World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 92 161 145 117 103 330 37569

Mark P. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark P. Taylor between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark P. Taylor published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2003. 17 of the 363 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2003. 1986: 3 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 19 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

363 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark P. Taylor: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 3
1987 10
1988 10
1989 18
1990 13
1991 13
1992 19
1993 14
1994 6
1995 4
1996 3
1997 13
1998 11
1999 11
2000 7
2001 14
2002 13
2003 23
2004 14
2005 2
2006 8
2007 12
2008 10
2009 18
2010 7
2011 12
2012 6
2013 8
2014 7
2015 4
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
2020 6
2021 9
2022 9
2023 2
2024 13
2025 4
Total 363
Download as CSV

Mark P. Taylor publications per year - data summary

  • Mark P. Taylor, a Economics and Finance scholar from Washington University in St. Louis, has 363 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2003, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2017 and 2018, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 9.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.1 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 37 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 148 publications (10.6 per year); 2000-2013: 154 publications (11.0 per year); 2014-2025: 61 publications (5.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Mark P. Taylor publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 327–331 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 330 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25 330
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Mark P. Taylor publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Mark P. Taylor, a Economics and Finance scholar from Washington University in St. Louis, records 330 publications - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mark P. Taylor, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Mark P. Taylor ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mark P. Taylor D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark P. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8 92
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark P. Taylor D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Mark P. Taylor, a Economics and Finance scholar from Washington University in St. Louis, records 92 D-Index - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Mark P. Taylor, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Mark P. Taylor ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Economics and Finance in United States Leader Award

Overview

Mark P. Taylor is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their scholarly work spans several fields with a focus on social sciences, particularly in political science and international relations. The scientist's research contributions intersect with biophysics, computer networks and communications, atomic and molecular physics and optics, as well as management science and operations research.

Their primary topics of investigation include international law and human rights, global peace and security dynamics, digital holography and microscopy, cell image analysis techniques, advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques, advanced database systems and queries, and data quality and management.

Mark P. Taylor has published in multiple venues, with a notable publishing record in arXiv (Cornell University), where three papers appear. Other publication venues include Scientific Reports, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

The scientist's recent papers cover a range of topics from microscopy to visualization and education in the field of research data. These include:

  • "Quantitative phase microscopy for non-invasive live cell population monitoring," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Spreading the word -- current status of VO tutorials and schools," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "TOPCAT Visualisation over the Web," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Contents list," 2023, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
  • "TOPCAT Corner Plot," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Research collaborations have been consistent, with frequent coauthors including M. Brescia, S. Andreon, L. Conversi, F. Courbin, and M. Cropper, each having contributed to two joint publications.

  • M. Brescia
  • S. Andreon
  • L. Conversi
  • F. Courbin
  • M. Cropper

Mark P. Taylor's body of work engages with interdisciplinary fields, linking computational methods and physical sciences to broader social scientific themes. This diversity in research reflects the scientist's integration of both quantitative and qualitative approaches across different domains.

Best Publications

  • THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY DEBATE

    Alan M. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor

  • The use of technical analysis in the foreign exchange market

    Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor;Helen Allen

  • The Economics of Exchange Rates

    Lucio Sarno;Mark P. Taylor;Jeffery A. Frankel

  • Nonlinear Mean‐Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Toward a Solution To the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzles

    Mark P. Taylor;David A. Peel;Lucio Sarno

  • Real Exchange Rate Behavior: The Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries

    James R. Lothian;Mark P. Taylor

  • The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period

    Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor;Lucio Sarno

  • Official Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market: Is It Effective and, If So, How Does It Work?

    Lucio Sarno;Mark P. Taylor

  • Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates

    Lutz Kilian;Lutz Kilian;Lutz Kilian;Mark Peter Taylor;Mark Peter Taylor

  • Exchange Rate Economics: A Survey

    Ronald MacDonald;Mark P. Taylor

  • Applied econometric techniques

    Keith Cuthbertson;Keith Cuthbertson;Stephen G. Hall;Mark P. Taylor

  • The Crisis in the Foreign Exchange Market

    Michael Melvin;Mark P Taylor

  • Purchasing Power Parity and the Real Exchange Rate

    Lucio Sarno;Mark Taylor

  • Charts, Noise and Fundamentals in the London Foreign Exchange Market

    Helen Allen;Mark P. Taylor

  • Nonlinear adjustment, long-run equilibrium and exchange rate fundamentals

    Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor;David A. Peel

  • An empirical examination of long-run purchasing power parity using cointegration techniques

    Mark P. Taylor

  • The obstinate passion of foreign exchange professionals: Technical analysis

    Lukas Menkhoff;Mark P. Taylor

  • Capital Flows to Developing Countries: Long- and Short-Term Determinants

    Mark P. Taylor;Lucio Sarno

  • The Internationalisation of Stock Markets and the Abolition of U.K. Exchange Control

    Mark P. Taylor;Ian Tonks

  • The monetary model of the exchange rate: long-run relationships, short-run dynamics and how to beat a random walk

    Ronald MacDonald;Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor

  • EARNINGS, INDEPENDENCE OR UNEMPLOYMENT: WHY BECOME SELF‐EMPLOYED?

    Unknown

  • Why is it so Difficult to Beat the Random Walk Rorecast of Exchange Rates

    Lutz Kilian;Lutz Kilian;Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor;Mark P. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucio Sarno
Lucio Sarno University of Cambridge
N. Gregory Mankiw
N. Gregory Mankiw Harvard University
Ronald MacDonald
Ronald MacDonald University of Glasgow
Richard H. Clarida
Richard H. Clarida Columbia University
Paul R. Masson
Paul R. Masson University of Toronto
Ashoka Mody
Ashoka Mody Princeton University
Michael Melvin
Michael Melvin University of California, San Diego
Lutz Kilian
Lutz Kilian Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Stephen P. Jenkins
Stephen P. Jenkins London School of Economics and Political Science
Michael J. Artis
Michael J. Artis University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Economics and Finance opens doors to many flexible online educational options. Busy professionals or students looking to fast-track their progress may benefit from a 6 month mba program. These programs are ideal if you want to gain advanced business and finance skills quickly.

For those starting their journey or aiming to specialize, a bookkeeper certification online is a practical step. This certification can equip you with essential accounting and financial management skills valued by employers.

If you want broader administrative skills, consider exploring online associate degrees in office administration. These programs cover core business operations, supporting a diverse range of finance-related roles.

Career advancement also often calls for specialization. A master of human resource management online can complement your economics or finance background, preparing you for leadership positions in people-driven organizations.

Whether you are seeking entry-level qualifications or aiming for executive roles, these related online degrees and certifications can be tailored to fit your unique career goals in the Economics and Finance fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mark P. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles