying the impact of recent negative life events on suicide attempts.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Catherine Rose Glenn;Han-Joo Lee

  • A literature review and meta-analyses of cannabis use and suicidality

    Guilherme Borges;Courtney L. Bagge;Ricardo Orozco

  • The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Further Examination of Dimensionality, Reliability, and Concurrent Validity Estimates.

    Augustine Osman;Dorian A. Lamis;Courtney L. Bagge;Stacey Freedenthal

  • Validation of the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire and the Reasons for Living Inventory in an adult psychiatric inpatient sample

    Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Marsha M. Linehan;Francisco X. Barrios

  • Adolescent alcohol involvement and suicide attempts: Toward the development of a conceptual framework

    Courtney L. Bagge;Kenneth J. Sher

  • Suicide risk assessment in a college student population.

    Peter M. Gutierrez;Augustine Osman;Beverly A. Kopper;Francisco X. Barrios

  • Relations between hopelessness, depressive symptoms and suicidality: mediation by reasons for living.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Dorian Ashley Lamis;Michael Nadorff;Augustine Osman

  • Alcohol as an acute risk factor for recent suicide attempts: a case-crossover analysis.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Han-Joo Lee;Julie A. Schumacher;Kim L. Gratz

  • Extending extant models of the pathogenesis of borderline personality disorder to childhood borderline personality symptoms: the roles of affective dysfunction, disinhibition, and self- and emotion-regulation deficits.

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull;Elizabeth K. Reynolds;Courtney L. Bagge

  • Empirical extension of the interpersonal theory of suicide: Investigating the role of interpersonal hopelessness.

    Raymond P. Tucker;Christopher R. Hagan;Ryan M. Hill;Meredith L. Slish

  • Near-term predictors of the intensity of suicidal ideation: an examination of the 24 h prior to a recent suicide attempt.

    Courtney L. Bagge;Andrew K. Littlefield;Kenneth R. Conner;Julie A. Schumacher

  • DAPP-BQ: factor structure and relations to personality disorder symptoms in a non-clinical sample.

    Courtney L Bagge;Timothy J Trull

  • The moderating role of distress tolerance in the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters and suicidal behavior among trauma exposed substance users in residential treatment.

    Michael D. Anestis;Matthew T. Tull;Courtney L. Bagge;Kim L. Gratz

  • Alcohol and suicidal behavior: What is known and what can be done

    Kenneth R. Conner;Kenneth R. Conner;Courtney L. Bagge;David B. Goldston;Mark A. Ilgen

  • Reynolds adolescent depression scale-second edition: a reliable and useful instrument.

    Augustine Osman;Peter M. Gutierrez;Courtney L. Bagge;Qijuan Fang

Frequent Co-Authors

Augustine Osman
Augustine Osman The University of Texas at San Antonio
Peter M. Gutierrez
Peter M. Gutierrez Florida State University
Kenneth R. Conner
Kenneth R. Conner University of Rochester Medical Center
Matthew T. Tull
Matthew T. Tull University of Toledo
Han-Joo Lee
Han-Joo Lee University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Kim L. Gratz
Kim L. Gratz University of Toledo
Andrew K. Littlefield
Andrew K. Littlefield Texas Tech University
Michael D. Anestis
Michael D. Anestis Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Timothy J. Trull
Timothy J. Trull University of Missouri
Catherine R. Glenn
Catherine R. Glenn Old Dominion University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a broad selection of career opportunities in counseling, therapy, and mental health support. Many students opt for programs specializing in clinical, school, or rehabilitation counseling, as these are closely aligned with career growth in healthcare and social services.

When considering educational options, it's helpful to review top-ranked counseling degree programs in Michigan to understand what makes certain programs stand out. Regional preferences often influence program selection, as some areas offer distinct specializations and strong professional networks. For instance, you can explore popular counseling degrees in New Jersey, popular counseling degrees in Philadelphia, and most popular counseling degree programs in San Francisco for further guidance.

Graduates from these programs can pursue licensure as counselors, therapists, or social workers, and may work in schools, hospitals, or private practice. Online options provide flexibility, allowing students to balance studies with personal and professional obligations, while preparing for rewarding roles that make a difference in people's lives.

Best Scientists Citing Courtney L. Bagge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles