World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emilio Barchiesi

Emilio Barchiesi

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
4038
World Ranking
2902
National Ranking
103

Emilio Barchiesi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Barchiesi sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 104 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Emilio Barchiesi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Barchiesi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical metamaterials: a state of the art:

    Emilio Barchiesi;Mario Spagnuolo;Luca Placidi

  • Pantographic metamaterials: an example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Pierre Seppecher;Jean Jacques Alibert;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki

  • Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Mario Spagnuolo;Mario Spagnuolo;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A strain gradient variational approach to damage: a comparison with damage gradient models and numerical results

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Anil Misra

  • Energy approach to brittle fracture in strain-gradient modelling

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A review on 2D models for the description of pantographic fabrics

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Turco;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Two-dimensional strain gradient damage modeling: a variational approach

    Luca Placidi;Anil Misra;Emilio Barchiesi

  • Large in-plane elastic deformations of bi-pantographic fabrics: asymptotic homogenization and experimental validation

    Emilio Barchiesi;Simon R Eugster;Francesco dell’Isola;François Hild

  • Out-of-plane buckling of pantographic fabrics in displacement-controlled shear tests: experimental results and model validation

    Emilio Barchiesi;Gregor Ganzosch;Christian Liebold;Luca Placidi

  • Simulation results for damage with evolving microstructure and growing strain gradient moduli

    Luca Placidi;Anil Misra;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A Lagrangian Hencky-type non-linear model suitable for metamaterials design of shearable and extensible slender deformable bodies alternative to Timoshenko theory

    Emilio Turco;Emilio Barchiesi;Ivan Giorgio;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Pantographic beam: a complete second gradient 1D-continuum in plane

    Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi;Simon R. Eugster;Luca Placidi;Luca Placidi;Francesco dell’Isola;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Hemivariational continuum approach for granular solids with damage-induced anisotropy evolution:

    Dmitry Timofeev;Emilio Barchiesi;Anil Misra;Luca Placidi

  • Numerical identification of constitutive parameters in reduced-order bi-dimensional models for pantographic structures: application to out-of-plane buckling

    Michele De Angelo;Emilio Barchiesi;Ivan Giorgio;Ivan Giorgio;B. Emek Abali

  • On the Validation of Homogenized Modeling for Bi-Pantographic Metamaterials via Digital Image Correlation

    Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola;François Hild

  • Micromechanics-based elasto-plastic–damage energy formulation for strain gradient solids with granular microstructure

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi;Anil Misra;Dmitry Timofeev

  • Three-point bending test of pantographic blocks: numerical and experimental investigation:

    M Erden Yildizdag;M Erden Yildizdag;Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Identification of a geometrically nonlinear micromorphic continuum via granular micromechanics

    Anil Misra;Luca Placidi;Francesco dell’Isola;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • On a hemi-variational formulation for a 2D elasto-plastic-damage strain gradient solid with granular microstructure

    Unknown

  • A 1D Continuum Model for Beams with Pantographic Microstructure: Asymptotic Micro-Macro Identification and Numerical Results

    Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola;Francesco dell’Isola;Marco Laudato;Luca Placidi;Luca Placidi

Frequent Co-Authors

Luca Placidi
Luca Placidi UniNettuno University
Francesco dell’Isola
Francesco dell’Isola University of L'Aquila
Anil Misra
Anil Misra University of Kansas
Emilio Turco
Emilio Turco University of Sassari
François Hild
François Hild École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Ivan Giorgio
Ivan Giorgio University of L'Aquila
Ugo Andreaus
Ugo Andreaus Sapienza University of Rome
Victor A. Eremeyev
Victor A. Eremeyev University of Cagliari
Tasawar Hayat
Tasawar Hayat Quaid-i-Azam University
Costas P. Grigoropoulos
Costas P. Grigoropoulos University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering graduates often explore a variety of related fields to broaden their career opportunities. One such avenue is counseling, where understanding type of counselors can help engineers transition into roles focusing on mental health and organizational development.

For those interested in quick career pivots, some programs offer the easy to get counseling degree, designed to provide essential credentials with flexible study options. This can be particularly helpful for professionals seeking adjunct qualifications or alternate pathways.

In addition, accelerated programs such as the accelerated bcba program are gaining popularity. These fast-track online master’s degrees help individuals gain specialized skills efficiently, complementing an engineering background for roles in behavioral analysis and technology management.

Meanwhile, those aiming to specialize in speech and language pathology should research slp graduate programs, which typically require strong academic backgrounds and competitive acceptance rates. This pathway illustrates the diverse options engineers have to leverage their analytical skills in allied health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Emilio Barchiesi

Recently Published Articles