World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniele Vignoli

Daniele Vignoli

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5977 5554 60 58 158 5699

Daniele Vignoli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniele Vignoli between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniele Vignoli published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 29 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 21 publications
2005 2025

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniele Vignoli: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 7
2010 5
2011 5
2012 4
2013 5
2014 19
2015 10
2016 9
2017 5
2018 17
2019 10
2020 14
2021 21
2022 14
2023 7
2024 8
2025 21
Total 194
Download as CSV

Daniele Vignoli publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Vignoli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 158
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniele Vignoli D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniele Vignoli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniele Vignoli is affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy and works primarily within the social sciences. Their research focuses extensively on demography, sociology, and related interdisciplinary fields.

Their academic contributions include a significant number of publications in areas such as family dynamics, employment and welfare, and gender studies. Key topics in their work cover:

  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges

Vignoli's research output is strongly represented in the subfields of:

  • Demography
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Genus
  • European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie
  • Demography
  • Demographic Research
  • Statistical Methods & Applications

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, with notable frequent collaborators being:

  • Raffaele Guetto
  • Giacomo Bazzani
  • Alessandra Minello
  • Giammarco Alderotti
  • Anna Matysiak

Some of their recent publications include:

  • A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework (2020, Genus)
  • Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis (2021, Demography)
  • The Great Recession and Fertility in Europe: A Sub-national Analysis (2020, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie)
  • Spreading Uncertainty, Shrinking Birth Rates: A Natural Experiment for Italy (2021, European Sociological Review)
  • Is the effect of job uncertainty on fertility intentions channeled by subjective well-being? (2020, Advances in Life Course Research)

Best Publications

  • Fertility and women’s employment: a meta-analysis

    Anna Matysiak;Daniele Vignoli

  • A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework.

    Daniele Vignoli;Raffaele Guetto;Giacomo Bazzani;Elena Pirani

  • Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters?

    Gerda Neyer;Trude Lappegård;Daniele Vignoli

  • Whose Job Instability Affects the Likelihood of Becoming a Parent in Italy? A Tale of two Partners

    Daniele Vignoli;Sven Drefahl;Gustavo De Santis

  • Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis.

    Giammarco Alderotti;Daniele Vignoli;Michela Baccini;Anna Matysiak

  • Partners’ Educational Pairings and Fertility Across Europe

    Natalie Nitsche;Anna Matysiak;Jan Van Bavel;Daniele Vignoli

  • The impact of job uncertainty on first-birth postponement

    Daniele Vignoli;Valentina Tocchioni;Alessandra Mattei

  • The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings

    Anna Matysiak;Marta Styrc;Daniele Vignoli

  • Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia

    Brienna Perelli-Harris;Monika Mynarska;Ann Berrington;Caroline Berghammer

  • A Home to Plan the First Child? Fertility Intentions and Housing Conditions in Italy

    Daniele Vignoli;Francesca Rinesi;Eleonora Mussino

  • Diverse Paths into Childlessness over the Life Course

    Monika Mynarska;Anna Matysiak;Anna Rybińska;Valentina Tocchioni

  • Fertility Intentions and Obstacles to Their Realization in France and Italy

    Arnaud Régnier-Loilier;Daniele Vignoli;Catriona Dutreuilh

  • Uncertainty and Narratives of the Future: A Theoretical Framework for Contemporary Fertility

    Daniele Vignoli;Giacomo Bazzani;Giacomo Bazzani;Raffaele Guetto;Alessandra Minello

  • Fertility intentions and outcomes: Implementing the Theory of Planned Behavior with graphical models.

    Letizia Mencarini;Letizia Mencarini;Daniele Vignoli;Anna Gottard

  • Diverse Effects of Women’s Employment on Fertility: Insights From Italy and Poland: Diverses conséquences de l’emploi des femmes sur la fécondité: quelques informations à partir des cas de l’Italie et de la Pologne

    Anna Matysiak;Daniele Vignoli

  • Rising marital disruption in Italy and its correlates

    Daniele Vignoli;Irene Ferro

  • Narratives of the future shape fertility in uncertain times. Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

    Raffaele Guetto;Giacomo Bazzani;Daniele Vignoli

  • Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions: The Causal Effect of Narratives of the Future

    Daniele Vignoli;Alessandra Minello;Giacomo Bazzani;Camilla Matera

  • Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition

    Daniele Vignoli;Silvana Salvini

  • Things change: Women’s and men’s marital disruption dynamics in Italy during a time of social transformations, 1970-2003

    Silvana Salvini;Daniele Vignoli

  • Uncertain lives: Insights into the role of job precariousness in union formation in Italy

    Daniele Vignoli;Valentina Tocchioni;Silvana Salvini

Frequent Co-Authors

Trude Lappegård
Trude Lappegård University of Oslo
Viviana Patti
Viviana Patti University of Turin
Tomáš Sobotka
Tomáš Sobotka Austrian Academy of Sciences
Bruno Arpino
Bruno Arpino University of Padua
Jan Van Bavel
Jan Van Bavel KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities studies in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths. Today, many students are turning to online degree programs for flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance work, family, and education.

If you’re interested in social work, there are accelerated msw programs online that let you earn your Master of Social Work more quickly. These programs can help you qualify for advanced positions in community organizations, healthcare, or schools.

For those passionate about psychology, a 2 year psychology degree online can be an efficient route to starting a career in mental health support or research. These accelerated options are both time-saving and cost-effective.

Students aiming to become counselors should consider cacrep accredited universities. CACREP accreditation is a gold standard, ensuring your credentials will be recognized by employers and licensing bodies.

If working with couples and families appeals to you, an accredited marriage and family therapist degree online could lead to a fulfilling career in therapy or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Daniele Vignoli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles