World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael D. Williams

Michael D. Williams

Award Badge
Business and Management
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 55 722 665 107 93 226 18280

Michael D. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael D. Williams between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael D. Williams published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2015. 4 of the 522 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2015. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 17 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1964 2025

522 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael D. Williams: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 4
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 1
1984 4
1985 3
1986 6
1987 4
1988 8
1989 5
1990 4
1991 11
1992 1
1993 17
1994 5
1995 2
1996 5
1997 10
1998 6
1999 9
2000 9
2001 8
2002 11
2003 9
2004 16
2005 6
2006 16
2007 22
2008 19
2009 31
2010 13
2011 26
2012 22
2013 34
2014 27
2015 40
2016 15
2017 22
2018 11
2019 10
2020 9
2021 14
2022 4
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 522
Download as CSV

Michael D. Williams publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–229 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 226 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34 226
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael D. Williams D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35 55
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Michael D. Williams is affiliated with Swansea University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a significant focus on Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Hepatology.

The main topics addressed in Williams' work include:

  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Diabetes and associated disorders

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of interests across health care, manufacturing, and industry collaboration. Selected papers include:

  • "Perspectives on the future of manufacturing within the Industry 4.0 era," 2020, Production Planning & Control
  • "Associations of Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health With Colorectal Cancer Screening," 2022, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
  • "Deconstructing the ivory tower: identifying challenges of university-industry ecosystem partnerships," 2021, Review of Managerial Science
  • "Collaborating to deliver value in health care: exploring conditions required for successful healthcare and life science sector collaboration," 2020, Transforming Government People Process and Policy
  • "Enhancing Medical Students' Interprofessional Teamwork Through Simulated Room of Errors Experience," 2020, Journal of Surgical Research

Williams frequently publishes in venues such as the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Production Planning & Control, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Journal of Surgical Research, and British Journal of Surgery.

Collaborations form an important part of Williams' research network. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Remon Korenblik
  • Jan Heil
  • Marc H.A. Bemelmans
  • Christoph A. Binkert
  • Stefan Breitenstein

Best Publications

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) : Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy

    Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Laurie Hughes;Elvira Ismagilova;Gert Aarts

  • Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model

    Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Nripendra P. Rana;Anand Jeyaraj;Marc Clement

  • The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review

    Michael D. Williams;Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi

  • Modeling Consumers’ Adoption Intentions of Remote Mobile Payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with Innovativeness, Risk, and Trust

    Emma L. Slade;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Niall C. Piercy;Michael D. Williams

  • Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy

    Ali Abdallah Alalwan;Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Nripendra P. Rana;Michael D. Williams

  • An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)

    Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Nripendra P. Rana;Marijn Janssen;Banita Lal

  • Contemporary Trends and Issues in it Adoption and Diffusion Research

    Michael D. Williams;Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Banita Lal;Andrew Schwarz

  • Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments

    Emma Slade;Michael D Williams;Yogesh Dwivedi;Niall Piercy

  • Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view

    Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Banita Lal;Michael D. Williams

  • A Meta-analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

    Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Nripendra P. Rana;Hsin Chen;Michael D. Williams

  • Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: Examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust

    Ali A Alalwan;Yogesh K Dwivedi;Nripendra P Rana;Banita Lal

  • Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model

    Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Michael D. Williams;Vishanth Weerakkody

  • Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India

    Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Michael D. Williams;Vishanth Weerakkody

  • Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? A systematic review of citations of UTAUT's originating article

    Michael D. Williams;Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Banita Lal

  • A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government

    Nripendra P. Rana;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Michael D. Williams

  • Rogers’ Innovation Adoption Attributes: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Existing Research

    Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor;Yogesh K. Dwivedi;Michael D. Williams

  • Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use

    Rebecca A. Hill;Paul Beynon-Davies;Michael D. Williams

  • Exploring consumers perceived risk and trust for mobile shopping: A theoretical framework and empirical study

    Hannah R. Marriott;Michael D. Williams

  • Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model

    Zahir Irani;Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi;Michael D. Williams

  • Mobile payment adoption: Classification and review of the extant literature

    Emma L. Slade;Michael D. Williams;Yogesh K. Dwivedi

Frequent Co-Authors

Yogesh K. Dwivedi
Yogesh K. Dwivedi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Nripendra P. Rana
Nripendra P. Rana Queen's University Belfast
Paul Beynon-Davies
Paul Beynon-Davies Cardiff University
Nitish Singh
Nitish Singh Saint Louis University
Mahmud Akhter Shareef
Mahmud Akhter Shareef North South University
Vishanth Weerakkody
Vishanth Weerakkody University of Bradford
Ali Abdallah Alalwan
Ali Abdallah Alalwan Qatar University
Zahir Irani
Zahir Irani University of Bradford
Marijn Janssen
Marijn Janssen Delft University of Technology
John S. Edwards
John S. Edwards Aston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees broadens your career options in Business and Management. For those interested in the healthcare sector, healthcare administration degrees offer foundational knowledge in managing medical organizations. These programs are valued for their flexibility and potential for career growth.

Professionals aiming for leadership can consider a master healthcare administration program. An advanced degree can enhance your qualifications and open doors to executive roles.

Cost is often a key consideration, especially when studying online. If you are exploring finance or business, it’s important to compare the online accounting degree cost at different institutions to ensure affordability and value.

For those interested in technology-driven careers, the best online ai degree programs combine business expertise with the latest in artificial intelligence, equipping graduates for cutting-edge roles.

Whichever pathway you choose, researching your options ensures you find flexible, affordable, and career-focused programs.

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles