World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7989 7457 788 752 141 5757

Matteo Cella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matteo Cella between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matteo Cella published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 28 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 11 publications
2007 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matteo Cella: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 8
2011 8
2012 12
2013 4
2014 17
2015 9
2016 6
2017 9
2018 7
2019 11
2020 13
2021 11
2022 13
2023 12
2024 17
2025 11
Total 175
Download as CSV

Matteo Cella publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Cella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matteo Cella D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Cella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matteo Cella is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on research within the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics of their research cover a broad spectrum related to mental health, with a particular emphasis on Schizophrenia research and treatment, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Mental Health Research Topics, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

Matteo Cella has frequently collaborated with various coauthors, including Til Wykes, Dimosthenis Tsapekos, Allan H. Young, Lucia Valmaggia, and Rebecca Strawbridge. Their research contributions appear regularly in specific academic venues such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Medicine, Journal of Psychiatric Research, and Psychiatry Research.

Recent significant publications by Matteo Cella include:

  • Cognitive remediation for inpatients with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Psychosocial and behavioural interventions for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a systematic review of efficacy meta-analyses, 2023, The British Journal of Psychiatry

Other notable papers connected to their research interests include:

  • Cognitive impairment in people with schizophrenia: an umbrella review, 2022, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • Advances in the use of virtual reality to treat mental health conditions, 2024, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Cognitive remediation therapy for patients with bipolar disorder: A randomised proof-of-concept trial, 2020, Bipolar Disorders

Best Publications

  • Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings.

    Matteo Cella;Trudie Chalder

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Impaired flexible decision-making in major depressive disorder

    Matteo Cella;Simon Dymond;Andrew Cooper

  • Cognitive remediation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A network meta-analysis

    Matteo Cella;Antonio Preti;Clementine Edwards;Tabitha Dow

  • Randomized-controlled trials in people at ultra high risk of psychosis: A review of treatment effectiveness

    Antonio Preti;Matteo Cella

  • Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation

    Patrick Robinson;Daniel Turk;Sagar Jilka;Matteo Cella;Matteo Cella

  • The Automatic Detection of Chronic Pain-Related Expression: Requirements, Challenges and the Multimodal EmoPain Dataset

    Min S. H. Aung;Sebastian Kaltwang;Bernardino Romera-Paredes;Brais Martinez

  • Symptom Dimensions of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales in Psychosis: A Multisite Study

    Todd S. Woodward;Kwanghee Jung;Heungsun Hwang;John Yin

  • Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task.

    Matteo Cella;Simon Dymond;Andrew Cooper;Oliver Turnbull

  • A new generation computerised metacognitive cognitive remediation programme for schizophrenia (CIRCuiTS): a randomised controlled trial.

    C Reeder;VC Huddy;M Cella;R Taylor

  • Measuring disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Matteo Cella;Michael Sharpe;Trudie Chalder

  • Social cognition interventions for people with schizophrenia: a systematic review focussing on methodological quality and intervention modality

    Nina Grant;Megan Lawrence;Antonio Preti;Til Wykes

  • Gender and duration of untreated psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Maria Teresa Cascio;Matteo Cella;Matteo Cella;Antonio Preti;Anna Meneghelli

  • The Feasibility and Acceptability to Service Users of CIRCuiTS, a Computerized Cognitive Remediation Therapy Programme for Schizophrenia.

    Clare Reeder;Victoria Pile;Polly Crawford;Matteo Cella

  • Using wearable technology to detect the autonomic signature of illness severity in schizophrenia

    Matteo Cella;Łukasz Okruszek;Megan Lawrence;Valerio Zarlenga

  • Cognitions, behaviours and co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

    Matteo Cella;P. D. White;M. Sharpe;Trudie Chalder

  • Metacognitive awareness of cognitive problems in schizophrenia: exploring the role of symptoms and self-esteem.

    Matteo Cella;S Swan;E Medin;Clare Reeder

  • Cognitive remediation for inpatients with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Matteo Cella;Tom Price;Holly Corboy;Juliana Onwumere

  • The relationship between dysphoria and proneness to hallucination and delusions among young adults.

    Matteo Cella;Andrew Cooper;Simon O. Dymond;Phil Reed

  • Cognitive remediation therapy for patients with bipolar disorder: a randomised proof-of-concept trial

    Rebecca Strawbridge;Dimosthenis Tsapekos;John Hodsoll;Tim Mantingh

  • The nuts and bolts of Cognitive Remediation: Exploring how different training components relate to cognitive and functional gains

    Matteo Cella;Matteo Cella;Til Wykes

  • Cognitive remediation therapy for schizophrenia

    Matteo Cella;Vyvyan Huddy;Clare Reeder;Til Wykes

Frequent Co-Authors

Til Wykes
Til Wykes King's College London
Antonio Preti
Antonio Preti University of Turin
Andrea Raballo
Andrea Raballo University of Perugia
Allan H. Young
Allan H. Young King's College London
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Simon Dymond
Simon Dymond Swansea University
Nicholas Tarrier
Nicholas Tarrier University of Manchester
Trudie Chalder
Trudie Chalder King's College London
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Andrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Watson University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and career options, especially in the field of counseling. With the demand for qualified mental health professionals on the rise, online programs now offer flexible pathways for students nationwide.

Pursuing a counseling degree can lead to careers in clinical settings, schools, community agencies, or private practice. Many online programs are tailored to fit busy schedules while still meeting licensure requirements. Looking for localized options? Some of the top counseling degree programs in San Diego provide strong foundations in multicultural counseling and clinical skills. Similarly, the best counseling degree programs in Seattle emphasize evidence-based practice and innovative teaching methods.

For students in the southern United States, there are several South counseling degree programs that offer online flexibility combined with local internship opportunities. Other regions, such as Central California, boast institutions ranked among the best counseling program rankings in Stockton, providing additional options for specialized study.

Best Scientists Citing Matteo Cella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles