World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mogens Humlekrog Greve

Mogens Humlekrog Greve

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
5617
World Ranking
7820
National Ranking
109

Mogens Humlekrog Greve publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mogens Humlekrog Greve sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mogens Humlekrog Greve D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mogens Humlekrog Greve sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mogens Humlekrog Greve is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has a research focus within Environmental Science, contributing to over a hundred publications in this field. Their work spans several subfields including Environmental Engineering, Ecology, Soil Science, Atmospheric Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's research frequently addresses topics related to soil geostatistics and mapping, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, as well as peatlands and wetlands ecology. Additional topics of study include soil and water nutrient dynamics, fire effects on ecosystems, soil and unsaturated flow, and climate change and permafrost.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale (2023) in Biogeochemistry
  • Oblique geographic coordinates as covariates for digital soil mapping (2020) in SOIL
  • Water-table-driven greenhouse gas emission estimates guide peatland restoration at national scale (2023) in Biogeosciences
  • Interpretation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Acid Sulfate Soil Classification (2022) in Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Can We Use Machine Learning for Agricultural Land Suitability Assessment? (2021) in Agronomy

Greve collaborates extensively with several co-authors, including Lis Wollesen de Jonge, Amélie Beucher, Triven Koganti, Peter Lystbæk Weber, and Cecilie Hermansen, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Their work is published prominently in journals such as Geoderma, Soil Science Society of America Journal, SSRN Electronic Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and the European Journal of Soil Science.

Best Publications

  • Digital mapping of soil organic carbon contents and stocks in Denmark.

    Kabindra Adhikari;Alfred E. Hartemink;Budiman Minasny;Rania Bou Kheir

  • High-Resolution 3-D Mapping of Soil Texture in Denmark

    Kabindra Adhikari;Rania Bou Kheir;Mette B. Greve;Peder K. Bøcher

  • Mapping soil organic matter contents at field level with Cubist, Random Forest and kriging

    Nastaran Pouladi;Anders Bjørn Møller;Salman Tabatabai;Mogens Humlekrog Greve

  • Constructing a soil class map of Denmark based on the FAO legend using digital techniques

    Kabindra Adhikari;Budiman Minasny;Mette B. Greve;Mogens H. Greve

  • Annual emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O, and ecosystem respiration, from eight organic soils in Western Denmark managed by agriculture

    S. O. Petersen;C. C. Hoffmann;C.-M. Schäfer;G. Blicher-Mathiesen

  • Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) analysis and risk assessment for soil compaction-A European perspective

    Per Schjønning;Jan J.H. van den Akker;Thomas Keller;Mogens H. Greve

  • Soil legacy data rescue via GlobalSoilMap and other international and national initiatives

    Dominique Arrouays;Johan G. B. Leenaars;Anne C. Richer-de-Forges;Kabindra Adhikari

  • Preliminary estimates of contemporary soil organic carbon stocks in Denmark using multiple datasets and four scaling-up methods

    Lars Krogh;Anette Noergaard;Martin Hermansen;Mogens Humlekrog Greve

  • Predictive mapping of soil organic carbon in wet cultivated lands using classification-tree based models: the case study of Denmark.

    Rania Bou Kheir;Mogens H. Greve;Peder K. Bøcher;Mette B. Greve

  • Changes in carbon stocks of Danish agricultural mineral soils between 1986 and 2009

    A. Taghizadeh‐Toosi;J. E. Olesen;K. Kristensen;L. Elsgaard

  • Spatial soil zinc content distribution from terrain parameters: a GIS-based decision-tree model in Lebanon.

    Rania Bou Kheir;Mogens H. Greve;Chadi Abdallah;Tommy Dalgaard

  • Evaluation of World Reference Base for Soil Resources and FAO Soil Map of the World using nationwide grid soil data from Denmark

    L. Krogh;M.H. Greve

  • Generating a Danish raster-based topsoil property map combining choropleth maps and point information

    Mogens H. Greve;Mette B. Greve;Peder K. Bøcher;Thomas Balstrøm

  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale

    Unknown

  • Cation-exchange capacity pedotransfer functions for Danish soils.

    Lars Krogh;Henrik Breuning-madsen;Mogens Humlekrog Greve

  • Modeling Soil Organic Carbon at Regional Scale by Combining Multi-Spectral Images with Laboratory Spectra

    Yi Peng;Xiong Xiong;Kabindra Adhikari;Maria Knadel

  • Selection of terrain attributes and its scale dependency on soil organic carbon prediction

    Zhixing Guo;Kabindra Adhikari;Kabindra Adhikari;Menaka Chellasamy;Mette B. Greve

  • Density of macropores as related to soil and earthworm community parameters in cultivated grasslands

    Mathieu André Maurice Lamande;Rodrigo S. Labouriau;Martin Holmstrup;Søren Bent Torp

  • On the quantitative relationships between environmental parameters and heavy metals pollution in Mediterranean soils using GIS regression-trees: The case study of Lebanon

    R. Bou Kheir;B. Shomar;M.B. Greve;M.H. Greve

  • Artificial neural networks and decision tree classification for predicting soil drainage classes in Denmark

    A. Beucher;A.B. Møller;M.H. Greve

  • Visible–Near Infrared Spectra as a Proxy for Topsoil Texture and Glacial Boundaries

    Maria Knadel;Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel;Fan Deng;Anton Thomsen

  • Digital Mapping of Toxic Metals in Qatari Soils Using Remote Sensing and Ancillary Data

    Yi Peng;Rania Bou Kheir;Kabindra Adhikari;Radoslaw Malinowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Moldrup
Per Moldrup Aalborg University
Lis Wollesen de Jonge
Lis Wollesen de Jonge Aarhus University
Emmanuel Arthur
Emmanuel Arthur Aarhus University
Budiman Minasny
Budiman Minasny University of Sydney
Alex B. McBratney
Alex B. McBratney University of Sydney
Kirsten Schelde
Kirsten Schelde Aarhus University
Alfred E. Hartemink
Alfred E. Hartemink University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lars Elsgaard
Lars Elsgaard Aarhus University
Markus Tuller
Markus Tuller University of Arizona
Per Schjønning
Per Schjønning Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related fields that are in high demand today. For those seeking flexibility and cost savings, exploring a budget friendly online general studies degree can be a practical starting point. These programs often provide foundational knowledge that complements environmental studies.

Students interested in focused, yet manageable academic paths might consider options classified among the easy bachelor degrees. These can help balance rigorous coursework with career preparation, especially if transitioning from unrelated fields.

For specialization, an online geology degree online offers insight into the earth’s systems, essential for many environmental roles. It complements environmental science knowledge with practical skills in analyzing geological aspects of environmental challenges.

Additionally, expertise in spatial data is increasingly valuable. The best GIS graduate programs provide advanced training in Geographic Information Systems, a critical tool used in environmental planning, conservation, and disaster management.

Best Scientists Citing Mogens Humlekrog Greve

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles