World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 62 1249 1104 578 502 154 19175

Lyn Frazier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lyn Frazier between 1978 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lyn Frazier published across 46 years, from 1978 to 2023, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 2 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications
1978 2023

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lyn Frazier: publications per year, 1978 to 2023
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 0
1982 1
1983 5
1984 4
1985 2
1986 2
1987 6
1988 1
1989 5
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 0
1995 6
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 9
2000 4
2001 3
2002 6
2003 0
2004 2
2005 6
2006 11
2007 3
2008 6
2009 3
2010 2
2011 1
2012 7
2013 7
2014 4
2015 10
2016 2
2017 2
2018 8
2019 3
2020 1
2021 3
2022 0
2023 2
Total 160
Download as CSV

Lyn Frazier publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Frazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 154
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lyn Frazier D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn Frazier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94 62
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Lyn Frazier is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research spans both Arts and Humanities as well as Psychology, with a total of seven publications in each field. Their work situates primarily within the subfields of Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in their research include Syntax, Semantics, and Linguistic Variation; Language, Metaphor, and Cognition; Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies; Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism; Categorization, Perception, and Language; Multisensory Perception and Integration; and Language Development and Disorders.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Charles Clifton
  • Barbara Kaup
  • Oksana Tsaregorodtseva
  • Britta Stolterfoht
  • Alexander Göbel

They have published in several academic venues, notably:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Language and Speech
  • Syntax

Recent publications by Lyn Frazier include:

  • "Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents," 2021, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
  • "Do linguistic stimuli activate experiential colour traces related to the entities they refer to and, if so, under what circumstances?" 2023, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • "Tense and Discourse Structure: The Timeline Hypothesis," 2021, Discourse Processes
  • "Domain Restriction in Generic Statements," 2020, Discourse Processes
  • "Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing English As-Clauses," 2021, Language and Speech

Best Publications

  • Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences

    Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model.

    Lyn Frazier;Janet Dean Fodor

  • ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES.

    Lyn Frazier

  • The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences

    Keith Rayner;Marcia Carlson;Lyn Frazier

  • Sentence processing: A tutorial review.

    Lyn Frazier

  • Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch

    Lyn Frazier

  • Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension

    Lyn Frazier;Katy Carlson;Charles Clifton

  • Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch

    Lyn Frazier;Lyn Frazier;Giovanni B Flores d'Arcais;Giovanni B Flores d'Arcais

  • Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier

  • Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆

    Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser

    Lyn Frazier;Charles Clifton

  • Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension☆

    Lyn Frazier;Charles Clifton;Janet Randall

  • Perspectives on sentence processing

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Null vs. overt pronouns and the Topic-Focus articulation in Spanish: 2704

    Lyn Frazier;Luis Alonso-Ovalle;Susana Fernández-Solera

  • Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words

    Keith Rayner;Lyn Frazier

  • Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment

    Katy Carlson;Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier

  • Lexical Expectations in Sentence Comprehension.

    Charles Clifton;Lyn Frazier;Cynthia Connine

  • Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs

    Elizabeth Gilboy;Josep-MMaria Sopena;Charles Cliftrn;Lyn Frazier

  • Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements

    Masako Hirotani;Lyn Frazier;Keith Rayner

  • Parallel structure: a source of facilitation in sentence comprehension.

    Lyn Frazier;Lori Taft;Tom Roeper;Charles Clifton

  • Language Processing and Language Acquisition

    Lyn Frazier;Jill G. De Villiers

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Clifton
Charles Clifton University of Massachusetts Amherst
Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Matthew J. Traxler
Matthew J. Traxler University of California, Davis
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Fernanda Ferreira
Fernanda Ferreira University of California, Davis
Renée Baillargeon
Renée Baillargeon University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Christopher Potts
Christopher Potts Stanford University
Patrick J. McNamara
Patrick J. McNamara University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. With the rise of online education, students can now access flexible and affordable degree options that fit their schedules and budgets. Many universities offer remote programs designed to help you advance quickly in your field.

For those interested in social work, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest msw programs online to minimize debt while preparing for impactful roles. If you're aiming for managerial or therapy-related careers, an accelerated masters in social work can fast-track your journey.

Students passionate about behavior analysis may pursue bcba school online to become board-certified behavior analysts, a sought-after credential in education and healthcare.

Finally, for a quick entry into the field of psychology, there are programs catering to those eager to graduate faster—such as the quickest psychology degree options online. These flexible pathways can help you achieve your career goals on your own timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Lyn Frazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles