World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
54
Citations
10070
World Ranking
848
National Ranking
40

Patrizio Neff publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizio Neff sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 314 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Patrizio Neff D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizio Neff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrizio Neff is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering. Their work spans multiple specialized subfields including Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Applied Mathematics.

The main topics addressed by Patrizio Neff's research include:

  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Composite Material Mechanics
  • Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

Neff has authored numerous papers, with recent examples including:

  • "Unfolding engineering metamaterials design: Relaxed micromorphic modeling of large-scale acoustic meta-structures" (2022), published in the Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • "Size-effects of metamaterial beams subjected to pure bending: on boundary conditions and parameter identification in the relaxed micromorphic model" (2023), published in Computational Mechanics
  • "Nečas-Lions lemma revisited: An Lp-version of the generalized Korn inequality for incompatible tensor fields" (2021), published in Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
  • "Frequency- and angle-dependent scattering of a finite-sized meta-structure via the relaxed micromorphic model" (2020), published in Archive of Applied Mechanics
  • "Analytical solutions of the simple shear problem for micromorphic models and other generalized continua" (2021), published in Archive of Applied Mechanics

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Neff include:

  • Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba
  • Angela Madeo
  • Gianluca Rizzi
  • Peter Lewintan
  • Adam Sky

Neff's work is often disseminated through a number of key publication venues, such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
  • PAMM
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Journal of Elasticity

Their contributions represent an intersection of theoretical and practical aspects of material mechanics, including the development and application of mathematical methods to study elasticity, composite materials, and acoustic wave phenomena. This research supports advancements in microstructured material design and computational modeling approaches relevant to engineering and applied sciences.

Best Publications

  • Invariant formulation of hyperelastic transverse isotropy based on polyconvex free energy functions

    Jörg Schröder;Patrizio Neff

  • Polyconvexity of generalized polynomial-type hyperelastic strain energy functions for near-incompressibility

    Stefan Hartmann;Patrizio Neff

  • A polyconvex framework for soft biological tissues. Adjustment to experimental data

    D. Balzani;P. Neff;J. Schröder;G.A. Holzapfel

  • A unifying perspective: the relaxed linear micromorphic continuum

    Patrizio Neff;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Angela Madeo;Luca Placidi

  • A variational approach for materially stable anisotropic hyperelasticity

    Jörg Schröder;Patrizio Neff;Daniel Balzani

  • Wave propagation in relaxed micromorphic continua: modeling metamaterials with frequency band-gaps

    Angela Madeo;Patrizio Neff;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Luca Placidi

  • A Geometrically Exact Micromorphic Model for Elastic Metallic Foams Accounting for Affine Microstructure. Modelling, Existence of Minimizers, Identification of Moduli and Computational Results

    Patrizio Neff;Samuel Forest

  • Wave propagation in relaxed micromorphic continua: modelling metamaterials with frequency band-gaps

    Angela Madeo;Patrizio Neff;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Luca Placidi

  • Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks

    Dominik K. Klein;Mauricio Fernández;Robert J. Martin;Patrizio Neff

  • A finite-strain elastic–plastic Cosserat theory for polycrystals with grain rotations

    Patrizio Neff

  • Existence of minimizers for a finite-strain micromorphic elastic solid

    Patrizio Neff

  • Existence, Uniqueness and Stability in Linear Cosserat Elasticity for Weakest Curvature Conditions

    Jena Jeong;Patrizio Neff

  • The Cosserat couple modulus for continuous solids is zero viz the linearized Cauchy-stress tensor is symmetric

    Patrizio Neff

  • The Exponentiated Hencky-Logarithmic Strain Energy. Part I: Constitutive Issues and Rank-One Convexity

    Patrizio Neff;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba;Johannes Lankeit

  • Optimal BV estimates for a discontinuous Galerkin method for linear elasticity

    Adrian Lew;Patrizio Neff;Deborah Sulsky;Michael Ortiz

  • Geometry of Logarithmic Strain Measures in Solid Mechanics

    Patrizio Neff;Bernhard Eidel;Robert J. Martin

  • A new paradigm: the linear isotropic Cosserat model with conformally invariant curvature energy.

    Patrizio Neff;Jena Jeong

  • On Korn's first inequality with non-constant coefficients

    Patrizio Neff

  • Anisotropic polyconvex energies on the basis of crystallographic motivated structural tensors

    J. Schröder;P. Neff;V. Ebbing

  • Curl bounds Grad on SO(3)

    Patrizio Neff;Ingo Münch

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela Madeo
Angela Madeo TU Dortmund University
Werner Wagner
Werner Wagner Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Luca Placidi
Luca Placidi UniNettuno University
Elias C. Aifantis
Elias C. Aifantis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Gerhard A. Holzapfel
Gerhard A. Holzapfel Graz University of Technology
Samuel Forest
Samuel Forest Mines ParisTech
David Yang Gao
David Yang Gao Federation University Australia
David J. Steigmann
David J. Steigmann University of California, Berkeley
Sanjay Govindjee
Sanjay Govindjee University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs like accelerated online mba programs offer a swift transition for those interested in leadership roles within analytical industries. These programs are designed to fast-track your business education, reducing time and cost.

Another popular option is an online marketing degree, which blends quantitative and creative skills, ideal for math graduates looking to enter data-driven marketing fields. Affordable tuition and solid earning potential make this a practical choice.

If time is a consideration, many look into year long mba programs that provide comprehensive education without a lengthy commitment. Meanwhile, flexibility is key for transfer students, with options like can you transfer mba programs allowing course credits to carry over, simplifying the transition between institutions.

By understanding these alternatives, math students can strategically plan their education to match career goals, balancing time, cost, and program flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Patrizio Neff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles