World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shanmukh V. Kamble

Shanmukh V. Kamble

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9871 9238 4 4 177 5077

Shanmukh V. Kamble publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shanmukh V. Kamble between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shanmukh V. Kamble published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 30 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
2009 2025

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shanmukh V. Kamble: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 4
2011 5
2012 7
2013 4
2014 18
2015 19
2016 23
2017 8
2018 15
2019 7
2020 22
2021 12
2022 14
2023 9
2024 12
2025 18
Total 199
Download as CSV

Shanmukh V. Kamble publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shanmukh V. Kamble sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 177
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Shanmukh V. Kamble D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shanmukh V. Kamble sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shanmukh V. Kamble is affiliated with Karnatak University in India and focuses on research within psychology and social sciences. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics of their research encompass cultural differences and values, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, COVID-19 and mental health, social and intergroup psychology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, bullying, victimization and aggression, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Their recent publications feature research articles such as:

  • "Psychological distress in North America during COVID-19: The role of pandemic-related stressors" (2021, Social Science & Medicine)
  • "Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries" (2020, Journal of Personality)
  • "Structure of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Across Eight World Regions" (2020, Assessment)
  • "Gratitude in collectivist and individualist cultures" (2020, The Journal of Positive Psychology)
  • "A systems perspective on human flourishing: Exploring cross-country similarities and differences of a multisystemic flourishing network" (2022, The Journal of Positive Psychology)

Shanmukh V. Kamble frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Narine Khachatryan
  • Mladen Adamovic
  • Sergiu Bălţătescu
  • Dzintra Iliško
  • Joonha Park

Publications by Kamble frequently appear in notable venues such as:

  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Psychology
  • International Journal of Wellbeing
  • BMC Psychology

The bulk of Kamble's academic output is situated in the wider field of psychology, with a significant emphasis on the social aspects and clinical dimensions within the discipline. Their research topics emphasize cross-cultural psychological phenomena, well-being, and social psychological processes, including responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • To Belong Is to Matter Sense of Belonging Enhances Meaning in Life

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Tyler F. Stillman;Joshua A. Hicks;Shanmukh Kamble

  • Universals and cultural variations in 22 emotional expressions across five cultures.

    Daniel T. Cordaro;Rui Sun;Dacher Keltner;Shanmukh Kamble

  • Heterogeneity of long-history migration explains cultural differences in reports of emotional expressivity and the functions of smiles

    Magdalena Rychlowska;Magdalena Rychlowska;Yuri Miyamoto;David Matsumoto;Ursula Hess

  • Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies

    Gregory A. Bryant;Daniel M. T. Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Psychological distress in North America during COVID-19: The role of pandemic-related stressors.

    Jason Zheng;Talia Morstead;Nancy Sin;Patrick Klaiber

  • Compassion and contamination. Cultural differences in vegetarianism.

    Matthew B. Ruby;Steven J. Heine;Shanmukh Kamble;Tessa K. Cheng

  • Belief in a just world, teacher justice, and bullying behavior.

    Matthias Donat;Sören Umlauft;Claudia Dalbert;Shanmukh V. Kamble

  • Belief in a just world and well-being of bullies, victims and defenders: a study with Portuguese and Indian students.

    Isabel Correia;Shanmukh V. Kamble;Claudia Dalbert

  • Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia): A multi-national study involving 73 countries

    Rene T. Proyer;Willibald Ruch;Numan S. Ali;Hmoud S. Al-Olimat

  • The Meaning of Students’ Personal Belief in a Just World for Positive and Negative Aspects of School-Specific Well-Being

    Matthias Donat;Felix Peter;Claudia Dalbert;Shanmukh V. Kamble

  • Peer Attachment and Cyber Aggression Involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese Adolescents

    Michelle F. Wright;Ikuko Aoyama;Shanmukh V. Kamble;Zheng Li

  • Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries.

    Peter K. Jonason;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Jarosław Piotrowski;Constantine Sedikides

  • Life balance and well-being : testing a novel conceptual and measurement approach

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Robert Cummins;Shanmukh Kamble

  • The mental health continuum-short form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies-A 38 nation study.

    Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Jarosław P. Piotrowski;Evgeny N. Osin;Jan Cieciuch

  • Cross-cultural differences and similarities in human value instantiation.

    Paul Hanel;Paul Hanel;Gregory Maio;Gregory Maio;Ana Karla Silva Soares;Katia C. Vione;Katia C. Vione

  • Self-control, diet concerns and eater prototypes influence fatty foods consumption of adolescents in three countries

    Joanne H Gerrits;Ross E O'Hara;Bettina F Piko;Frederick X Gibbons

  • Belief in a just world and wellbeing in Indian schools.

    Shanmukh V. Kamble;Claudia Dalbert

  • CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP: COMPARISON OF BULGARIA, INDIA, AND THE UNITED STATES

    Iva Katzarska-miller;Stephen Reysen;Shanmukh V. Kamble;Nandini Vithoji

  • Indian mate preferences: Continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century

    Shanmukh Kamble;Todd K. Shackelford;Michael Pham;David M. Buss

  • The recognition of 18 facial-bodily expressions across nine cultures.

    Daniel T. Cordaro;Rui Sun;Shanmukh Kamble;Niranjan Hodder

  • Adolescents' Cheating and Delinquent Behavior from a Justice-Psychological Perspective: The Role of Teacher Justice.

    Matthias Donat;Claudia Dalbert;Shanmukh Vasant Kamble

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle F. Wright
Michelle F. Wright Indiana State University
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Edward C. Chang
Edward C. Chang University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregory R. Maio
Gregory R. Maio University of Bath
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia Federal University of Paraíba
Etienne Mullet
Etienne Mullet École Pratique des Hautes Études
Claudia Dalbert
Claudia Dalbert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
John Maltby
John Maltby University of Leicester
Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open the door to diverse and rewarding career paths, with substance abuse counseling being a popular option. Many aspiring professionals now opt for related online degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work, offering flexibility for those balancing work or family commitments. Online study can provide direct pathways to certification or licensure in various states.

If you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Scottsdale, it’s important to understand the academic and practical requirements needed for the field. Each state may differ. For instance, those curious about Seattle substance abuse counselor certification requirements will find that Washington State emphasizes both education and hands-on experience.

Additionally, exploring the Spokane substance abuse counselors education requirements or the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis can help you assess your steps in securing a professional role. Online degrees in psychology offer a convenient way to develop foundational knowledge and meet many statewide prerequisites for licensing in substance abuse counseling and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Shanmukh V. Kamble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles