World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
17776
World Ranking
2477
National Ranking
1437

Paul J. Watson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Watson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 293 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul J. Watson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Watson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Watson was affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in the United States. Their research spanned various intersections of social sciences, with a focus on health, education, clinical psychology, and genetics. The scholar contributed to understanding topics related to religion, spirituality, and psychology; education and Islamic studies; grief, bereavement, and mental health; as well as connective tissue disorders research.

Their publication record includes papers covering complex subjects such as coping mechanisms in childhood trauma within religious contexts and neurodevelopmental disorders among children with specific genetic conditions. Notable papers authored or coauthored by Watson include:

  • "Recollections of Childhood Sexual Abuse: Complexities of Religious Coping and Muslim Religious and Psychological Adjustment in Afghanistan," published in 2021 in the Journal of Religion and Health
  • "The Colour of Madness, Edited by Samara Linton & Rianna Walcott," published in 2021 in DCP-S Review
  • "The prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders in a large UK cohort of children with achondroplasia," published in 2025 in Endocrine Abstracts

Watson collaborated with several frequent co-authors throughout their career. These included Nima Ghorbani, Zhuo Job Chen, Fatema Ghafari, Guanglin Liu, and Amira Oudeh. Their work was published across diverse academic outlets, reflecting a range in research interests and interdisciplinary approaches. Key publication venues for their work were:

  • Journal of Religion and Health
  • DCP-S Review
  • Endocrine Abstracts

The researcher's inquiries primarily engaged with the intersection of psychological adjustment and religious frameworks, as well as clinical and genetic dimensions of health. Their subfields of study, such as clinical psychology and genetics, indicate an integration between behavioral sciences and biomedical aspects in their research.

Paul J. Watson's contributions covered broad and complex issues, integrating social and medical sciences, and encompassed topics that addressed mental health, education within religious contexts, and genetic conditions affecting child populations. Their work is notable for its interdisciplinary nature and breadth across social sciences and health-related fields.

Best Publications

  • Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

    Steve R. Woby;Steve R. Woby;Neil K. Roach;Martin Urmston;Martin Urmston;Paul J. Watson

  • Early Identification and Management of Psychological Risk Factors (“Yellow Flags”) in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Reappraisal

    Michael K Nicholas;Steven J Linton;Paul J Watson;Chris J Main

  • Trunk Muscle Stabilization Training Plus General Exercise Versus General Exercise Only: Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain

    George A Koumantakis;Paul J Watson;Jacqueline A Oldham

  • Narcissism and empathy: validity evidence for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

    P.J. Watson;Stephanie O. Grisham;Marjorie V. Trotter;Michael D. Biderman

  • The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design☆

    P.J. Watson;Edward A. Workman

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

    Fujian Song;N. Freemantle;T. A. Sheldon;A. House

  • Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection

    Paul J. Watson;Randy Thornhill

  • Sexual Conflict and the Energetic Costs of Mating and Mate Choice in Water Striders

    P J Watson;Göran Arnqvist;R R Stallmann

  • Toward a revised evolutionary adaptationist analysis of depression: the social navigation hypothesis.

    Paul J Watson;Paul W Andrews

  • Self-efficacy mediates the relation between pain-related fear and outcome in chronic low back pain patients.

    Steve R. Woby;Steve R. Woby;Martin Urmston;Martin Urmston;Paul J. Watson

  • Dimensions of the Mysticism Scale: Confirming the Three‐Factor Structure in the United States and Iran

    Ralph W. Hood;Nima Ghorbani;P. J. Watson;Ahad Framarz Ghramaleki

  • Are changes in fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and appraisals of control, predictive of changes in chronic low back pain and disability?

    Steve R Woby;Steve R Woby;Paul J Watson;Neil K Roach;Martin Urmston

  • Self-Compassion in Iranian Muslims: Relationships With Integrative Self-Knowledge, Mental Health, and Religious Orientation

    Nima Ghorbani;P. J. Watson;Zhuo Chen;Fatemeh Norballa

  • Narcissistic Personality Inventory factors, splitting, and self-consciousness.

    P.J. Watson;Michael D. Biderman

  • Narcissism empathy and social desirability

    P.J. Watson;Ronald J. Morris

  • Nonmotor Functions of the Cerebellum

    Watson Pj

  • Self-reported emotional intelligence: Construct similarity and functional dissimilarity of higher-order processing in Iran and the United States

    Nima Ghorbani;Mark N. Bing;P. J. Watson;H. Kristl Davison

  • Psychological aspects of pain.

    C.J. Main;P.J. Watson

  • Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain-management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice

    EM Hay;R Mullis;M Lewis;K Vohora

  • The relation between cognitive factors and levels of pain and disability in chronic low back pain patients presenting for physiotherapy.

    Steve R. Woby;Neil K. Roach;Martin Urmston;Martin Urmston;Paul J. Watson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph W. Hood
Ralph W. Hood University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Chris J. Main
Chris J. Main Keele University
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze University College London
Elaine M. Hay
Elaine M. Hay Keele University
James Mason
James Mason University of Warwick
Nick Freemantle
Nick Freemantle University College London
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University
Troels S. Jensen
Troels S. Jensen Aarhus University
Randy Thornhill
Randy Thornhill University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse online programs and career opportunities, especially in human services and social work. Many students consider the direct pathway from psychology studies to social work roles, which typically require specialized qualifications depending on the state.

For example, the Minnesota minimum degree requirement for social workers often includes a bachelor’s or master’s in social work from an accredited institution. In contrast, the social worker degree requirements in Mississippi emphasize state-specific coursework and supervised experience.

Similarly, understanding the Missouri minimum degree requirement for social workers or the social worker education requirements in Montana is vital if you are considering practicing in those regions. Each state may have unique requirements around licensing, internships, and graduate study, so researching these details can help you choose the right online degree and set a foundation for your career.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Watson

Recently Published Articles