World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
62
Citations
19175
World Ranking
1249
National Ranking
578

Lyn Frazier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Frazier sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lyn Frazier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Frazier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lyn Frazier is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research spans both Arts and Humanities as well as Psychology, with a total of seven publications in each field. Their work situates primarily within the subfields of Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in their research include Syntax, Semantics, and Linguistic Variation; Language, Metaphor, and Cognition; Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies; Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism; Categorization, Perception, and Language; Multisensory Perception and Integration; and Language Development and Disorders.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Charles Clifton
  • Barbara Kaup
  • Oksana Tsaregorodtseva
  • Britta Stolterfoht
  • Alexander Göbel

They have published in several academic venues, notably:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Language and Speech
  • Syntax

Recent publications by Lyn Frazier include:

  • "Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents," 2021, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
  • "Do linguistic stimuli activate experiential colour traces related to the entities they refer to and, if so, under what circumstances?" 2023, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • "Tense and Discourse Structure: The Timeline Hypothesis," 2021, Discourse Processes
  • "Domain Restriction in Generic Statements," 2020, Discourse Processes
  • "Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing English As-Clauses," 2021, Language and Speech

Best Publications

  • Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences

    Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model.

    Lyn Frazier;Janet Dean Fodor

  • ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES.

    Lyn Frazier

  • The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences

    Keith Rayner;Marcia Carlson;Lyn Frazier

  • Sentence processing: A tutorial review.

    Lyn Frazier

  • Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch

    Lyn Frazier

  • Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension

    Lyn Frazier;Katy Carlson;Charles Clifton

  • Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch

    Lyn Frazier;Lyn Frazier;Giovanni B Flores d'Arcais;Giovanni B Flores d'Arcais

  • Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier

  • Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆

    Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser

    Lyn Frazier;Charles Clifton

  • Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension☆

    Lyn Frazier;Charles Clifton;Janet Randall

  • Perspectives on sentence processing

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Null vs. overt pronouns and the Topic-Focus articulation in Spanish: 2704

    Lyn Frazier;Luis Alonso-Ovalle;Susana Fernández-Solera

  • Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words

    Keith Rayner;Lyn Frazier

  • Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment

    Katy Carlson;Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier

  • Lexical Expectations in Sentence Comprehension.

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier;Cynthia Connine

  • Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs

    Elizabeth Gilboy;Josep-MMaria Sopena;Charles Cliftrn;Lyn Frazier

  • Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements

    Masako Hirotani;Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Parallel structure: a source of facilitation in sentence comprehension.

    Lyn Frazier;Lori Taft;Tom Roeper;Charles Clifton

  • Language Processing and Language Acquisition

    Lyn Frazier;Jill G. De Villiers

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Clifton
Charles Clifton University of Massachusetts Amherst
Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Matthew J. Traxler
Matthew J. Traxler University of California, Davis
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Fernanda Ferreira
Fernanda Ferreira University of California, Davis
Renée Baillargeon
Renée Baillargeon University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Christopher Potts
Christopher Potts Stanford University
Patrick J. McNamara
Patrick J. McNamara University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. With the rise of online education, students can now access flexible and affordable degree options that fit their schedules and budgets. Many universities offer remote programs designed to help you advance quickly in your field.

For those interested in social work, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest msw programs online to minimize debt while preparing for impactful roles. If you're aiming for managerial or therapy-related careers, an accelerated masters in social work can fast-track your journey.

Students passionate about behavior analysis may pursue bcba school online to become board-certified behavior analysts, a sought-after credential in education and healthcare.

Finally, for a quick entry into the field of psychology, there are programs catering to those eager to graduate faster—such as the quickest psychology degree options online. These flexible pathways can help you achieve your career goals on your own timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Lyn Frazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles