World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
4654
World Ranking
9010
National Ranking
572

Lars Johanning publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Johanning sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 240 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Lars Johanning D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lars Johanning sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lars Johanning is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom and specializes in the field of Engineering, with a particular focus on Ocean Engineering and related subfields. Their research contributions span several areas including computational mechanics, earth-surface processes, aerospace engineering, and civil and structural engineering.

The scientist's work heavily emphasizes topics related to wave and wind energy systems, coastal and marine dynamics, and fluid dynamics simulations and interactions. Additional research interests include fluid dynamics and vibration analysis, wind energy research and development, underwater vehicles and communication systems, and earthquake and tsunami effects.

Recent publications that highlight Johanning's research focus include:

  • Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review (2021, Energies)
  • Hydrodynamic investigation on an OWC wave energy converter integrated into an offshore wind turbine monopile (2020, Coastal Engineering)
  • Experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of a multi-chamber OWC-breakwater (2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews)
  • Life cycle assessment of floating offshore wind farms: An evaluation of operation and maintenance (2021, Applied Energy)
  • Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier (2020, Ocean Engineering)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Philipp R. Thies, Chenyu Zhao, Can Yang, Dezhi Ning, and Ajit C. Pillai.

Throughout their career, Johanning has published extensively in a number of scientific venues, most notably:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
  • Marine Energy Research
  • Energies
  • Renewable Energy

Johanning has also contributed to scholarly books through the University of Exeter, including work projecting future technologies such as autonomous robotic subsea intervention systems for offshore inspection, maintenance, and repair, expected to be published in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Mooring systems for wave energy converters: A review of design issues and choices

    Robert Ewan Harris;L. Johanning;Julian Wolfram

  • Measurements of static and dynamic mooring line damping and their importance for floating WEC devices

    Lars Johanning;George H. Smith;Julian Wolfram

  • Optimising the FDM additive manufacturing process to achieve maximum tensile strength: a state-of-the-art review

    Tessa Jane Gordelier;Philipp Rudolf Thies;Louis Turner;Lars Johanning

  • Sensitivity analysis of offshore wind farm operation and maintenance cost and availability

    Rebecca Martin;Iraklis Lazakis;Sami Barbouchi;Lars Johanning

  • Review and application of Rainflow residue processing techniques for accurate fatigue damage estimation

    Gabriel Marsh;Colin Wignall;Philipp R. Thies;Nigel Barltrop;Nigel Barltrop

  • Synthetic mooring ropes for marine renewable energy applications

    Samuel Weller;L. Johanning;Peter Davies;S. J. Banfield

  • Offshore wind farm electrical cable layout optimization

    A. Pillai;John Chick;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning;M Khorasanchi

  • Experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of a cylindrical dual-chamber Oscillating Water Column device

    De-zhi Ning;Yu Zhou;Robert Mayon;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

  • Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review

    Giovanni Rinaldi;Philipp R. Thies;Lars Johanning

  • Wave resource assessment along the Cornish coast (UK) from a 23-year hindcast dataset validated against buoy measurements

    Joana C.C. van Nieuwkoop;Helen C.M. Smith;George H. Smith;Lars Johanning

  • Mooring design approach for wave energy converters

    L Johanning;G H Smith;J Wolfram

  • Hydrodynamic investigation on an OWC wave energy converter integrated into an offshore wind turbine monopile

    Yu Zhou;Dezhi Ning;Wei Shi;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

  • Application of an offshore wind farm layout optimization methodology at Middelgrunden wind farm

    Ajit C. Pillai;John Chick;Mahdi Khorasanchi;Sami Barbouchi

  • Experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of a multi-chamber OWC-breakwater

    Xuanlie Zhao;Lidong Zhang;Mingwei Li;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

  • Life cycle assessment of floating offshore wind farms: an evaluation of operation and maintenance

    Anna Garcia-Teruel;Giovanni Rinaldi;Philipp R. Thies;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

  • Mooring line fatigue damage evaluation for floating marine energy converters: Field measurements and prediction

    Philipp R. Thies;Lars Johanning;Violette Harnois;Helen C.M. Smith

  • Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier

    Ed Mackay;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

  • Numerical model validation for mooring systems: Method and application for wave energy converters

    V. Harnois;S.D. Weller;L. Johanning;P.R. Thies

  • Incorporating stochastic operation and maintenance models into the techno-economic analysis of floating offshore wind farms

    Giovanni Rinaldi;Anna Garcia-Teruel;Henry Jeffrey;Philipp R. Thies

  • Assessing mechanical loading regimes and fatigue life of marine power cables in marine energy applications

    Philipp R. Thies;Lars Johanning;George H. Smith

  • Wave diffraction from a truncated cylinder with an upper porous sidewall and an inner column

    De-Zhi Ning;Xuan-Lie Zhao;Bin Teng;Lars Johanning;Lars Johanning

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Davies
Peter Davies French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Deborah Greaves
Deborah Greaves Plymouth University
Atilla Incecik
Atilla Incecik University of Strathclyde
Matthew J. Witt
Matthew J. Witt University of Exeter
Brendan J. Godley
Brendan J. Godley University of Exeter
Beth E. Scott
Beth E. Scott University of Aberdeen
Danling Tang
Danling Tang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Inigo J. Losada
Inigo J. Losada University of Cantabria
Ahmed F. Zobaa
Ahmed F. Zobaa Brunel University London
Selda Oterkus
Selda Oterkus University of Strathclyde

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students in the USA have access to an expanding range of online degrees and certificate options. Many learners are choosing to customize their education to suit their career ambitions, schedule, and budget needs. For those interested in branching out, programs like sports management programs online can combine engineering principles with leadership and organizational skills, opening doors to roles in athletics, facility operations, or events management.

Continuing education is now more flexible and affordable than ever. Specializations such as a masters in urban planning online are attractive options for tech-savvy students who want to impact city infrastructure or sustainability projects. Moreover, accelerated formats like the 6 month masters degree let working professionals quickly gain advanced qualifications without a lengthy commitment.

For those who want to boost their credentials and improve earning potential without pursuing a full degree, exploring the best certifications for jobs can lead to lucrative roles in engineering, technology, or specialized industries. These pathways empower students to adapt and thrive in a fast-changing workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Lars Johanning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles