World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2831 2596 1635 1466 277 16195

Edward C. Chang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edward C. Chang between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edward C. Chang published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2019. 22 of the 316 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2019. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
1976 2026

316 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edward C. Chang: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 6
1997 5
1998 10
1999 3
2000 4
2001 12
2002 5
2003 13
2004 6
2005 1
2006 6
2007 7
2008 7
2009 6
2010 5
2011 6
2012 14
2013 12
2014 11
2015 16
2016 21
2017 20
2018 15
2019 23
2020 21
2021 13
2022 8
2023 5
2024 10
2025 21
2026 1
Total 316
Download as CSV

Edward C. Chang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward C. Chang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 277 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 277
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Edward C. Chang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward C. Chang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Edward C. Chang is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with significant contributions spanning social psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and health.

The body of work by Edward C. Chang covers a range of topics within psychology, emphasizing areas such as:

  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • The Humanistic Psychologist
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Journal of Humanistic Psychology
  • Current Psychology

Edward C. Chang has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Olivia D. Chang
  • Nicolás Sánchez-Álvarez
  • Natalio Extremera
  • Lourdes Rey
  • Elizabeth A. Yu

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on psychological well-being and social factors, including:

  • "Perceived Social Support Protects Lonely People Against COVID-19 Anxiety: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in China" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Relational meaning in life as a predictor of interpersonal well-being: A prospective analysis" (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • "Frequency of Suicidal Ideation Inventory: Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version" (2020, Psicothema)
  • "Loneliness, social problem solving, and negative affective symptoms: Negative problem orientation as a key mechanism" (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • "Basic psychological needs and negative affective conditions in Chinese adolescents: Does coping still matter?" (2021, Personality and Individual Differences)

Edward C. Chang's research encompasses multiple quantitative and longitudinal methodologies within psychological science aimed at understanding interpersonal well-being, coping mechanisms, and mental health in diverse populations.

Best Publications

  • OPTIMISM AND PESSIMISM AS PARTIALLY INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTS: RELATIONSHIP TO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING

    Edward C. Chang;Albert Maydeu-Olivares;Thomas J. D'Zurilla

  • Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: some implications for theory and practice.

    Edward C. Chang

  • Cultural Differences in Optimism, Pessimism, and Coping: Predictors of Subsequent Adjustment in Asian American and Caucasian American College Students.

    Edward C. Chang

  • Dispositional optimism and primary and secondary appraisal of a stressor: Controlling for confounding influences and relations to coping and psychological and physical adjustment.

    Edward C. Chang

  • Assessing the dimensionality of optimism and pessimism using a multimeasure approach

    Edward C. Chang;Thomas J. D'Zurilla;Albert Maydeu-Olivares

  • Social problem-solving deficits and hopelessness, depression, and suicidal risk in college students and psychiatric inpatients

    Thomas J. D'Zurilla;Edward C. Chang;Edgar J. Nottingham;Lino Faccini

  • The positive psychology of negative thinking

    Julie K. Norem;Edward C. Chang

  • How Adaptive and Maladaptive Perfectionism Relate to Positive and Negative Psychological Functioning: Testing a Stress-Mediation Model in Black and White Female College Students.

    Edward C. Chang;Angela F. Watkins;Kira Hudson Banks

  • The relations between social problem solving and coping

    Thomas J. D'Zurilla;Edward C. Chang

  • Social problem solving: Theory, research, and training.

    Edward C. Chang;Thomas J. D'Zurilla;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Perfectionism as a Predictor of Positive and Negative Psychological Outcomes: Examining a Mediation Model in Younger and Older Adults.

    Edward C. Chang

  • Optimism, pessimism, and positive and negative affectivity in middle-aged adults: a test of a cognitive-affective model of psychological adjustment

    Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Cultural differences, perfectionism, and suicidal risk in a college population: Does social problem solving still matter?

    Edward C. Chang

  • The influence of hope on appraisals, coping, and dysphoria : A test of hope theory

    Edward C. Chang;Shawna L. DeSimone

  • Does dispositional optimism moderate the relation between perceived stress and psychological well-being?: a preliminary investigation

    Edward C. Chang

  • SELF-ESTEEM AND SOCIAL PROBLEM SOLVING AS PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSION IN COLLEGE STUDENTS

    Thomas J. D'zurilla;Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Optimism and risk for job burnout among working college students: stress as a mediator

    Edward C Chang;Kevin L Rand;Daniel R Strunk

  • Perfectionism as a predictor of subsequent adjustment : Evidence for a specific diathesis-stress mechanism among college students

    Edward C. Chang;Kevin L. Rand

  • Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice.

    Edward C. Chang

  • Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events?

    Edward C. Chang;Kiyoshi Asakawa;Lawrence J. Sanna

Frequent Co-Authors

Jameson K. Hirsch
Jameson K. Hirsch East Tennessee State University
Lawrence J. Sanna
Lawrence J. Sanna University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Elizabeth L. Jeglic
Elizabeth L. Jeglic John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Thomas J. D'Zurilla
Thomas J. D'Zurilla Stony Brook University
Fuschia M. Sirois
Fuschia M. Sirois University of Sheffield
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University
Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Natalio Extremera
Natalio Extremera University of Malaga
Christopher Peterson
Christopher Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nadine J. Kaslow
Nadine J. Kaslow Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology unlocks a range of diverse career opportunities, both in clinical and non-clinical settings. Many students choose related online programs to build foundational skills essential for roles such as counseling, behavioral therapy, and speech-language pathology.

One popular career pathway involves helping individuals with communication challenges. For example, those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Hawaii will find unique state-specific requirements, including licensure and advanced degrees. Similarly, learning how to become a speech language pathologist in Idaho can guide you through necessary certification steps and coursework.

Aspiring professionals should also review state-specific standards, such as the Illinois slp certification requirements and Indiana slp certification requirements. These resources outline required degree levels, clinical experience, and exams that ensure you are fully prepared to serve clients effectively.

Whether you are starting your journey or considering further specialization, online degrees and certifications can provide the flexibility and expert training you need to advance your career in the vast field of psychology and allied health.

Best Scientists Citing Edward C. Chang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles