World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
59
Citations
13275
World Ranking
2338
National Ranking
160

Peter Stansby publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stansby sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 381 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter Stansby D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Stansby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK)

Overview

Peter Stansby is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom and has a primary research focus in Engineering with extensive work spanning Ocean Engineering, Computational Mechanics, and Aerospace Engineering.

Their research frequently appears in venues such as the SSRN Electronic Journal, Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, Applied Ocean Research, Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy, and Energy.

Recent publications by Peter Stansby include:

  • Modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) for general-purpose smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): application to tank sloshing, dam break and fish pass problems, 2021, Computational Particle Mechanics
  • Review of smoothed particle hydrodynamics: towards converged Lagrangian flow modelling, 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Large-scale offshore wind energy installation in northwest India: Assessment of wind resource using Weather Research and Forecasting and levelized cost of energy, 2020, Wind Energy
  • Modelling marine turbine arrays in tidal flows, 2022, Journal of Hydraulic Research
  • Unsteady thrust on an oscillating wind turbine: Comparison of blade-element momentum theory with actuator-line CFD, 2020, Journal of Fluids and Structures

Their main research topics cover areas such as Wave and Wind Energy Systems, Wind Energy Research and Development, Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions, Coastal and Marine Dynamics, Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, and Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies.

Peter Stansby collaborates frequently with other researchers. Coauthors with whom they have worked extensively include Samuel Draycott, Tim Stallard, Benedict D. Rogers, Gangqiang Li, and Pablo Ouro.

Among professional recognitions, Peter Stansby has been named a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK) since 2001.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy and stability in incompressible SPH (ISPH) based on the projection method and a new approach

    Rui Xu;Peter Stansby;Dominique Laurence

  • Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method

    E. S. Lee;C. Moulinec;R. Xu;D. Violeau

  • Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics for free-surface flows: A generalised diffusion-based algorithm for stability and validations for impulsive flows and propagating waves

    S. J. Lind;R. Xu;P. K. Stansby;B. D. Rogers

  • The initial stages of dam-break flow

    P. K. Stansby;A. Chegini;T. C. D. Barnes

  • Integrated analysis of risks of coastal flooding and cliff erosion under scenarios of long term change

    R. J. Dawson;M. E. Dickson;R. J. Nicholls;J. W. Hall

  • The locking-on of vortex shedding due to the cross-stream vibration of circular cylinders in uniform and shear flows

    Peter Stansby

  • THE EFFECTS OF END PLATES ON THE BASE PRESSURE COEFFICIENT OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER.

    Peter Stansby

  • Variable resolution for SPH: A dynamic particle coalescing and splitting scheme

    R. Vacondio;B.D. Rogers;P.K. Stansby;P. Mignosa

  • Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with reduced temporal noise and generalised Fickian smoothing applied to body–water slam and efficient wave–body interaction

    Alex Skillen;Steven Lind;Peter K. Stansby;Benedict D. Rogers

  • State-of-the-art SPH solver DualSPHysics: from fluid dynamics to multiphysics problems.

    José M. Domínguez;Georgios Fourtakas;Corrado Altomare;Ricardo B. Canelas

  • Propulsive power contribution of a kite and a Flettner rotor on selected shipping routes

    Michael Traut;Paul Gilbert;Conor Walsh;Alice Bows

  • Flow around two circular cylinders by the random-vortex method

    A Slaouti;Peter Stansby

  • Turbulent flow and loading on a tidal stream turbine by LES and RANS

    I. Afgan;J. McNaughton;S. Rolfo;D.D. Apsley

  • Shallow‐water flow solver with non‐hydrostatic pressure: 2D vertical plane problems

    P. K. Stansby;J. G. Zhou

  • Modified dynamic boundary conditions (mDBC) for general-purpose smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): application to tank sloshing, dam break and fish pass problems

    A. English;J. M. Domínguez;R. Vacondio;A. J. C. Crespo

  • SPH Modeling of Shallow Flow with Open Boundaries for Practical Flood Simulation

    R. Vacondio;B. D. Rogers;P. K. Stansby;P. Mignosa

  • Simulation of caisson breakwater movement using 2-D SPH

    Benedict D. Rogers;Robert A. Dalrymple;Peter K. Stansby

  • Review of smoothed particle hydrodynamics: towards converged Lagrangian flow modelling.

    Steven J Lind;Benedict D Rogers;Peter K Stansby

  • Impulsively started flow around a circular cylinder by the vortex method

    P A Smith;Peter Stansby

  • The impact of sea level rise and climate change on inshore wave climate: A case study for East Anglia (UK)

    Nicolas Chini;Peter Stansby;James Leake;Judith Wolf

  • Experimental study of the mean wake of a tidal stream rotor in a shallow turbulent flow

    T.J. Stallard;T. Feng;P.K. Stansby

  • On the initial stages of dambreak flow

    Peter Stansby;A Chegini;T Barnes

Frequent Co-Authors

Benedict D. Rogers
Benedict D. Rogers University of Manchester
Robert J. Nicholls
Robert J. Nicholls University of East Anglia
Dominique Laurence
Dominique Laurence University of Manchester
Jim W. Hall
Jim W. Hall University of Oxford
Andrew R. Watkinson
Andrew R. Watkinson University of East Anglia
Judith Wolf
Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre
Alistair G.L. Borthwick
Alistair G.L. Borthwick University of Edinburgh
Richard Dawson
Richard Dawson Newcastle University
Stephen A. Billings
Stephen A. Billings University of Sheffield
Jason Lowe
Jason Lowe Met Office

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Stansby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles