World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
9916
World Ranking
5201
National Ranking
1913

Hans C. Graber publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Graber sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 238 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hans C. Graber D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Graber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans C. Graber is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Within these broader disciplines, their work covers subfields including Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their scientific contributions focus on several key topics, notably Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Climate Change and Permafrost.

Hans C. Graber's publication record includes several recent papers published in well-regarded scientific venues. These include:

  • A warm jet in a cold ocean (2021) - Nature Communications
  • The Inner-Shelf Dynamics Experiment (2020) - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Marine X-Band Radar Currents and Bathymetry: An Argument for a Wave Number-Dependent Retrieval Method (2020) - Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Improving Situational Awareness in the Arctic Ocean (2020) - Frontiers in Marine Science
  • CLASI: Coordinating Innovative Observations and Modeling to Improve Coastal Environmental Prediction Systems (2021) - Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals with multiple contributions to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Remote Sensing of Environment, Nature Communications, Frontiers in Marine Science, and the Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans.

Hans C. Graber has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Björn Lund, Julie Paprocki, Nina Stark, Roland Romeiser, and Jamie MacMahan, with collaboration counts ranging from four to five joint publications.

Best Publications

  • On the limiting aerodynamic roughness of the ocean in very strong winds

    M. A. Donelan;B. K. Haus;N. Reul;W. J. Plant

  • The formation and fate of internal waves in the South China Sea

    Matthew H. Alford;Matthew H. Alford;Thomas Peacock;Jennifer A. MacKinnon;Jonathan D. Nash

  • Evaluation of Wind Vectors Observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds Using Ocean Buoy Data

    Naoto Ebuchi;Hans C. Graber;Michael J. Caruso

  • On the wave age dependence of wind stress over pure wind seas

    William M. Drennan;Hans C. Graber;Danièle Hauser;Céline Gwenaëlle Quentin

  • SPECTRAL WAVE ATTENUATION BY BOTTOM FRICTION: THEORY

    Unknown

  • On the accuracy of HF radar surface current measurements: Intercomparisons with ship‐based sensors

    R. D. Chapman;L. K. Shay;H. C. Graber;J. B. Edson

  • Effect of wave‐current interaction on wind‐driven circulation in narrow, shallow embayments

    Richard P. Signell;Robert C. Beardsley;H. C. Graber;A. Capotondi

  • Introduction to High-Frequency Radar: Reality and Myth

    Jeffrey D. Paduan;Hans C. Graber

  • Shallow Water '06: A Joint Acoustic Propagation/Nonlinear Internal Wave Physics Experiment

    Dajun Tang;James N. Moum;James F. Lynch;Philip A. Abbot

  • Impact of typhoons on the ocean in the pacific

    E.A. D'Asaro;P. G. Black;L. R. Centurioni;Y.-T. Chang

  • HF radar comparisons with moored estimates of current speed and direction: expected differences and implications

    H.C. Graber;B.K. Haus;R.D. Chapman;L.K. Shay

  • ASIS—A New Air–Sea Interaction Spar Buoy: Design and Performance at Sea

    Hans C. Graber;Eugene A. Terray;Mark A. Donelan;William M. Drennan

  • Swell and Slanting-Fetch Effects on Wind Wave Growth

    Fabrice Ardhuin;T. H. C. Herbers;Gerbrant Ph. Van Vledder;Kristen P. Watts

  • Ocean surface features and currents measured with synthetic aperture radar interferometry and HF radar

    Hans C. Graber;Donald R. Thompson;Richard E. Carande;Richard E. Carande

  • Overview of the Arctic Sea State and Boundary Layer Physics Program

    Jim Thomson;Stephen Ackley;Fanny Girard-Ardhuin;Fabrice Ardhuin

  • Eddy-correlation measurements of air-sea fluxes from a discus buoy

    François Anctil;Mark A. Donelan;William M. Drennan;Hans C. Graber

  • Ocean Wave Slope Observations Using Radar Backscatter and Laser Altimeters

    Douglas Vandemark;B. Chapron;J. Sun;G. H. Crescenti

  • VALIDATION OF HF RADAR MEASUREMENTS

    Rick D. Chapman;Hans C. Graber

  • Wind Retrieval From Shipborne Nautical X-Band Radar Data

    B. Lund;H. C. Graber;R. Romeiser

  • Mesoscale Ocean Surface Current Structure Detected by High-Frequency Radar

    Lynn K. Shay;Hans C. Graber;Duncan B. Ross;Rickey D. Chapman

  • Evidence for the Effects of Swell and Unsteady Winds on Marine Wind Stress

    William M. Drennan;Hans C. Graber;Mark A. Donelan

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Drennan
William M. Drennan University of Miami
Brian K. Haus
Brian K. Haus University of Miami
Lynn K. Shay
Lynn K. Shay University of Miami
Mark A. Donelan
Mark A. Donelan University of Miami
Jim Thomson
Jim Thomson University of Washington
Peter Wadhams
Peter Wadhams University of Cambridge
Luc Rainville
Luc Rainville University of Washington
Luca Centurioni
Luca Centurioni University of California, San Diego
Harper L. Simmons
Harper L. Simmons University of Alaska Fairbanks
William Perrie
William Perrie Bedford Institute of Oceanography

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Environmental Sciences often goes hand in hand with understanding broader social and educational contexts. For students interested in the human and societal aspects of environmental issues, pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree can provide critical insights into community dynamics and social behavior relevant to environmental policy and advocacy.

For professionals aiming to advance in education leadership within environmental and sustainability programs, choosing the online edd no dissertation route offers flexibility without the traditional dissertation hurdle. This path is ideal for those focused on practical leadership skills over extensive research.

If looking to transition smoothly into advanced educational roles, the best online eds to edd programs provide streamlined options that bridge master's and doctoral study for educators passionate about environmental curriculum development.

Social workers specializing in environmental justice and community wellbeing can benefit from enrolling in dsw online programs. These offer affordable pathways to doctoral credentials while addressing critical social factors linked to environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Hans C. Graber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles