World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
20189
World Ranking
19637
National Ranking
1024

Jan C. Simon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Simon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 420 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jan C. Simon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan C. Simon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan Activate Dendritic Cells via Toll-like Receptor 4

    Christian C. Termeer;Frauke Benedix;Jonathon Sleeman;Christina Fieber

  • Immune responses to implants – A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials

    Sandra Franz;Stefan Rammelt;Dieter Scharnweber;Jan C. Simon

  • Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

    Ulrike Leiter;Rudolf Stadler;Cornelia Mauch;Werner Hohenberger

  • Hyaluronan fragments stimulate endothelial recognition of injury through TLR4.

    Kristen R. Taylor;Janet M. Trowbridge;Jennifer A. Rudisill;Christian C. Termeer

  • Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic urticaria who exhibit IgE against thyroperoxidase.

    Marcus Maurer;Sabine Altrichter;Thomas Bieber;Tilo Biedermann

  • Patient perspectives on the management of atopic dermatitis

    Torsten Zuberbier;Seth J. Orlow;Amy S. Paller;Alain Taïeb

  • The LIFE-Adult-Study: objectives and design of a population-based cohort study with 10,000 deeply phenotyped adults in Germany

    Markus Loeffler;Christoph Engel;Peter Ahnert;Dorothee Alfermann

  • Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogels capture inflammatory chemokines and rescue defective wound healing in mice

    Nadine Lohmann;Lucas Schirmer;Passant Atallah;Elke Wandel

  • Final Analysis of DeCOG-SLT Trial: No Survival Benefit for Complete Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma With Positive Sentinel Node

    Ulrike Leiter;Rudolf Stadler;Cornelia Mauch;Werner Hohenberger

  • Regenerative potential of glycosaminoglycans for skin and bone.

    Juliane Salbach;Tilman D. Rachner;Martina Rauner;Ute Hempel

  • Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

    Lisa Zimmer;Elisabeth Livingstone;Jessica C Hassel;Michael Fluck

  • Phase II DeCOG-study of ipilimumab in pretreated and treatment-naive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

    Lisa Zimmer;Julia Vaubel;Peter Mohr;Axel Hauschild

  • Hyaluronan-oligosaccharide-induced transcription of metalloproteases

    Christina Fieber;Petra Baumann;Rüdiger Vallon;Christian Termeer

  • Differential regulation of hyaluronan metabolism in the epidermal and dermal compartments of human skin by UVB irradiation.

    Marco Averbeck;Carl A. Gebhardt;Susanne Voigt;Simone Beilharz

  • Hyaluronan fragments induce cytokine and metalloprotease upregulation in human melanoma cells in part by signalling via TLR4

    Verena Voelcker;Carl Gebhardt;Marco Averbeck;Anja Saalbach

  • High-Fat Diet Exacerbates Early Psoriatic Skin Inflammation Independent of Obesity: Saturated Fatty Acids as Key Players.

    Diana Herbert;Sandra Franz;Yulia Popkova;Ulf Anderegg

  • Hyaluronan - magic glue for the regulation of the immune response?

    Christian Termeer;Jonathan P Sleeman;Jan C Simon

  • Topical application of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) and of its metabolite hyperforin inhibits the allostimulatory capacity of epidermal cells.

    C M Schempp;B Winghofer;R Lüdtke;B Simon-Haarhaus

  • Regenerative medicine in dermatology: biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, gene transfer and beyond

    Christina Dieckmann;Regina Renner;Linda Milkova;Linda Milkova;Jan C. Simon;Jan C. Simon

  • Interaction of human Thy-1 (CD 90) with the integrin alphavbeta3 (CD51/CD61): an important mechanism mediating melanoma cell adhesion to activated endothelium.

    Anja Saalbach;Anne Wetzel;Uwe-Frithjof Haustein;Michael Sticherling

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Jonathan P. Sleeman
Jonathan P. Sleeman University Medical Centre Mannheim
Irina Lehmann
Irina Lehmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Dirk Schadendorf
Dirk Schadendorf University of Duisburg-Essen
Michael Borte
Michael Borte Leipzig University
Thomas Schwarz
Thomas Schwarz Boston Children's Hospital
Annette G. Beck-Sickinger
Annette G. Beck-Sickinger Leipzig University
Thomas M. Magin
Thomas M. Magin Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Medicine in the USA, there are several related careers accessible through online degrees. These flexible programs can be a smart route to enter the healthcare sector, offering both affordability and accredited credentials.

Many students consider becoming a pharmacist and may look for a pharmacy school online accredited for flexible study options. For those interested in the management of patient information, pursuing a him associate degree online can open doors to roles in healthcare data administration.

Other popular pathways include medical billing and coding, which allow professionals to work with healthcare records from virtually anywhere. Getting a medical coding certification online is a quick entry point into this in-demand field. Aspiring advanced practice nurses can find the cheapest nurse practitioner programs online, providing a flexible and affordable way to advance their medical careers.

These alternative degree and certification options make it easier than ever to pursue a rewarding healthcare career tailored to your interests and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Jan C. Simon

Trending Scientists