World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 929 925 50 50 220 4608
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2652 2486 194 176 198 5022

Selda Oterkus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Selda Oterkus between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Selda Oterkus published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 15.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2021. 38 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2021. 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 45 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 20 publications
2013 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Selda Oterkus: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 1
2014 5
2015 5
2016 3
2017 12
2018 12
2019 15
2020 34
2021 45
2022 18
2023 18
2024 18
2025 20
Total 206
Download as CSV

Selda Oterkus publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Selda Oterkus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 198 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115 198
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Selda Oterkus D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Selda Oterkus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Selda Oterkus is affiliated with the University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Engineering, with significant contributions across several subfields including Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Computational Mechanics.

Their work encompasses a variety of specialized topics, focusing on:

  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

Their publication record includes contributions to several key academic venues:

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling
  • Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
  • Procedia Structural Integrity
  • Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Selda Oterkus include:

  • Structural health monitoring of an offshore wind turbine tower using iFEM methodology, 2020, Ocean Engineering
  • An energy-based peridynamic model for fatigue cracking, 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Dynamic crack arrest analysis by ordinary state-based peridynamics, 2020, International Journal of Fracture
  • Modelling of cracks with frictional contact based on peridynamics, 2021, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
  • Peridynamic Modelling of Fracture in Polycrystalline Ice, 2020, Journal of Mechanics

Frequent collaborators in their work include Erkan Oterkus, Zhenghao Yang, Satoyuki Tanaka, Cong Tien Nguyen, and Bingquan Wang. Collaboration with these co-authors has led to multiple publications across diverse aspects of engineering mechanics and materials.

Best Publications

  • Peridynamics review

    Unknown

  • Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening

    Erdogan Madenci;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamic thermal diffusion

    Selda Oterkus;Erdogan Madenci;Abigail Agwai

  • Fully coupled peridynamic thermomechanics

    Selda Oterkus;Erdogan Madenci;Abigail Agwai

  • Peridynamics for bending of beams and plates with transverse shear deformation

    C. Diyaroglu;E. Oterkus;S. Oterkus;E. Madenci

  • Fully coupled poroelastic peridynamic formulation for fluid-filled fractures

    Selda Oterkus;Erdogan Madenci;Erkan Oterkus

  • Structural health monitoring of an offshore wind turbine tower using iFEM methodology

    Mingyang Li;Adnan Kefal;Erkan Oterkus;Selda Oterkus

  • Ordinary state-based peridynamics for thermoviscoelastic deformation

    Erdogan Madenci;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamic modeling of fuel pellet cracking

    Selda Oterkus;Erdogan Madenci

  • An energy-based peridynamic model for fatigue cracking

    Cong Tien Nguyen;Selda Oterkus;Erkan Oterkus

  • Fully coupled thermomechanical analysis of laminated composites by using ordinary state based peridynamic theory

    Yan Gao;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamics for the thermomechanical behavior of shell structures

    Cong Tien Nguyen;Cong Tien Nguyen;Selda Oterkus

  • Dynamic crack arrest analysis by ordinary state-based peridynamics

    Michiya Imachi;Satoyuki Tanaka;Murat Ozdemir;Tinh Quoc Bui

  • Predicting fracture evolution during lithiation process using peridynamics

    Hanlin Wang;Erkan Oterkus;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamics For The Solution Of Multiphysics Problems

    Selda Oterkus

  • Ordinary state based peridynamic modelling for fully coupled thermoelastic problems

    Yan Gao;Selda Oterkus

  • A computational approach based on ordinary state-based peridynamics with new transition bond for dynamic fracture analysis

    Michiya Imachi;Satoyuki Tanaka;Tinh Quoc Bui;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamics formulation for beam structures to predict damage in offshore structures

    Cong Tien Nguyen;Cong Tien Nguyen;Selda Oterkus

  • An Euler-Bernoulli beam formulation in ordinary state-based peridynamic framework

    Cagan Diyaroglu;Erkan Oterkus;Selda Oterkus

  • Peridynamic model for visco-hyperelastic material deformation in different strain rates

    Yunke Huang;Yunke Huang;Selda Oterkus;Hong Hou;Erkan Oterkus

  • Implementation of peridynamic beam and plate formulations in finite element framework

    Zhenghao Yang;Erkan Oterkus;Cong Tien Nguyen;Selda Oterkus

  • Dynamic propagation of a macrocrack interacting with parallel small cracks

    Bozo Vazic;Hanlin Wang;Cagan Diyaroglu;Selda Oterkus

Frequent Co-Authors

Erkan Oterkus
Erkan Oterkus Stony Brook University
Erdogan Madenci
Erdogan Madenci University of Arizona
Satoyuki Tanaka
Satoyuki Tanaka Kagoshima University
Tinh Quoc Bui
Tinh Quoc Bui Duy Tan University
Lars Johanning
Lars Johanning University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to diverse related fields, some of which can be pursued online. For instance, those interested in applied sciences might consider programs like a veteran friendly online speech pathology degree, offering flexibility and specialized support.

Accelerated study options are increasingly popular for students wanting to fast-track their education without compromising quality. This is reflected in offerings like the 5-year speech pathology programs, allowing learners to enter the workforce sooner.

For those intrigued by behavioral analysis or security-related roles, pathways such as becoming an FBI profiler provide an exciting blend of psychology, investigation, and technology. These roles demand strong analytical and problem-solving skills akin to engineering disciplines.

Similarly, various counseling paths complement engineering careers, especially in leadership or team-focused roles. Exploring different types of counseling degrees can enhance interpersonal skills vital in collaborative projects and organizational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Selda Oterkus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles