World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marino Quaresimin

Marino Quaresimin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 47 1393 1286 30 29 192 6994

Marino Quaresimin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marino Quaresimin between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marino Quaresimin published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 13 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 7 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marino Quaresimin: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 7
2002 2
2003 3
2004 0
2005 3
2006 9
2007 0
2008 6
2009 0
2010 14
2011 13
2012 11
2013 16
2014 14
2015 18
2016 18
2017 14
2018 12
2019 5
2020 2
2021 15
2022 6
2023 5
2024 6
2025 12
2026 1
Total 216
Download as CSV

Marino Quaresimin publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marino Quaresimin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 192 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140 192
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Marino Quaresimin D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marino Quaresimin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70 47
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Marino Quaresimin is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Materials Science, with notable focus areas including the mechanics of materials, polymers and plastics, mechanical engineering, civil and structural engineering, and pollution.

The scientist's work covers several subfields and specific topics of study. These include:

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Pollution

Marino Quaresimin concentrates on research themes such as:

  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Textile Materials and Evaluations
  • Smart Materials for Construction
  • Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Composite Material Mechanics

Their publication history includes papers covering various aspects of composite materials and structures, fatigue damage, energy absorption, and nanomodification of epoxy resins. Some recent papers are:

  • Energy-absorption characteristics of tube-reinforced absorbent honeycomb sandwich structure (2020), published in Composite Structures
  • Compressive response and energy absorption of all-composite sandwich panels with channel cores (2022), published in Composite Structures
  • Improving the Antimicrobial and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resins via Nanomodification: An Overview (2021), published in Molecules
  • Effect of fibre waviness on the compressive fatigue behavior of woven carbon/epoxy laminates (2020), published in Composites Part B Engineering
  • Fatigue damage evolution in woven composites with different architectures (2022), published in International Journal of Fatigue

Marino Quaresimin frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Paolo Andrea Carraro
  • L. Maragoni
  • Michele Zappalorto
  • Alessandro Pontefisso
  • Mirko Simonetto

Their work appears consistently in specialized publication venues with multiple contributions to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Composites Science and Technology
  • Composite Structures
  • Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing
  • Composites Part B Engineering

Best Publications

  • Glass-fibre-reinforced composites with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties – Benefits and limitations of a nanoparticle modified matrix

    Malte H.G. Wichmann;Jan Sumfleth;Florian H. Gojny;Marino Quaresimin

  • Fatigue behaviour and life assessment of composite laminates under multiaxial loadings

    Marino Quaresimin;Luca Susmel;Ramesh Talreja

  • Toughening mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites: From experiments to modelling

    M. Quaresimin;K. Schulte;M. Zappalorto;S. Chandrasekaran

  • Fatigue behaviour and damage evolution of single lap bonded joints in composite material

    M. Quaresimin;M. Ricotta

  • Influence of temperature and thickness on the off-axis behaviour of short glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6.6 – cyclic loading

    M. De Monte;E. Moosbrugger;M. Quaresimin

  • Multifunctional Cu2+-montmorillonite/epoxy resin nanocomposites with antibacterial activity

    Alessandra Bartolozzi;Roberta Bertani;Elisa Burigo;Alberto Fabrizi

  • Multi-axial fatigue behaviour of a severely notched carbon steel

    B. Atzori;F. Berto;P. Lazzarin;M. Quaresimin

  • Energy absorption in composite laminates under impact loading

    Marino Quaresimin;Mauro Ricotta;Livio Martello;Stefano Mian

  • Damage initiation and evolution in glass/epoxy tubes subjected to combined tension–torsion fatigue loading

    M. Quaresimin;P.A. Carraro

  • Influence of the interphase zone on the nanoparticle debonding stress

    Michele Zappalorto;Marco Salviato;Marino Quaresimin

  • Fatigue behaviour of glass/epoxy laminates in the presence of voids

    L. Maragoni;P.A. Carraro;M. Peron;M. Quaresimin

  • Stress intensity factors and strain energy release rates in single lap bonded joints in composite materials

    M. Quaresimin;M. Ricotta

  • Life prediction of bonded joints in composite materials

    M. Quaresimin;M. Ricotta

  • A stiffness degradation model for cracked multidirectional laminates with cracks in multiple layers

    P.A. Carraro;M. Quaresimin

  • Understanding the effect of nano-modifier addition upon the properties of fibre reinforced laminates

    Marino Quaresimin;Russell J. Varley

  • Damage evolution under cyclic multiaxial stress state: A comparative analysis between glass/epoxy laminates and tubes

    Marino Quaresimin;P.A. Carraro;L.P. Mikkelsen;N. Lucato

  • A multiscale model to describe nanocomposite fracture toughness enhancement by the plastic yielding of nanovoids

    Michele Zappalorto;Marco Salviato;Marino Quaresimin

  • Influence of temperature and thickness on the off-axis behaviour of short glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6.6 – Quasi-static loading

    Unknown

  • A damage based model for crack initiation in unidirectional composites under multiaxial cyclic loading

    P.A. Carraro;M. Quaresimin

  • Plastic shear bands and fracture toughness improvements of nanoparticle filled polymers: A multiscale analytical model

    Marco Salviato;Michele Zappalorto;Marino Quaresimin

  • Numerical evaluation of aerodynamic and inertial contributions to Darrieus wind turbine blade deformation

    Marco Raciti Castelli;Andrea Dal Monte;Marino Quaresimin;Ernesto Benini

  • Fracture behaviour of fumed silica/epoxy nanocomposites

    M. Battistella;M. Cascione;B. Fiedler;M.H.G. Wichmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Michele Zappalorto
Michele Zappalorto University of Padua
Giovanni Meneghetti
Giovanni Meneghetti University of Padua
Paolo Lazzarin
Paolo Lazzarin University of Padua
Giulio Di Toro
Giulio Di Toro University of Padua
Ramesh Talreja
Ramesh Talreja Texas A&M University
Karl Schulte
Karl Schulte Hamburg University of Technology
Ole Thybo Thomsen
Ole Thybo Thomsen University of Bristol
Luca Susmel
Luca Susmel University of Sheffield
Lazaros Tzounis
Lazaros Tzounis Hellenic Mediterranean University
Philip J. Withers
Philip J. Withers University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to numerous related fields and online degree programs. For students balancing work, family, or military commitments, finding a military friendly online speech pathology degree programs can provide flexible options to advance education without sacrificing other responsibilities.

Cost is another important factor. Many prospective students research online speech pathology school cost to budget effectively. Understanding tuition and fees in related disciplines can help plan investments wisely while pursuing a broader set of skills relevant to engineering careers that require communication expertise.

For those eager to accelerate their studies, fast track speech pathology programs offer condensed paths that balance speed with quality education. These programs may inspire similar approaches in engineering education for motivated learners.

Finally, interdisciplinary careers such as criminal profiling within the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit blend analytical and technical skills. Learning more about how to become an FBI behavioral analysis unit profiler can provide insight into unique career paths where the problem-solving mindset of engineers is highly valued.

Best Scientists Citing Marino Quaresimin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles