World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8889
World Ranking
5710
National Ranking
587

Alan Garnham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Garnham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alan Garnham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Garnham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan Garnham is a researcher based at the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Psychology, Social Sciences, and Arts and Humanities. Within these broader disciplines, Garnham has contributed notably to subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Education, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research explores several main topics including Reading and Literacy Development, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, Gender Diversity and Inequality, and Social and Educational Sciences.

Garnham's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Integration: Key but Not So Simple, 2020, Discourse Processes
  • Opinion Piece: How People Structure Representations of Discourse, 2021, Dialogue & Discourse
  • The development of explicit occupational gender stereotypes in children: Comparing perceived gender ratios and competence beliefs, 2022, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Implicit consequentiality bias in English: A corpus of 300+ verbs, 2020, Behavior Research Methods
  • "This Is What a Mechanic Sounds Like": Children's Vocal Control Reveals Implicit Occupational Stereotypes, 2020, Psychological Science

Garnham publishes frequently in several academic venues, with multiple papers appearing in the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Other frequent venues include Discourse Processes, Dialogue & Discourse, Journal of Vocational Behavior, and Psychological Science.

The researcher has collaborated with several coauthors across their career, including Jane Oakhill, David Reby, Robin Banerjee, Valentina Cartei, and Scarlett Child.

Best Publications

  • Thinking and Reasoning

    Alan Garnham;Jane Oakhill

  • Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context

    Gerry T.M Altmann;Alan Garnham;Yvette Dennis

  • Becoming a skilled reader

    Jane Oakhill;Alan Garnham

  • How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding

    Ted Ruffman;Ted Ruffman;Lance Slade;Kate Rowlandson;Charlotte Rumsey

  • The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish

    Manuel Carreiras;Alan Garnham;Jane Oakhill;Kate Cain

  • Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora

    Alan Garnham

  • Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men

    Pascal Gygax;Ute Gabriel;Oriane Sarrasin;Jane Oakhill

  • Believability and syllogistic reasoning.

    Jane Oakhill;P.N. Johnson-Laird;Alan Garnham

  • Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation

    Alan Garnham;Richard C. Shillcock;Gordon D. A. Brown;Andrew I. D. Mill

  • Mental models as representations of discourse and text

    Alan Garnham

  • The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension

    Alan Garnham;Matthew Traxler;Jane Oakhill;Morton Ann Gernsbacher

  • Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse

    Alan Garnham;Jane Oakhill;P.N. Johnson-Laird

  • Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon

    Unknown

  • Mental models as representations of text

    Alan Garnham

  • Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information.

    Jane Oakhill;Alan Garnham;David Reynolds

  • The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task

    Naomi Jacobs;Alan Garnham

  • Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism.

    Don C. Mitchell;Martin M. B. Corley;Alan Garnham

  • Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German.

    Ute Gabriel;Pascal Gygax;Oriane Sarrasin;Alan Garnham

  • Psycholinguistics: Central Topics

    Alan Garnham

  • Late Closure in Context

    Gerry T.M. Altmann;Kathy Y. van Nice;Alan Garnham;Judith-Ann Henstra

  • Is logicist cognitive science possible

    Alan Garnham

  • Foundations of Cognitive Science: edited by Michael I. Posner, MIT Press, 1989. £40.50 (xiv + 888 pages) ISBN 0 262 16112 5

    Alan Garnham

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Oakhill
Jane Oakhill University of Sussex
Josef Perner
Josef Perner University of Salzburg
Gerry T. M. Altmann
Gerry T. M. Altmann University of Connecticut
Kate Cain
Kate Cain Lancaster University
Robin Banerjee
Robin Banerjee University of Sussex
Manuel Carreiras
Manuel Carreiras Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Philip N. Johnson-Laird Princeton University
Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Morton Ann Gernsbacher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Julia Simner
Julia Simner University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue online psychology degrees, which offer the flexibility to balance studies with personal and professional commitments. These programs also serve as a stepping stone for those aiming to become licensed counselors or therapists.

For example, the journey to becoming a licensed therapist in Jacksonville involves obtaining an accredited graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing national exams. Becoming a licensed therapist in Jersey City requires a similar process, with state-specific coursework and testing requirements.

Students interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Kansas City will find region-specific requirements, including state licensure applications. In addition, those looking to meet the licensed therapist requirements in Laredo need to navigate specialized standards for clinical hours and examinations.

Exploring related online degrees in psychology not only prepares graduates for these roles but also helps them understand the nuances of state-by-state licensing, setting a solid foundation for a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Garnham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles