World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
11156
World Ranking
4973
National Ranking
1706

Matthew C. Fitzpatrick publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Matthew C. Fitzpatrick D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew C. Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew C. Fitzpatrick is affiliated with the University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences in the United States. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable focus on subfields such as Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses several main topics including:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest ecology and management

Fitzpatrick's recent papers reflect research contributions across climate adaptation, biodiversity, and genomic methods. Select publications include:

  • "Genomic Prediction of (Mal)Adaptation Across Current and Future Climatic Landscapes" (2020) published in Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • "Maladaptation, migration and extirpation fuel climate change risk in a forest tree species" (2021) published in Nature Climate Change
  • "A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment" (2022) published in Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • "Experimental support for genomic prediction of climate maladaptation using the machine learning approach Gradient Forests" (2021) published in Molecular Ecology Resources
  • "Seeing the forest for the trees: Assessing genetic offset predictions from gradient forest" (2022) published in Evolutionary Applications

Frequent co-authors have included:

  • Stephen R. Keller
  • Thibaut Capblancq
  • Susanne Lachmuth
  • Michelle Zavala-Paez
  • Jason A. Holliday

Publishing venues where Fitzpatrick has appeared regularly include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • New Phytologist
  • Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
  • Evolutionary Applications
  • Nature Climate Change

Best Publications

  • Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data

    Olivier Broennimann;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Peter B. Pearman;Blaise Petitpierre

  • Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions

    Jessica L. Blois;Phoebe L. Zarnetske;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Seth Finnegan

  • Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity

    Jessica L. Blois;John W. Williams;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Stephen T. Jackson

  • Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation.

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Stephen R. Keller

  • The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;William W. Hargrove

  • Climate refugia: joint inference from fossil records, species distribution models and phylogeography

    Daniel G. Gavin;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Paul F. Gugger;Katy D. Heath

  • The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range?

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Jake F. Weltzin;Nathan J. Sanders;Robert R. Dunn

  • Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains

    Nathan J. Sanders;Jean-Philippe Lessard;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Robert R. Dunn

  • Climatic drivers of hemispheric asymmetry in global patterns of ant species richness

    Robert R. Dunn;Donat Agosti;Alan N. Andersen;Xavier Arnan;Xavier Arnan

  • Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: the Banksia (Proteaceae) of Western Australia

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Aaron D. Gove;Nathan J. Sanders;Robert R. Dunn

  • Genomic Prediction of (Mal)Adaptation Across Current and Future Climatic Landscapes

    Thibaut Capblancq;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Rachael A. Bay;Moises Exposito-Alonso;Moises Exposito-Alonso

  • Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations.

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Evan L. Preisser;Aaron M. Ellison;Joseph S. Elkinton

  • Environmental and historical imprints on beta diversity: insights from variation in rates of species turnover along gradients

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Nathan J. Sanders;Signe Normand;Jens-Christian Svenning

  • MaxEnt versus MaxLike: empirical comparisons with ant species distributions

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Nicholas J. Gotelli;Aaron M. Ellison

  • A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment

    Unknown

  • GlobalAnts: a new database on the geography of ant traits (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

    Catherine L. Parr;Catherine L. Parr;Robert R. Dunn;Nathan J. Sanders;Michael D. Weiser

  • Modeling Species and Community Responses to Past, Present, and Future Episodes of Climatic and Ecological Change

    Kaitlin C. Maguire;Diego Nieto-Lugilde;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;John W. Williams

  • Maladaptation, migration and extirpation fuel climate change risk in a forest tree species

    Andrew V. Gougherty;Andrew V. Gougherty;Stephen R. Keller;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick

  • Experimental support for genomic prediction of climate maladaptation using the machine learning approach Gradient Forests.

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Vikram E. Chhatre;Vikram E. Chhatre;Raju Y. Soolanayakanahally;Stephen R. Keller

  • Soil properties and tree species drive ß-diversity of soil bacterial communities

    William J. Landesman;William J. Landesman;David M. Nelson;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick

  • Global diversity in light of climate change: the case of ants

    Clinton Neil Jenkins;Nathan J. Sanders;Nathan J. Sanders;Alan N. Andersen;Xavier Arnan

  • Forecasting the future of biodiversity: a test of single- and multi-species models for ants in North America

    Matthew C. Fitzpatrick;Nathan J. Sanders;Nathan J. Sanders;Simon Ferrier;John T. Longino

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert R. Dunn
Robert R. Dunn North Carolina State University
Nathan J. Sanders
Nathan J. Sanders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aaron M. Ellison
Aaron M. Ellison Harvard University
John W. Williams
John W. Williams University of Wisconsin–Madison
Catherine L. Parr
Catherine L. Parr University of Liverpool
Evan L. Preisser
Evan L. Preisser University of Rhode Island
Jonathan Majer
Jonathan Majer Curtin University
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Stacy M. Philpott
Stacy M. Philpott University of California, Santa Cruz
Alan N. Andersen
Alan N. Andersen Charles Darwin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Ecology and Evolution often have a wide range of career options available—many of which can be pursued through flexible online programs. For those looking to blend education and science, exploring what is an slp in education provides insight into how speech-language pathologists support students and interdisciplinary research in academic settings.

Alternatively, creative and technical thinkers might choose to study the environment's intersection with the built world by enrolling in an online architecture school. Strong analytical skills developed through a bachelor in mathematics online are invaluable for ecological modeling and evolutionary data analysis.

Visual communicators and advocates for environmental awareness can refine their talents through graphic design schools online, helping bring complex scientific concepts to life for the public. These related online degrees demonstrate the diverse career pathways available for those passionate about Ecology, Evolution, and their broader impact on society.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew C. Fitzpatrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles