World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lis Wollesen de Jonge

Lis Wollesen de Jonge

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
6789
World Ranking
5900
National Ranking
79

Lis Wollesen de Jonge publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lis Wollesen de Jonge sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 184 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lis Wollesen de Jonge D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lis Wollesen de Jonge sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)

Overview

Lis Wollesen de Jonge is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, contributing extensively to these fields through both studies and publications.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Soil Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change

Main topics covered in their work include:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

Lis Wollesen de Jonge has a consistent publication record with frequent contributions to several journals. Most notably, they have published extensively in:

  • Geoderma (11 publications)
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal (9 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (7 publications)
  • Journal of Environmental Management (2 publications)
  • Journal of Hydrology (2 publications)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Lis Wollesen de Jonge are:

  • "X-ray micro-computed tomography characterized soil pore network as influenced by long-term application of manure and fertilizer," 2020, Geoderma
  • "Improvements in soil physical properties after long-term manure addition depend on soil and crop type," 2022, Geoderma
  • "Combining Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Visible Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (Vis-NIRS) for Soil Phosphorus Determination," 2020, Sensors
  • "Contribution of organic carbon to the total specific surface area of soils with varying clay mineralogy," 2022, Geoderma
  • "Linking litter decomposition to soil physicochemical properties, gas transport, and land use," 2021, Soil Science Society of America Journal

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers such as:

  • Per Møldrup
  • Mogens Humlekrog Greve
  • Emmanuel Arthur
  • Cecilie Hermansen
  • Peter Lystbæk Weber

Lis Wollesen de Jonge received recognition as a Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Soil water repellency: effects of water content, temperature, and particle size

    L. W. de Jonge;O. H. Jacobsen;P. Moldrup

  • Persistent effects of subsoil compaction on pore size distribution and gas transport in a loamy soil

    F.E. Berisso;P. Schjønning;T. Keller;M. Lamandé

  • Influence of pH and solution composition on the sorption of glyphosate and prochloraz to a sandy loam soil

    Hubert de Jonge;Lis Wollesen de Jonge

  • Linking air and water transport in intact soils to macropore characteristics inferred from X-ray computed tomography

    S. Katuwal;Trine Nørgaard;Per Møldrup;Mathieu André Maurice Lamande

  • Impact of Long-Term Fertilization Practice on Soil Structure Evolution

    Muhammad Naveed;Per Møldrup;Hans-Jörg Vogel;Mathieu André Maurice Lamande

  • Soil-Water Content Dependency of Water Repellency in Soils

    Lis Wollesen de Jonge;Per Moldrup;Ole Hørbye Jacobsen

  • Effects of Manure Application and Plowing on Transport of Colloids and Phosphorus to Tile Drains

    Kirsten Schelde;Lis W. de Jonge;Charlotte Kjaergaard;Mette Laegdsmand

  • [14C]Glyphosate transport in undisturbed topsoil columns.

    Hubert de Jonge;Lis W de Jonge;Ole H Jacobsen

  • Relationship between specific surface area and the dry end of the water retention curve for soils with varying clay and organic carbon contents

    Augustus C. Resurreccion;Per Moldrup;Markus Tuller;T. P. A. Ferré

  • Particle-Facilitated Transport of Prochloraz in Undisturbed Sandy Loam Soil Columns

    H. de Jonge;O. H. Jacobsen;L. W. de Jonge;P. Moldrup

  • Water-Dispersible Colloids: Effects of Measurement Method, Clay Content, Initial Soil Matric Potential, and Wetting Rate

    Charlotte Kjaergaard;Lis W. de Jonge;Per Moldrup;Per Schjønning

  • Effect of biochar on aerobic processes, enzyme activity, and crop yields in two sandy loam soils

    Zhencai Sun;Esben Wilson Bruun;Emmanuel Arthur;Lis Wollesen de Jonge

  • Spatial variability of microbial richness and diversity and relationships with soil organic carbon, texture and structure across an agricultural field

    Muhammad Naveed;Lasantha Herath;Per Møldrup;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Diffusion-Limited Mobilization and Transport of Natural Colloids in Macroporous Soil

    Kirsten Schelde;Per Moldrup;Ole Hørbye Jacobsen;Hubert de Jonge

  • Soil Infrastructure, Interfaces & Translocation Processes in Inner Space ("Soil-it-is"): towards a road map for the constraints and crossroads of soil architecture and biophysical processes

    L. W. de Jonge;P. Moldrup;P. Schjønning

  • A New Two-Stage Approach to predicting the soil water characteristic from saturation to oven-dryness

    Dan Karup Jensen;Markus Tuller;Lis Wollesen de Jonge;Emmanuel Arthur

  • Transport modes and pathways of the strongly sorbing pesticides glyphosate and pendimethalin through structured drained soils

    Jeanne Kjær;Vibeke Ernstsen;Ole H. Jacobsen;Nis Hansen

  • Water‐Dispersible Colloids: Effects of Measurement Method, Clay Content, Initial Soil Matric Potential, and Wetting Rate

    Unknown

  • Revealing Soil Structure and Functional Macroporosity along a Clay Gradient Using X-ray Computed Tomography

    Muhammad Naveed;Per Moldrup;Emmanuel Arthur;Dorthe Wildenschild

  • Colloid Mobilization and Transport in Undisturbed Soil Columns. II. The Role of Colloid Dispersibility and Preferential Flow

    Charlotte Kjaergaard;Per Moldrup;Lis W. de Jonge;Ole H. Jacobsen

  • Predictivity Strength of the Spatial Variability of Phenanthrene Sorption Across Two Sandy Loam Fields

    Antonio Soares;Antonio Soares;Marcos Paradelo;Marcos Paradelo;Per Moldrup;Cristina Delerue-Matos

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Moldrup
Per Moldrup Aalborg University
Emmanuel Arthur
Emmanuel Arthur Aarhus University
Mogens Humlekrog Greve
Mogens Humlekrog Greve Aarhus University
Markus Tuller
Markus Tuller University of Arizona
Per Schjønning
Per Schjønning Aarhus University
Lars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard Aarhus University
Martin Holmstrup
Martin Holmstrup Aarhus University
Ty P. A. Ferré
Ty P. A. Ferré University of Arizona
Hans-Jörg Vogel
Hans-Jörg Vogel Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Dorthe Wildenschild
Dorthe Wildenschild Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads students to consider specialized fields that complement their interests and career goals. For those intrigued by Earth’s physical processes, pursuing a best online geology degree can provide essential knowledge about rocks, minerals, and natural resources.

Geospatial technology is another rapidly growing area, making an best gis undergraduate programs ideal for students wanting to specialize in mapping and spatial data analysis—key skills in environmental planning and conservation.

Environmental challenges often intersect with public policy, making an online Master of Public Administration a smart option. The top online mpa programs equip graduates to lead sustainability initiatives within governmental and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding social behavior and cultural influences is vital in environmental work. Pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology can enhance insights into community engagement and environmental justice.

Choosing from these related degrees can open diverse career pathways, from scientific research and data analysis to policy making and social advocacy—all critical to addressing today’s environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Lis Wollesen de Jonge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles