World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmanuel Arthur

Emmanuel Arthur

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
3740
World Ranking
9485
National Ranking
134

Emmanuel Arthur publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Arthur sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Emmanuel Arthur D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel Arthur sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuel Arthur is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has a substantial body of research in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science, and Engineering. Their work prominently intersects with Soil Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Biomaterials, and Global and Planetary Change.

The research contributions focus extensively on several core topics including:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Emmanuel Arthur has published multiple papers in a variety of journals. Representative recent papers include:

  • "Effect of long-term organic amendments on the full-range soil water retention characteristics of a Vertisol," 2020, Soil and Tillage Research
  • "Biochar amendment impacts on microbial community structures and biological and enzyme activities in a weathered tropical sandy loam," 2021, Applied Soil Ecology
  • "Evaluating models to estimate cation exchange capacity of calcareous soils," 2021, Geoderma
  • "Soil organic carbon storage and quality are impacted by corn cob biochar application on a tropical sandy loam," 2020, Journal of Soils and Sediments
  • "Improvements in soil physical properties after long-term manure addition depend on soil and crop type," 2022, Geoderma

The researcher frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Lis Wollesen de Jonge, Per Møldrup, Markus Tuller, Eric Oppong Danso, and Mogens Humlekrog Greve. These collaborations indicate a network of interdisciplinary engagement.

Emmanuel Arthur's publication record features recurring venues such as:

  • Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Geoderma
  • Soil and Tillage Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • European Journal of Soil Science

Best Publications

  • Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Fatemeh Razzaghi;Peter Bilson Obour;Peter Bilson Obour;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Soil water retention, air flow and pore structure characteristics after corn cob biochar application to a tropical sandy loam

    E. Amoakwah;E. Amoakwah;K.A. Frimpong;D. Okae-Anti;E. Arthur

  • Effect of biochar on aerobic processes, enzyme activity, and crop yields in two sandy loam soils

    Zhencai Sun;Esben Wilson Bruun;Emmanuel Arthur;Lis Wollesen de Jonge

  • Spatial variability of microbial richness and diversity and relationships with soil organic carbon, texture and structure across an agricultural field

    Muhammad Naveed;Lasantha Herath;Per Møldrup;Emmanuel Arthur

  • A New Two-Stage Approach to predicting the soil water characteristic from saturation to oven-dryness

    Dan Karup Jensen;Markus Tuller;Lis Wollesen de Jonge;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Revealing Soil Structure and Functional Macroporosity along a Clay Gradient Using X-ray Computed Tomography

    Muhammad Naveed;Per Moldrup;Emmanuel Arthur;Dorthe Wildenschild

  • Towards prediction of soil erodibility, SOM and CaCO3 using laboratory Vis-NIR spectra: A case study in a semi-arid region of Iran

    Yaser Ostovari;Shoja Ghorbani-Dashtaki;Hossein-Ali Bahrami;Mozhgan Abbasi

  • Density and permeability of a loess soil: Long-term organic matter effect and the response to compressive stress

    E. Arthur;P. Schjønning;P. Moldrup;M. Tuller

  • Amending a loamy sand with three compost types: impact on soil quality

    Emmanuel Arthur;Wim Cornelis;Jan Vermang;E De Rocker

  • Effect of long-term organic amendments on the full-range soil water retention characteristics of a Vertisol

    Hu Zhou;Hu Zhou;Chong Chen;Daozhong Wang;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Soil Specific Surface Area and Non-Singularity of Soil-Water Retention at Low Saturations

    Emmanuel Arthur;Markus Tuller;Per Moldrup;Augustus C. Resurreccion

  • Direct and Indirect Short-Term Effects of Biochar on Physical Characteristics of an Arable Sandy Loam

    Zhencai Sun;Per Moldrup;Lars Elsgaard;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Evaluation of theoretical and empirical water vapor sorption isotherm models for soils

    Emmanuel Arthur;Markus Tuller;Per Møldrup;Lis Wollesen de Jonge

  • Effect of Biochar Application on Hydraulic Properties of Sandy Soil under Dry and Wet Conditions

    Chong Chen;Ruiqi Wang;Jianying Shang;Kesi Liu

  • Effects of biochar and manure amendments on water vapor sorption in a sandy loam soil

    Emmanuel Arthur;Markus Tuller;Per Møldrup;L. W. De Jonge

  • Soil resistance and resilience to mechanical stresses for three differently managed sandy loam soils

    E. Arthur;P. Schjønning;P. Moldrup;L.W. de Jonge

  • Prediction of the soil water retention curve for structured soil from saturation to oven-dryness

    D. Karup;P. Moldrup;M. Tuller;E. Arthur

  • Applicability of the Guggenheim–Anderson–Boer water vapour sorption model for estimation of soil specific surface area

    E. Arthur;E. Arthur;M. Tuller;P. Moldrup;M. H. Greve

  • Evaluating models to estimate cation exchange capacity of calcareous soils

    Fatemeh Razzaghi;Emmanuel Arthur;Ali Akbar Moosavi

  • Prediction of clay content from water vapour sorption isotherms considering hysteresis and soil organic matter content

    E. Arthur;M. Tuller;Per Møldrup;Dan Karup Jensen

  • Compost Amendment to Sandy Soil Affects Soil Properties and Greenhouse Tomato Productivity

    Emmanuel Arthur;Wim Cornelis;Fatemeh Razzaghi

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Moldrup
Per Moldrup Aalborg University
Lis Wollesen de Jonge
Lis Wollesen de Jonge Aarhus University
Markus Tuller
Markus Tuller University of Arizona
Mogens Humlekrog Greve
Mogens Humlekrog Greve Aarhus University
Mathias Neumann Andersen
Mathias Neumann Andersen Aarhus University
Per Schjønning
Per Schjønning Aarhus University
Tusheng Ren
Tusheng Ren China Agricultural University
Martin Holmstrup
Martin Holmstrup Aarhus University
Wim Cornelis
Wim Cornelis Ghent University
Mogens Nicolaisen
Mogens Nicolaisen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students consider advanced education paths that integrate interdisciplinary knowledge and leadership skills. Programs like education doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexibility for professionals aiming to advance without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Additionally, transitions from master's to doctoral studies are streamlined through eds to edd programs online, preparing graduates for leadership roles in educational and environmental sectors. For those interested in social services linked to environmental health, dsw programs provide affordable pathways to develop expertise in social work at an advanced level.

Starting with foundational studies, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be an accessible stepping stone. This degree offers a broad base for students undecided on specialization or seeking a cost-effective start to their higher education journey.

These various online degree options complement environmental science education by equipping students with diverse skills for dynamic career pathways in sustainability, policy, education, and community health.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuel Arthur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles