World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 39 7811 7536 284 280 123 5004

Emilio Turco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emilio Turco between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emilio Turco published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2016. 14 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2016. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 18 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
1991 2025

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emilio Turco: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 0
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 3
2013 3
2014 1
2015 1
2016 18
2017 14
2018 9
2019 15
2020 8
2021 10
2022 9
2023 8
2024 7
2025 7
Total 130
Download as CSV

Emilio Turco publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Turco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341 123
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Emilio Turco D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Turco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385 39
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Emilio Turco is affiliated with the University of Sassari in Italy, with a primary research focus in the field of Engineering. Their work covers multiple subfields, especially Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Structural Analysis and Optimization
  • Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
  • Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
  • Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
  • Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Railway Engineering and Dynamics

Emilio Turco has published extensively in several prominent venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
  • Mechanics Research Communications
  • Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics
  • Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems
  • International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Emilio Turco include:

  • "A Lagrangian Hencky-type non-linear model suitable for metamaterials design of shearable and extensible slender deformable bodies alternative to Timoshenko theory" (2020) published in International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
  • "Equilibria determination of elastic articulated duoskelion beams in 2D via a Riks-type algorithm" (2020) published in International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics
  • "Stiffness optimization in nonlinear pantographic structures" (2020) published in Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
  • "Granular micromechanics-based identification of isotropic strain gradient parameters for elastic geometrically nonlinear deformations" (2021) published in ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
  • "Kresling tube metamaterial exhibits extreme large-displacement buckling behavior" (2023) published in Mechanics Research Communications

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Emilio Barchiesi
  • Francesco dell'Isola
  • Antonio Bilotta
  • Andrea Causin
  • Margherita Solci

Best Publications

  • Pantographic metamaterials: an example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Pierre Seppecher;Jean Jacques Alibert;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki

  • Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Mario Spagnuolo;Mario Spagnuolo;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • Isogeometric analysis of plane-curved beams:

    Antonio Cazzani;Marcello Malagù;Emilio Turco

  • Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models

    Emilio Turco;Francesco dell’Isola;Antonio Cazzani;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Constitutive models for strongly curved beams in the frame of isogeometric analysis

    Antonio Cazzani;Marcello Malagù;Emilio Turco;Flavio Stochino

  • Continuum modelling of pantographic sheets for out-of-plane bifurcation and vibrational analysis

    I. Giorgio;N. L. Rizzi;E. Turco

  • A review on 2D models for the description of pantographic fabrics

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Turco;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Isogeometric analysis: a powerful numerical tool for the elastic analysis of historical masonry arches

    Antonio Cazzani;Marcello Malagù;Emilio Turco

  • Large deformations induced in planar pantographic sheets by loads applied on fibers: Experimental validation of a discrete Lagrangian model

    Emilio Turco;Maciej Golaszewski;Antonio Cazzani;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Enhanced Piola–Hencky discrete models for pantographic sheets with pivots without deformation energy: numerics and experiments

    Emilio Turco;Anil Misra;Marek Pawlikowski;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Pantographic lattices with non-orthogonal fibres: Experiments and their numerical simulations

    Emilio Turco;Maciej Golaszewski;Ivan Giorgio;Francesco D'Annibale

  • Fiber rupture in sheared planar pantographic sheets: Numerical and experimental evidence

    Emilio Turco;Francesco dell’Isola;Nicola Luigi Rizzi;Roman Grygoruk

  • A second gradient formulation for a 2D fabric sheet with inextensible fibres

    Luca Placidi;Leopoldo Greco;Sara Bucci;Emilio Turco

  • An analytical assessment of finite element and isogeometric analyses of the whole spectrum of Timoshenko beams

    Antonio Cazzani;Flavio Stochino;Flavio Stochino;Emilio Turco

  • Pantographic structures presenting statistically distributed defects: Numerical investigations of the effects on deformation fields

    Emilio Turco;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Discrete is it enough? The revival of Piola–Hencky keynotes to analyze three-dimensional Elastica

    Emilio Turco

  • Tools for the numerical solution of inverse problems in structural mechanics: review and research perspectives

    Emilio Turco

  • King post truss as a motif for internal structure of (meta)material with controlled elastic properties

    Emilio Turco;Ivan Giorgio;Anil Misra;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Wrinkling in engineering fabrics: a comparison between two different comprehensive modelling approaches

    I. Giorgio;P. Harrison;F. dell'Isola;J. Alsayednoor

  • A nonlinear Lagrangian particle model for grains assemblies including grain relative rotations

    Emilio Turco;Francesco dell'Isola;Anil Misra

  • Performance of a high-continuity finite element in three-dimensional elasticity

    Antonio Bilotta;Giovanni Formica;Emilio Turco

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco dell’Isola
Francesco dell’Isola University of L'Aquila
Anil Misra
Anil Misra University of Kansas
Ivan Giorgio
Ivan Giorgio University of L'Aquila
Emilio Barchiesi
Emilio Barchiesi University of Sassari
Antonino Morassi
Antonino Morassi University of Udine
Luca Placidi
Luca Placidi UniNettuno University
Victor A. Eremeyev
Victor A. Eremeyev University of Cagliari
Giovanni Alessandrini
Giovanni Alessandrini University of Trieste
François Hild
François Hild École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Costas P. Grigoropoulos
Costas P. Grigoropoulos University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Engineering and Technology in the USA can open doors to a variety of career pathways. Many students further enhance their skills by exploring related fields through flexible online degree programs. These options allow you to build interdisciplinary expertise and expand your career prospects beyond traditional engineering roles.

Office administration classes provide essential organizational and management skills, crucial for professionals aiming for leadership roles within technical environments. For those interested in broader business knowledge, an online degree business administration can complement your technical background and prepare you for management positions.

Aspiring to lead teams or manage departments? Explore organizational leadership master's programs, which focus on strategic thinking and effective leadership skills. Meanwhile, professionals keen on optimizing operational processes can benefit from the best mba for operations management.

By combining engineering expertise with organizational, administrative, or business education, you can diversify your skillset and boost your employability in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Emilio Turco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles