World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 50 4126 3963 274 256 256 8497

Luca Susmel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luca Susmel between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luca Susmel published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2020. 17 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2020. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
2001 2025

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luca Susmel: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 5
2004 3
2005 2
2006 9
2007 9
2008 17
2009 20
2010 10
2011 11
2012 7
2013 13
2014 14
2015 12
2016 19
2017 14
2018 19
2019 12
2020 23
2021 9
2022 17
2023 15
2024 11
2025 6
Total 280
Download as CSV

Luca Susmel publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Susmel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 256 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 256
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Luca Susmel D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luca Susmel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210 50
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Luca Susmel is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom and focuses their research on engineering, particularly in the mechanics of materials and mechanical engineering fields. Their work extensively covers fatigue and fracture mechanics, as well as additive manufacturing and 3D printing technologies.

The core areas of study in their research include:

  • Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Additive manufacturing and 3D printing technologies
  • Additive manufacturing materials and processes
  • Structural load-bearing analysis
  • Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
  • Welding techniques and residual stresses
  • Manufacturing process and optimization

Susmel's recent publications reflect these interests and include the following papers:

  • Fatigue testing and analysis of steel plates manufactured by wire-arc directed energy deposition, 2023, Additive Manufacturing
  • On the notch fatigue strength of additively manufactured polylactide (PLA), 2020, International Journal of Fatigue
  • Notch static strength of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), 2020, Additive Manufacturing
  • Fused Filament Fabrication-4D-Printed Shape Memory Polymers: A Review, 2021, Polymers
  • Evaluation of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria under proportional loading for S355 steel, 2020, Engineering Failure Analysis

Their frequent co-authors include the following researchers:

  • Filippo Berto
  • Piao Li
  • Chin Tze Ng
  • Naimah Asid Alanazi
  • Edward John

Susmel often publishes in several key venues related to materials and structural engineering, including:

  • International Journal of Fatigue
  • Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
  • Procedia Structural Integrity
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Engineering Failure Analysis

Their subfields of study extend into:

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry

Luca Susmel's research contributes to the understanding of material behavior under fatigue and static conditions, notably within additive manufacturing contexts. Their publications provide data on structural integrity and mechanical properties that are relevant for engineering applications involving novel manufacturing processes and material optimization.

Best Publications

  • The theory of critical distances: a review of its applications in fatigue☆

    Luca Susmel;Luca Susmel

  • A bi-parametric Wöhler curve for high cycle multiaxial fatigue assessment

    L Susmel;Paolo Lazzarin

  • A novel formulation of the theory of critical distances to estimate lifetime of notched components in the medium-cycle fatigue regime

    L. Susmel;L. Susmel;D. Taylor

  • Fatigue behaviour and life assessment of composite laminates under multiaxial loadings

    Marino Quaresimin;Luca Susmel;Ramesh Talreja

  • The theory of critical distances to predict static strength of notched brittle components subjected to mixed-mode loading

    Luca Susmel;Luca Susmel;D. Taylor

  • Multiaxial Notch Fatigue

    Luca Susmel

  • On the use of the Theory of Critical Distances to predict static failures in ductile metallic materials containing different geometrical features

    L. Susmel;L. Susmel;D. Taylor

  • The mean stress effect on the high-cycle fatigue strength from a multiaxial fatigue point of view

    L. Susmel;R. Tovo;P. Lazzarin

  • A critical distance/plane method to estimate finite life of notched components under variable amplitude uniaxial/multiaxial fatigue loading

    Luca Susmel;David Taylor

  • A stress‐based method to predict lifetime under multiaxial fatigue loadings

    P. Lazzarin;L. Susmel

  • An Elasto-Plastic Reformulation of the Theory of Critical Distances to Estimate Lifetime of Notched Components Failing in the Low/Medium-Cycle Fatigue Regime

    Luca Susmel;David Taylor

  • A simple and efficient numerical algorithm to determine the orientation of the critical plane in multiaxial fatigue problems

    Luca Susmel

  • A unifying approach to estimate the high‐cycle fatigue strength of notched components subjected to both uniaxial and multiaxial cyclic loadings

    L. Susmel

  • On the use of the Theory of Critical Distances and the Modified Wöhler Curve Method to estimate fretting fatigue strength of cylindrical contacts

    J.A. Araújo;L. Susmel;L. Susmel;D. Taylor;J.C.T. Ferro

  • Multiaxial notch fatigue : from nominal to local stress/strain quantities

    Luca Susmel

  • Two methods for predicting the multiaxial fatigue limits of sharp notches

    Luca Susmel;D. Taylor

  • Fatigue design in the presence of stress concentrations

    L Susmel;D Taylor

  • Modified Wöhler curve method, theory of critical distances and Eurocode 3: A novel engineering procedure to predict the lifetime of steel welded joints subjected to both uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue loading

    L. Susmel

  • The Theory of Critical Distances as an alternative experimental strategy for the determination of KIc and ΔKth

    Luca Susmel;David Taylor

  • The Modified Wöhler Curve Method applied along with the Theory of Critical Distances to estimate finite life of notched components subjected to complex multiaxial loading paths

    L. Susmel;L. Susmel;D. Taylor

  • The Theory of Critical Distances to estimate lifetime of notched components subjected to variable amplitude uniaxial fatigue loading

    Luca Susmel;Luca Susmel;David Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Harm Askes
Harm Askes Maastricht University
M.N. James
M.N. James Plymouth University
Filippo Berto
Filippo Berto Sapienza University of Rome
Youshi Hong
Youshi Hong Chinese Academy of Sciences
Giovanni Meneghetti
Giovanni Meneghetti University of Padua
Andrea Carpinteri
Andrea Carpinteri University of Parma
Marino Quaresimin
Marino Quaresimin University of Padua
Paolo Lazzarin
Paolo Lazzarin University of Padua
José A.F.O. Correia
José A.F.O. Correia University of Porto
Joby Boxall
Joby Boxall University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Luca Susmel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles