World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9906 9272 5229 4776 98 4786

R. Scott Mackin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by R. Scott Mackin between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. R. Scott Mackin published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 30 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
2000 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
R. Scott Mackin: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 3
2011 6
2012 8
2013 0
2014 7
2015 3
2016 6
2017 2
2018 10
2019 10
2020 10
2021 17
2022 12
2023 12
2024 12
2025 18
Total 145
Download as CSV

R. Scott Mackin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Mackin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

R. Scott Mackin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Mackin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

R. Scott Mackin is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and psychology, particularly focusing on psychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology. The subfields where they have contributed include psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

The main topics addressed in their work cover a broad scope in neuroscience and mental health research:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Mental Health Research Topics

The scientist's recent publications reflect an emphasis on neuroimaging, late-life depression, and Alzheimer's disease. These include:

  • Characterizing Heterogeneity in Neuroimaging, Cognition, Clinical Symptoms, and Genetics Among Patients With Late-Life Depression (2022, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • Association of Sleep and β-Amyloid Pathology Among Older Cognitively Unimpaired Adults (2021, JAMA Network Open)
  • Late-Life Depression Is Associated With Reduced Cortical Amyloid Burden: Findings From the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Depression Project (2020, Biological Psychiatry)
  • Effects of sex, race, ethnicity, and education on online aging research participation (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions)
  • Association of Midlife Depressive Symptoms with Regional Amyloid-β and Tau in the Framingham Heart Study (2021, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease)

Frequent publication venues for R. Scott Mackin include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research

Collaboration plays a significant role in their work, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Michael W. Weiner
  • Rachel L. Nosheny
  • Miriam T. Ashford
  • Monica R. Camacho
  • Diana Truran

This combination of collaborations, publication venues, and topics suggests a focus on the intersection of depression, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, particularly Alzheimer's disease. The integration of neuroimaging and genetic data features prominently in their research approach. Their expertise contributes to understanding mental health and neurological conditions in older adult populations.

Best Publications

  • Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)

    Paul K. Crane;Adam Carle;Laura E. Gibbons;Philip Insel

  • A composite score for executive functioning, validated in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with baseline mild cognitive impairment

    Laura E. Gibbons;Adam C. Carle;R. Scott Mackin;Danielle J Harvey

  • Problem-Solving Therapy and Supportive Therapy in Older Adults With Major Depression and Executive Dysfunction

    Patricia A. Areán;Patrick Raue;R. Scott Mackin;Dora Kanellopoulos

  • Problem Solving Therapy and Supportive Therapy in Older Adults with Major Depression and Executive Dysfunction: Effect on Disability

    George S. Alexopoulos;Patrick J. Raue;Dimitris N. Kiosses;R. Scott Mackin

  • Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease

    Philip S. Insel;Michael Weiner;Michael Weiner;R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Elizabeth Mormino

  • Evidence-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Geriatric Depression

    R. Scott Mackin;Patricia A. Areán

  • Neuroimaging abnormalities in adults with sickle cell anemia Associations with cognition

    R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Philip Insel;Diana Truran;Elliot P. Vichinsky

  • Chronic Depressive Symptomatology in Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated with Frontal Atrophy Rate which Hastens Conversion to Alzheimer Dementia

    Simona Sacuiu;Simona Sacuiu;Simona Sacuiu;Philip S Insel;Susanne Mueller;Susanne Mueller;Duygu Tosun;Duygu Tosun

  • Association of Sleep and β-Amyloid Pathology Among Older Cognitively Unimpaired Adults.

    Philip S. Insel;Philip S. Insel;Brian S. Mohlenhoff;Brian S. Mohlenhoff;Thomas C. Neylan;Thomas C. Neylan;Andrew D. Krystal

  • Assessing risk for preclinical β-amyloid pathology with APOE, cognitive, and demographic information

    Philip S. Insel;Philip S. Insel;Philip S. Insel;Sebastian Palmqvist;R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Rachel L. Nosheny

  • The transitional association between β-amyloid pathology and regional brain atrophy

    Philip S. Insel;Niklas Mattsson;Niklas Mattsson;Niklas Mattsson;Michael C. Donohue;R. Scott Mackin

  • Unsupervised online neuropsychological test performance for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Results from the Brain Health Registry.

    R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Philip S. Insel;Diana Truran;Shannon Finley

  • Late-Life Depression Is Associated With Reduced Cortical Amyloid Burden: Findings From the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Depression Project

    R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;Philip S. Insel;Philip S. Insel;Susan Landau;David Bickford

  • Cognitive functioning in individuals with severe compulsive hoarding behaviors and late life depression.

    R. Scott Mackin;Patricia A. Areán;Kevin L. Delucchi;Carol A. Mathews

  • Association of age at depression onset with cognitive functioning in individuals with late-life depression and executive dysfunction.

    R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;J. Craig Nelson;Kevin L. Delucchi;Patrick J. Raue

  • Patterns of Reduced Cortical Thickness in Late-Life Depression and Relationship to Psychotherapeutic Response

    R. Scott Mackin;Duygu Tosun;Susanne G. Mueller;Jun-Young Lee

  • Cognitive outcomes after psychotherapeutic interventions for major depression in older adults with executive dysfunction.

    R. Scott Mackin;R. Scott Mackin;J. Craig Nelson;Kevin Delucchi;Patrick Raue

  • Patterns of Alcohol and Drug Use Among Depressed Older Adults Seeking Outpatient Psychiatric Services

    Derek D. Satre;Derek D. Satre;Stacy A. Sterling;R. Scott Mackin;Constance M. Weisner;Constance M. Weisner

  • Cognitive and psychiatric predictors of medical treatment adherence among older adults in primary care clinics

    R. Scott Mackin;Patricia A. Areán

  • Accelerating rates of cognitive decline and imaging markers associated with β-amyloid pathology

    Philip S. Insel;Niklas Mattsson;R. Scott Mackin;Michael Schöll

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip S. Insel
Philip S. Insel University of California, San Francisco
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco
Niklas Mattsson
Niklas Mattsson Lund University
Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Duygu Tosun
Duygu Tosun University of California, San Francisco
Susanne G. Mueller
Susanne G. Mueller University of California, San Francisco
Derek D. Satre
Derek D. Satre University of California, San Francisco
Paul S. Aisen
Paul S. Aisen University of Southern California
Paul Maruff
Paul Maruff University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and career pathways, especially in fields like social work. Many students opt for an online degree in social work or related disciplines to gain flexibility and access top programs across the country.

For those interested in regional options, the best social work degrees in Miami offer vibrant, diverse practicum experiences. Students seeking opportunities in the heartland can explore the best social work degree programs in the Midwest, known for strong clinical training and community engagement.

If you prefer a program tailored to specific states, consider the top social work programs in Minnesota with their commitment to mental health and family services. The best social work programs in Mississippi are recognized for their focus on rural and underserved populations.

Exploring these online degrees can help match your Psychology background with meaningful careers in counseling, advocacy, research, and community service.

Best Scientists Citing R. Scott Mackin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles