World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giovanni Meneghetti

Giovanni Meneghetti

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
38
Citations
5115
World Ranking
2300
National Ranking
83

Giovanni Meneghetti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Meneghetti sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 286 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Giovanni Meneghetti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Meneghetti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giovanni Meneghetti is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and specializes in the field of engineering, with a focus on mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, and civil and structural engineering. Their research covers a range of topics including fatigue and fracture mechanics, structural load-bearing analysis, mechanical stress and fatigue analysis, additive manufacturing materials and processes, welding techniques and residual stresses, and engineering structural analysis methods.

Notable recent publications by Giovanni Meneghetti include:

  • State-of-the-art review of peak stress method for fatigue strength assessment of welded joints, 2020, International Journal of Fatigue
  • Rapid evaluation of notch stress intensity factors using the peak stress method with 3D tetrahedral finite element models: Comparison of commercial codes, 2022, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures

Other significant papers from their research network that relate to their fields of study are:

  • Damage tolerant design of additively manufactured metallic components subjected to cyclic loading: State of the art and challenges, 2021, Progress in Materials Science
  • Pure molybdenum manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Thermal and mechanical characterization at room and high temperature, 2021, Additive Manufacturing
  • An engineering estimation of fatigue thresholds from a microstructural size and Vickers hardness: application to wrought and additively manufactured metals, 2020, International Journal of Fatigue

Giovanni Meneghetti frequently collaborates with several co-authors, often working alongside Alberto Campagnolo, Mauro Ricotta, Daniele Rigon, Luca Vecchiato, and Alberto Visentin.

Their research contributions are frequently published in the following venues:

  • Procedia Structural Integrity
  • International Journal of Fatigue
  • Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
  • IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
  • Materials

The scientist's work is centrally positioned within engineering disciplines, largely revolving around the mechanics and analysis of materials and structures, with particular attention to additive manufacturing and fatigue processes.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of the fatigue strength of a stainless steel based on the energy dissipation

    G. Meneghetti

  • Fracture mechanics and notch sensitivity

    B. Atzori;P. Lazzarin;G. Meneghetti

  • Damage tolerant design of additively manufactured metallic components subjected to cyclic loading: State of the art and challenges.

    Uwe Zerbst;Giovanni Bruno;Jean-Yves Buffiere;Thomas Wegener

  • Fatigue crack initiation and propagation phases near notches in metals with low notch sensitivity

    P Lazzarin;R Tovo;G Meneghetti

  • Significance of the elastic peak stress evaluated by FE analyses at the point of singularity of sharp V-notched components

    G. Meneghetti;P. Lazzarin

  • An analysis of defects influence on axial fatigue strength of maraging steel specimens produced by additive manufacturing

    G. Meneghetti;D. Rigon;C. Gennari

  • Material fatigue properties for assessing mechanical components weakened by notches and defects

    B. Atzori;G. Meneghetti;L. Susmel

  • A unified treatment of the mode I fatigue limit of components containing notches or defects

    Bruno Atzori;Paolo Lazzarin;Giovanni Meneghetti

  • The use of the specific heat loss to analyse the low- and high-cycle fatigue behaviour of plain and notched specimens made of a stainless steel

    Giovanni Meneghetti;Mauro Ricotta

  • On fatigue limit in the presence of notches: classical vs. recent unified formulations

    Michele Ciavarella;Giovanni Meneghetti

  • Fatigue strength of fillet welded structural steels: finite elements, strain gauges and reality

    Bruno Atzori;Giovanni Meneghetti

  • The use of peak stresses for fatigue strength assessments of welded lap joints and cover plates with toe and root failures

    Giovanni Meneghetti

  • A synthesis of the push‐pull fatigue behaviour of plain and notched stainless steel specimens by using the specific heat loss

    G. Meneghetti;M. Ricotta;B. Atzori

  • Fatigue strength assessment of a short fiber composite based on the specific heat dissipation

    Giovanni Meneghetti;Marino Quaresimin

  • Structural Analysis of the Interior PM Rotor Considering Both Static and Fatigue Loading

    Massimo Barcaro;Giovanni Meneghetti;Nicola Bianchi

  • On the operation strategy of steam power plants working at variable load: Technical and economic issues

    Anna Stoppato;Alberto Mirandola;Giovanni Meneghetti;E. Lo Casto

  • State-of-the-art review of peak stress method for fatigue strength assessment of welded joints

    Giovanni Meneghetti;Alberto Campagnolo

  • The peak stress method to estimate the mode I notch stress intensity factor in welded joints using three-dimensional finite element models

    Giovanni Meneghetti;Carlo Guzzella

  • The Peak Stress Method for Fatigue Strength Assessment of welded joints with weld toe or weld root failures

    G. Meneghetti;P. Lazzarin

  • Influence of build orientation on static and axial fatigue properties of Maraging steel specimens produced by additive manufacturing

    Giovanni Meneghetti;Daniele Rigon;D. Cozzi;W. Waldhauser

  • Fatigue strength assessment of partial and full‐penetration steel and aluminium butt‐welded joints according to the peak stress method

    G. Meneghetti;A. Campagnolo;F. Berto

  • RAPID EVALUATION OF NOTCH STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS USING THE PEAK STRESS METHOD: COMPARISON OF COMMERCIAL FINITE ELEMENT CODES FOR A RANGE OF MESH PATTERNS

    G. Meneghetti;A. Campagnolo;M. Avalle;D. Castagnetti

  • The peak stress method applied to fatigue assessments of steel and aluminium fillet‐welded joints subjected to mode I loading

    Giovanni Meneghetti

  • Comparison of Experimental Thermal Methods for the Fatigue Limit Evaluation of a Stainless Steel

    Mauro Ricotta;Giovanni Meneghetti;Bruno Atzori;Giacomo Risitano

  • Evaluating the heat energy dissipated in a small volume surrounding the tip of a fatigue crack

    G. Meneghetti;M. Ricotta

Frequent Co-Authors

Filippo Berto
Filippo Berto Sapienza University of Rome
Paolo Lazzarin
Paolo Lazzarin University of Padua
Paolo Colombo
Paolo Colombo University of Padua
Marino Quaresimin
Marino Quaresimin University of Padua
Luca Susmel
Luca Susmel University of Sheffield
Michele Zappalorto
Michele Zappalorto University of Padua
Nicola Bianchi
Nicola Bianchi University of Padua
Andrea Spagnoli
Andrea Spagnoli University of Parma
Jean-Yves Buffiere
Jean-Yves Buffiere Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Thomas Niendorf
Thomas Niendorf University of Kassel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Fields like speech pathology offer specialized paths, with options such as military friendly online speech pathology degree programs designed to accommodate veterans transitioning into civilian careers.

Many professionals value flexibility, which is why accelerated slp programs are increasingly popular. These programs allow learners to complete their studies faster and enter the workforce sooner, making them ideal for those eager to advance quickly.

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering graduates also consider careers requiring analytical skills similar to engineering, such as criminal profiling. Understanding the criminal profiler salary and job outlook can help assess the viability of this less traditional pathway.

Additionally, exploring different types of counseling degrees may appeal to those interested in shifting toward human-centered professions. These degrees provide options to support mental health and wellness within technical industries or beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Giovanni Meneghetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles