World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Markus Kästner

Markus Kästner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2752 2583 95 90 193 3305

Markus Kästner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Kästner between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Kästner published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2021. 32 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 53 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 18 publications
1998 2025

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Kästner: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 5
2014 6
2015 1
2016 8
2017 11
2018 9
2019 14
2020 12
2021 53
2022 19
2023 33
2024 14
2025 18
Total 228
Download as CSV

Markus Kästner publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kästner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 193 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140 193
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Kästner D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Kästner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Phase-field modelling of interface failure in brittle materials

    Arne Claus Hansen-Dörr;René de Borst;Paul Hennig;Markus Kästner

  • A numerical study on magnetostrictive phenomena in magnetorheological elastomers

    Unknown

  • Bézier extraction and adaptive refinement of truncated hierarchical NURBS

    Unknown

  • A nonlinear fractional viscoelastic material model for polymers

    Unknown

  • Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physics

    Unknown

  • Inelastic material behavior of polymers – Experimental characterization, formulation and implementation of a material model

    Unknown

  • FE$${}^\textrm{ANN}$$: an efficient data-driven multiscale approach based on physics-constrained neural networks and automated data mining

    Unknown

  • A convergence study of phase-field models for brittle fracture

    Thomas Linse;Paul Hennig;Markus Kästner;René de Borst

  • Automated constitutive modeling of isotropic hyperelasticity based on artificial neural networks

    Unknown

  • Phase-field modeling of crack branching and deflection in heterogeneous media

    Arne Claus Hansen-Dörr;Franz Dammaß;René de Borst;Markus Kästner

  • Modeling of magnetic hystereses in soft MREs filled with NdFeB particles

    K A Kalina;J Brummund;P Metsch;M Kästner

  • XFEM modeling and homogenization of magnetoactive composites

    C. Spieler;M. Kästner;J. Goldmann;J. Brummund

  • Microscale modeling and simulation of magnetorheological elastomers at finite strains: A study on the influence of mechanical preloads

    Unknown

  • A Selection of Benchmark Problems in Solid Mechanics and Applied Mathematics

    Jörg Schröder;Thomas Wick;Stefanie Reese;Peter Wriggers

  • Multiscale XFEM‐modelling and simulation of the inelastic material behaviour of textile‐reinforced polymers

    Unknown

  • Isogeometric analysis of the Cahn-Hilliard equation - a convergence study

    Markus Kästner;Philipp Metsch;René de Borst

  • Projection and transfer operators in adaptive isogeometric analysis with hierarchical B-splines

    Unknown

  • Development of a quadratic finite element formulation based on the XFEM and NURBS

    Unknown

  • Overview of phase-field models for fatigue fracture in a unified framework

    Unknown

  • Simulation of self-piercing rivetting processes in fibre reinforced polymers: Material modelling and parameter identification

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

René de Borst
René de Borst University of Sheffield
Dominik Schillinger
Dominik Schillinger University of Minnesota
Andreas Menzel
Andreas Menzel TU Dortmund University
Alessandro Reali
Alessandro Reali University of Pavia
Ferdinando Auricchio
Ferdinando Auricchio University of Pavia
Luca Susmel
Luca Susmel University of Sheffield
Filippo Berto
Filippo Berto Sapienza University of Rome
Nikhilesh Chawla
Nikhilesh Chawla Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in exploring alternatives to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, online degrees in fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) offer flexible and career-focused options. Understanding the slp acceptance rate is crucial for prospective applicants as it highlights the competitiveness of these programs and helps set realistic expectations.

Many wonder, can you get a speech pathology degree online? The answer is yes, and online degrees provide an accessible path for working professionals and remote learners to enter this growing field. However, the choice of program requires careful consideration to ensure accreditation and quality.

Cost is another important factor when selecting an online degree. Resources outlining online speech pathology school cost offer valuable insights on tuition, fees, and potential financial aid options, helping students budget appropriately for their education.

Veterans seeking to further their education should consider the best online speech pathology degree programs for veterans, which often provide tailored support services and benefits that recognize military experience while easing the transition into civilian careers.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Kästner

Recently Published Articles