World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
4755
World Ranking
6464
National Ranking
665

Beth E. Scott publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Scott sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 133 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Beth E. Scott D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Scott sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Inter-annual variability in the timing of stratification and the spring bloom in the North-western North Sea

    Jonathan Sharples;Oliver N. Ross;Beth E. Scott;Simon P.R. Greenstreet

  • Sub-surface hotspots in shallow seas: fine-scale limited locations of top predator foraging habitat indicated by tidal mixing and sub-surface chlorophyll

    B.E. Scott;J. Sharples;Oliver N. Ross;J. Wang

  • Effects of population size/age structure, condition and temporal dynamics of spawning on reproductive output in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)

    Beth E. Scott;Beth E. Scott;Gudrun Marteinsdottir;Gavin A. Begg;Peter J. Wright

  • Analysis of the spatial distributions of mature cod (gadus morhua) and haddock (melanogrammus aeglefinus) abundance in the North Sea (1980-1999) using generalised additive models

    Richard Hedger;Eddie McKenzie;Mike Heath;Peter Wright

  • Linking sandeel consumption and the likelihood of starvation in harbour porpoises in the Scottish North Sea: could climate change mean more starving porpoises?

    Colin D MacLeod;M. Begoña Santos;Robert J Reid;Beth E Scott

  • Black-legged kittiwakes as indicators of environmental change in the North Sea: Evidence from long-term studies

    S. Wanless;M. Frederiksen;F. Daunt;B.E. Scott

  • Potential effects of maternal factors on spawning stock-recruitment relationships under varying fishing pressure

    Beth Scott;Gudrun Marteinsdottir;Peter Wright

  • Investigating fine-scale spatio-temporal predator-prey patterns in dynamic marine ecosystems: a functional data analysis approach

    Clare B. Embling;Janine Illian;Eric Armstrong;Jeroen van der Kooij;Jeroen van der Kooij

  • Confusion reigns? A review of marine megafauna interactions with tidal-stream environments

    Steven Benjamins;Andrew C. Dale;Gordon Hastie;James J. Waggitt

  • The effects of environmental factors on daytime sandeel distribution and abundance on the Dogger Bank

    Jeroen van der Kooij;Jeroen van der Kooij;Beth E. Scott;Steven Mackinson

  • Seabird conservation and tidal stream and wave power generation: Information needs for predicting and managing potential impacts

    R. Langton;I.M. Davies;B.E. Scott

  • A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource

    Daniel Coles;Athanasios Angeloudis;Deborah Greaves;Gordon Hastie

  • Modelling the growth of herring from four different stocks in the North Sea

    M Heath;Beth Emily Scott;A D Bryant

  • The use of an unsupervised learning approach for characterizing latent behaviors in accelerometer data

    Marianna Chimienti;Marianna Chimienti;Thomas Cornulier;Ellie Owen;Mark Bolton

  • Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonusponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in British Columbia: field trapping studies

    J. E. Conn;J. H. Borden;B. E. Scott;L. M. Friskie

  • Variation in the abundance of sandeels Ammodytes marinus off southeast Scotland: an evaluation of area-closure fisheries management and stock abundance assessment methods

    Simon P.R. Greenstreet;Eric Armstrong;Henrik Mosegaard;Henrik Jensen

  • Spacing system of the tundra vole (Microtus oeconomus) during the breeding season in Canada's western Arctic

    Xavier Lambin;Charles J. Krebs;Beth Scott

  • A Self-Contained Subsea Platform for Acoustic Monitoring of the Environment Around Marine Renewable Energy Devices–Field Deployments at Wave and Tidal Energy Sites in Orkney, Scotland

    Benjamin J. Williamson;Philippe Blondel;Eric Armstrong;Paul S. Bell

  • Should phytoplankton be a key consideration for marine management

    Jacqueline F. Tweddle;Matthew Gubbins;Beth E. Scott

  • Rapid-response recorders reveal interplay between marine physics and seabird behaviour

    F. Daunt;G. Peters;Beth Emily Scott;D. Gremillet

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Sharples
Jonathan Sharples University of Liverpool
Ian M. Davies
Ian M. Davies Marine Scotland
Sarah Wanless
Sarah Wanless Natural Environment Research Council
Judith Wolf
Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre
Vladimir Nikora
Vladimir Nikora University of Aberdeen
Francis Daunt
Francis Daunt Natural Environment Research Council
Graham J. Pierce
Graham J. Pierce Spanish National Research Council
Peter J. Wright
Peter J. Wright Marine Scotland
Justin M. J. Travis
Justin M. J. Travis University of Aberdeen
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Beth E. Scott

Recently Published Articles