World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
3748
World Ranking
3190
National Ranking
25

Ali Javili publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Javili sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 120 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Ali Javili D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Javili sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Peridynamics review

    Unknown

  • Aspects of Computational Homogenization at Finite Deformations: A Unifying Review From Reuss' to Voigt's Bound

    Saba Saeb;Paul Steinmann;Ali Javili

  • Thermomechanics of Solids With Lower-Dimensional Energetics: On the Importance of Surface, Interface, and Curve Structures at the Nanoscale. A Unifying Review

    A. Javili;A. McBride;P. Steinmann

  • Geometrically nonlinear higher-gradient elasticity with energetic boundaries

    A. Javili;F. dell'Isola;P. Steinmann

  • Computational homogenization in magneto-mechanics

    A. Javili;Georges Chatzigeorgiou;P. Steinmann

  • A finite element framework for continua with boundary energies. Part II: The three-dimensional case

    A. Javili;Paul Steinmann

  • Micro-to-macro transition accounting for general imperfect interfaces

    Ali Javili;Paul Steinmann;Jörn Mosler

  • A finite element framework for continua with boundary energies. Part II: The three-dimensional case

    Unknown

  • Unified magnetomechanical homogenization framework with application to magnetorheological elastomers

    Georges Chatzigeorgiou;Ali Javili;Paul Steinmann

  • General imperfect interfaces

    A. Javili;S. Kaessmair;P. Steinmann

  • Generalized interfacial energy and size effects in composites

    Unknown

  • A unified computational framework for bulk and surface elasticity theory: a curvilinear-coordinate-based finite element methodology

    A. Javili;A. Mcbride;P. Steinmann;B. D. Reddy

  • On thermomechanical solids with boundary structures

    A. Javili;P. Steinmann

  • Homogenization of composites with extended general interfaces: comprehensive review and unified modeling

    Soheil Firooz;Paul Steinmann;Ali Javili

  • Geometrically nonlinear continuum thermomechanics with surface energies coupled to diffusion

    A.T. McBride;A. Javili;P. Steinmann;S. Bargmann

  • Continuum-kinematics-inspired peridynamics. Mechanical problems

    Ali Javili;A. T. McBride;P. Steinmann;P. Steinmann

  • On molecular statics and surface-enhanced continuum modeling of nano-structures

    D. Davydov;A. Javili;P. Steinmann

  • Micro-to-macro transitions for heterogeneous material layers accounting for in-plane stretch

    A. McBride;J. Mergheim;A. Javili;P. Steinmann

  • Understanding geometric instabilities in thin films via a multi-layer model

    Unknown

  • Micro‐to‐macro transitions for continua with surface structure at the microscale

    Ali Javili;Andrew McBride;Julia Mergheim;Paul Steinmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Steinmann
Paul Steinmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ellen Kuhl
Ellen Kuhl Stanford University
Peter Wriggers
Peter Wriggers University of Hannover
Francesco dell’Isola
Francesco dell’Isola University of L'Aquila
Matti Ristinmaa
Matti Ristinmaa Lund University
George Chatzigeorgiou
George Chatzigeorgiou Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can provide valuable insights for students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Understanding type of counselors involved in academic and career advising may help streamline your educational journey. These professionals can guide you in selecting programs that align with your career goals.

For those seeking flexibility, it’s essential to consider the easiest counseling degrees that still provide robust support, particularly if you plan to balance studies with other commitments. Knowing which programs are more manageable can make a significant difference in your academic success.

Additionally, accelerated options like the accelerated bcba program demonstrate how fast-track online degrees are available across disciplines. These formats may inspire engineering students to look for similar pathways to complete their degrees more efficiently.

Finally, when applying for graduate programs in engineering or related fields, understanding how many applications to submit is crucial. The guide on how many slp grad schools should i apply to offers useful strategies that can be adapted to engineering graduate admissions, ensuring the best chance of acceptance.

Best Scientists Citing Ali Javili

Recently Published Articles