World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emilio Barchiesi

Emilio Barchiesi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 34 2902 2725 103 102 104 4038

Emilio Barchiesi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emilio Barchiesi between 2016 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emilio Barchiesi published across 10 years, from 2016 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 20 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2016: 1 publication 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 6 publications
2016 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emilio Barchiesi: publications per year, 2016 to 2025
Year Publications
2016 1
2017 6
2018 9
2019 20
2020 18
2021 23
2022 17
2023 9
2024 14
2025 6
Total 123
Download as CSV

Emilio Barchiesi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Barchiesi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 104 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91 104
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Emilio Barchiesi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilio Barchiesi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189 34
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Mechanical metamaterials: a state of the art:

    Emilio Barchiesi;Mario Spagnuolo;Luca Placidi

  • Pantographic metamaterials: an example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Pierre Seppecher;Jean Jacques Alibert;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki;Tomasz Lekszycki

  • Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses

    Francesco dell’Isola;Pierre Seppecher;Mario Spagnuolo;Mario Spagnuolo;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A strain gradient variational approach to damage: a comparison with damage gradient models and numerical results

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Anil Misra

  • Energy approach to brittle fracture in strain-gradient modelling

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A review on 2D models for the description of pantographic fabrics

    Luca Placidi;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Turco;Nicola Luigi Rizzi

  • Two-dimensional strain gradient damage modeling: a variational approach

    Luca Placidi;Anil Misra;Emilio Barchiesi

  • Out-of-plane buckling of pantographic fabrics in displacement-controlled shear tests: experimental results and model validation

    Emilio Barchiesi;Gregor Ganzosch;Christian Liebold;Luca Placidi

  • Simulation results for damage with evolving microstructure and growing strain gradient moduli

    Luca Placidi;Anil Misra;Emilio Barchiesi

  • Pantographic beam: a complete second gradient 1D-continuum in plane

    Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi;Simon R. Eugster;Luca Placidi;Luca Placidi;Francesco dell’Isola;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Numerical identification of constitutive parameters in reduced-order bi-dimensional models for pantographic structures: application to out-of-plane buckling

    Michele De Angelo;Emilio Barchiesi;Ivan Giorgio;Ivan Giorgio;B. Emek Abali

  • On the Validation of Homogenized Modeling for Bi-Pantographic Metamaterials via Digital Image Correlation

    Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola;François Hild

  • Three-point bending test of pantographic blocks: numerical and experimental investigation:

    M Erden Yildizdag;M Erden Yildizdag;Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola

  • Identification of a geometrically nonlinear micromorphic continuum via granular micromechanics

    Anil Misra;Luca Placidi;Francesco dell’Isola;Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi

  • A 1D Continuum Model for Beams with Pantographic Microstructure: Asymptotic Micro-Macro Identification and Numerical Results

    Emilio Barchiesi;Emilio Barchiesi;Francesco dell’Isola;Francesco dell’Isola;Marco Laudato;Luca Placidi;Luca Placidi

Frequent Co-Authors

Luca Placidi
Luca Placidi UniNettuno University
Francesco dell’Isola
Francesco dell’Isola University of L'Aquila
Anil Misra
Anil Misra University of Kansas
Emilio Turco
Emilio Turco University of Sassari
François Hild
François Hild École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Ivan Giorgio
Ivan Giorgio University of L'Aquila
Ugo Andreaus
Ugo Andreaus Sapienza University of Rome
Victor A. Eremeyev
Victor A. Eremeyev University of Cagliari
Tasawar Hayat
Tasawar Hayat Quaid-i-Azam University
Costas P. Grigoropoulos
Costas P. Grigoropoulos University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering graduates often explore a variety of related fields to broaden their career opportunities. One such avenue is counseling, where understanding type of counselors can help engineers transition into roles focusing on mental health and organizational development.

For those interested in quick career pivots, some programs offer the easy to get counseling degree, designed to provide essential credentials with flexible study options. This can be particularly helpful for professionals seeking adjunct qualifications or alternate pathways.

In addition, accelerated programs such as the accelerated bcba program are gaining popularity. These fast-track online master’s degrees help individuals gain specialized skills efficiently, complementing an engineering background for roles in behavioral analysis and technology management.

Meanwhile, those aiming to specialize in speech and language pathology should research slp graduate programs, which typically require strong academic backgrounds and competitive acceptance rates. This pathway illustrates the diverse options engineers have to leverage their analytical skills in allied health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Emilio Barchiesi

Recently Published Articles