World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5685 5280 3086 2796 82 9508

Matthew J. Traxler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Traxler between 1992 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Traxler published across 33 years, from 1992 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 4 of the 90 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2000. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication
1992 2024

90 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Traxler: publications per year, 1992 to 2024
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 1
2000 10
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 2
2010 1
2011 1
2012 3
2013 1
2014 5
2015 5
2016 2
2017 6
2018 2
2019 3
2020 1
2021 4
2022 0
2023 3
2024 1
Total 90
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Traxler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Traxler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 82
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Traxler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Traxler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew J. Traxler is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. Their work also spans general health professions, human-computer interaction, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The main topics covered in Traxler's research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Language Development and Disorders

Traxler has published numerous papers, several of which appear in prominent venues such as Applied Psycholinguistics and Bilingualism Language and Cognition. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Decoding semantic relatedness and prediction from EEG: A classification method comparison," 2023, NeuroImage
  • "Predictors of reading comprehension in deaf and hearing bilinguals," 2021, Applied Psycholinguistics
  • "Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension," 2021, Brain Research
  • "Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution," 2021, Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • "Word skipping in deaf and hearing bilinguals: Cognitive control over eye movements remains with increased perceptual span," 2021, Applied Psycholinguistics

Frequent co-authors in Traxler's work include Tamara Y. Swaab, David P. Corina, Liv J. Hoversten, Deborah Cates, and Trevor Brothers. The recurrent collaboration with these researchers reflects a focus on interdisciplinary efforts within language, cognition, and neuropsychology.

Traxler's work has been published across various venues, with a notable frequency in:

  • Applied Psycholinguistics
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain Research
  • Family Medicine

This body of research demonstrates a comprehensive approach to understanding language processing, bilingualism, hearing impairment, and cognitive control mechanisms. The exploration of neural and behavioral dimensions through EEG and brain-computer interface technologies is part of Traxler's contribution to cognitive neuroscience and psychology.

Best Publications

  • Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements

    Matthew J Traxler;Robin K Morris;Rachel E Seely

  • Plausibility and verb subcategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences : Evidence from self-paced reading

    Matthew J. Traxler

  • Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study

    Matthew J. Traxler;Martin J. Pickering

  • Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution

    Matthew J. Traxler;Matthew J. Traxler;Martin J. Pickering;Charles Clifton

  • Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study

    Martin J. Pickering;Matthew J. Traxler

  • Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses

    Matthew J. Traxler;Rihana S. Williams;Shelley A. Blozis;Robin K. Morris

  • Introduction to Psycholinguistics : Understanding Language Science

    Matthew J. Traxler

  • The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited

    Charles Clifton;Matthew J Traxler;Mohamed Taha Mohamed;Rihana S Williams

  • Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models

    Roger P.G. van Gompel;Martin J. Pickering;Matthew J. Traxler

  • Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts

    Martin J Pickering;Matthew J Traxler;Matthew W Crocker

  • Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading

    Matthew J. Traxler;Martin J. Pickering;Brian McElree

  • Influence of connectives on language comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation

    Matthew J. Traxler;Matthew J. Traxler;Michael D. Bybee;Martin J. Pickering

  • Syntactic Priming in Comprehension Evidence From Event-Related Potentials

    Kerry Ledoux;Matthew J. Traxler;Tamara Y. Swaab

  • Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review.

    Kristen M. Tooley;Matthew J. Traxler

  • Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

    Brian McElree;Matthew J Traxler;Martin J Pickering;Rachel E Seely

  • The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension

    Alan Garnham;Matthew Traxler;Jane Oakhill;Morton Ann Gernsbacher

  • Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion

    Martin J. Pickering;Brian McElree;Steven Frisson;Lillian Chen

  • Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence

    Tamara Y. Swaab;Matthew J. Traxler

  • Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension

    Tamara Y. Swaab;Matthew J. Traxler

  • Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements

    Matthew J. Traxler;Brian McElree;Rihana S. Williams;Martin J. Pickering

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Brian McElree
Brian McElree New York University
Roger P. G. van Gompel
Roger P. G. van Gompel University of Dundee
Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Morton Ann Gernsbacher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles Clifton
Charles Clifton University of Massachusetts Amherst
David P. Corina
David P. Corina University of California, Davis
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
John M. Henderson
John M. Henderson University of California, Davis
Robert J. Hartsuiker
Robert J. Hartsuiker Ghent University
Anthony J. Sanford
Anthony J. Sanford University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online in the USA offers flexible options tailored to diverse needs and career goals. Many students seek programs that allow them to balance work, family, and studies. For example, students in the Midwest may benefit from Wisconsin psychology programs online, which are designed for accessibility and convenience.

Speed matters to many learners, and several regions offer accelerated online pathways. For those interested in rapid completion, fastest online psychology degree programs in Arizona let students complete coursework in less time than traditional programs. Similarly, fastest online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida appeal to individuals eager to launch their psychology careers quickly.

Urban centers such as Houston also offer dynamic learning environments. The fastest online psychology bachelor's programs in Houston combine local perspectives with online flexibility, supporting students from various backgrounds.

Graduates from these online psychology degree programs are prepared for roles in counseling, research, human resources, and other fields, making online study a valuable pathway to diverse psychology careers in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Traxler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles