World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
7202
World Ranking
6188
National Ranking
443

Jane Klobas publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Klobas sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jane Klobas D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Klobas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Klobas is affiliated with Murdoch University in Australia and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Their work spans subfields including Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, and General Health Professions.

Their research topics encompass a range of subjects within business and social sciences, such as:

  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

Jane Klobas has recently published several papers in various academic journals. These include:

  • "Green core competence and firm performance in a post-conflict country, Iraq," 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment
  • "Unveiling knowledge quality, researcher satisfaction, learning, and loyalty," 2020, Information Technology and People
  • "How perceived contextual barriers for entrepreneurship reduce entrepreneurial intentions: a TPB study," 2024, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
  • "Malaysian Regulative Institutional Context Moderating Entrepreneurs' Export Intention," 2020, The Journal of Entrepreneurship
  • "Time distortion in student YouTube use: The effects of use motivation, personality, and pattern of use on study efficiency," 2023, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

The most frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Business Strategy and the Environment
  • International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
  • Information Technology and People
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • The Journal of Entrepreneurship

Jane Klobas collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, among them:

  • Hussam Al Halbusi
  • T. Ramayah
  • Tariq Ahmed
  • VGR Chandran
  • Muhammad Waheed Akhtar

Best Publications

  • A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact

    Tanya J. McGill;Jane E. Klobas

  • User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model

    Tanya McGill;Valerie Hobbs;Jane Klobas

  • Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior

    Icek Ajzen;Jane Klobas

  • Entrepreneurship education programmes: How learning, inspiration and resources affect intentions for new venture creation in a developing economy

    Tariq Ahmed;V.G.R. Chandran;Jane E. Klobas;Francisco Liñán;Francisco Liñán

  • Knowledge management in small enterprises

    David Lim;Jane E. Klobas

  • Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts

    Donata Francescato;Rita Porcelli;Minou Mebane;Marcella Cuddetta

  • Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use

    Jane E. Klobas

  • Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions

    Lars Dommermuth;Jane Klobas;Jane Klobas;Trude Lappegård

  • Critical success factors for the continuation of e-learning initiatives

    Tanya Jane McGill;Jane E. Klobas;Jane E. Klobas;Stefano Renzi

  • Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality effects

    Jane Elizabeth Klobas;Tanya Jane McGill;Sedigheh Moghavvemi;Tanousha Paramanathan

  • The role of involvement in learning management system success

    Jane E. Klobas;Jane E. Klobas;Tanya Jane McGill

  • Quantitative Methods in Tourism: A Handbook

    Rodolfo Baggio;Jane E. Klobas

  • Quantitative Methods in Tourism

    Rodolfo Baggio;Jane Klobas

  • Evaluating Collaborative Learning Processes Using System-Based Measurement.

    César A. Collazos;Luis A. Guerrero;José A. Pino;Stefano Renzi

  • Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap

    Gaby Haddow;Jane E. Klobas;Jane E. Klobas

  • Building Knowledge in Projects: A Practical Application of Social Constructivism to information Systems Development

    Paul Jackson;Jane Klobas

  • Specialized entrepreneurship education: does it really matter? Fresh evidence from Pakistan

    Tariq Ahmed;V.G.R. Chandran;Jane Klobas

  • Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories

    Paul Jackson;Jane Klobas

  • Adults Learning To Use the Internet: A Longitudinal Study of Attitudes and Other Factors Associated with Intended Internet Use

    Jane E Klobas;Laurel A Clyde

  • The role of spreadsheet knowledge in user-developed application success

    Tanya J. McGill;Jane E. Klobas

Frequent Co-Authors

Aart C. Liefbroer
Aart C. Liefbroer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Trude Lappegård
Trude Lappegård University of Oslo
Jamie Murphy
Jamie Murphy University of Eastern Finland
Icek Ajzen
Icek Ajzen University of Massachusetts Amherst
Rodolfo Baggio
Rodolfo Baggio Bocconi University
Kristin E. Anderson
Kristin E. Anderson University of Minnesota
Francisco Liñán
Francisco Liñán University of Seville
Arnstein Aassve
Arnstein Aassve Bocconi University
Joop J. Hox
Joop J. Hox Utrecht University
Malcolm MacLachlan
Malcolm MacLachlan National University of Ireland, Maynooth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in the social sciences and humanities is now more accessible than ever, thanks to a wide variety of online degree programs. Students interested in clinical psychology can consider accredited online psyd programs, which prepare graduates for high-level roles in counseling and mental health services.

For those aiming to focus on family and relationship therapy, online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) offer flexible, accredited pathways to become licensed therapists with a focus on holistic well-being.

Affordability remains a key concern for many prospective students. If you are wondering how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology, there are now many cost-effective online options that can help reduce student debt while achieving your career goals.

Additionally, educators and professionals in leadership may be interested in 1 year edd programs online. These fast-track options allow advancement in academia or administration in a shorter time frame.

With the rise of flexible, online learning, it’s easier than ever to build a meaningful career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Klobas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles