World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11481
World Ranking
5865
National Ranking
600

Anthony J. Sanford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony J. Sanford sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anthony J. Sanford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony J. Sanford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony J. Sanford is a researcher affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their work focuses primarily on the fields of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with substantial contributions in related subfields such as Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Gender Studies.

Their research explores a range of topics including Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Market Dynamics and Volatility, Stochastic Processes and Financial Applications, Monetary Policy and Economic Impact, Capital Investment and Risk Analysis, Risk and Portfolio Optimization, and Climate Change Policy and Economics.

Recent publications by Anthony J. Sanford include the following papers:

  • Investor reactions to board changes: does gender matter? (2023), Applied Economics Letters
  • Corporate investment and growth opportunities: The role of R&D-capital complementarity (2021), Journal of Corporate Finance
  • Optimized portfolio using a forward-looking expected tail loss (2021), Finance research letters
  • State price density estimation with an application to the recovery theorem (2021), Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics
  • Does Perception Matter in Asset Pricing? Modeling Volatility Jumps Using Twitter-Based Sentiment Indices (2020), Journal of Behavioral Finance

Their frequent coauthors have included Mu-Jeung Yang, Joannie Tremblay-Boire, Yue Ma, Nicolas Harvie, and Vincent Grégoire.

Among the venues where Sanford has published, the most frequent include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Corporate Finance
  • Finance research letters
  • Journal of Behavioral Finance
  • Applied Economics Letters

Sanford's work bridges theory and application, often addressing complex quantitative methods in financial economics, such as portfolio optimization, asset pricing models, and investment risk analysis. The interdisciplinary nature of their research is evident in associations with topics ranging from gender studies to climate change economics, highlighting an engagement with broad socio-economic aspects.

Best Publications

  • Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence

    Edward Finegan;Anthony J. Sanford;Simon C. Garrod

  • Perceiving affect from arm movement

    Frank E Pollick;Helena M Paterson;Armin Bruderlin;Anthony J Sanford

  • Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence

    Anthony J. Sanford;Patrick Sturt

  • The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text

    A. Anderson;S. C. Garrod;A. J. Sanford

  • Slow potential correlates of preparatory set

    N.E. Loveless;A.J. Sanford

  • Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading.

    Simon Garrod;Anthony Sanford

  • Mind, Brain and Narrative

    Anthony J. Sanford;Catherine Emmott

  • A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment

    Stephen B. Barton;Anthony J. Sanford

  • Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective

    Linda M. Moxey;Anthony J. Sanford

  • The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension.

    Anthony J. Sanford;Simon C. Garrod

  • Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding.

    Simon C. Garrod;Anthony J. Sanford

  • Linguistic Focus and Good-Enough Representations: An Application of the Change-Detection Paradigm

    Patrick Sturt;Anthony J. Sanford;Andrew Stewart;Eugene Dawydiak

  • THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES

    S.C. Garrod;A. J. Sanford

  • Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse

    Alison J. S. Sanford;Anthony J. Sanford;Jo Molle;Catherine Emmott

  • Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds : An eye-movement investigation

    Heather J. Ferguson;Anthony J. Sanford

  • Proper Names as Controllers of Discourse Focus

    A. J. Sanford;K. Moar;S. C. Garrod

  • Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives

    Linda M. Moxey;Anthony J. Sanford

  • Effects of Age on the Contingent Negative Variation and Preparatory Set in a Reaction-Time Task

    Norman E. Loveless;Anthony J. Sanford

  • The Time Course of the Influence of Implicit Causality Information: Focusing versus Integration Accounts

    Andrew J Stewart;Martin J Pickering;Anthony J Sanford

  • What, when, and how?: Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution

    A. J. Sanford;S. C. Garrod

  • Context, Attention and Depth of Processing During Interpretation

    Anthony J. Sanford

  • The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation.

    N.E. Loveless;A.J. Sanford

  • Shallow Processing and Underspecification

    Anthony J. Sanford;Arthur C. Graesser

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Garrod
Simon Garrod University of Glasgow
Hartmut Leuthold
Hartmut Leuthold University of Tübingen
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
Ruth Filik
Ruth Filik University of Nottingham
Christoph Scheepers
Christoph Scheepers University of Glasgow
Patrick Sturt
Patrick Sturt University of Edinburgh
Kevin B. Paterson
Kevin B. Paterson University of Leicester
Frank E. Pollick
Frank E. Pollick University of Glasgow
Matthew J. Traxler
Matthew J. Traxler University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens up a variety of online degrees and career opportunities across the United States. Many students choose online psychology programs for their flexibility and accessibility, especially if they are balancing work or family commitments. These programs often prepare graduates for roles in counseling, social services, research, and more.

If your goal is to become a professional counselor, it’s important to understand the fastest pathways available in your state. For example, some programs are tailored for those seeking Kansas fastest counseling programs, or you can research the fastest way to become a counselor in Kentucky. Similarly, there are options for those seeking the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Louisiana or hoping to discover the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Maine.

Career pathways can vary in length and requirements, so researching state-specific programs can help you meet licensure standards efficiently. Online psychology degrees often provide coursework that aligns with these requirements, helping students transition smoothly into their chosen careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony J. Sanford

Trending Scientists