World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Netherlands
2026
Award Badge
Psychology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
118
Citations
45504
World Ranking
280
National Ranking
8

Neuroscience

D-Index
118
Citations
45562
World Ranking
412
National Ranking
7

Peter Hagoort publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hagoort sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 743 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Hagoort D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hagoort sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2018 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2005 - Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council
  • 2004 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2003 - Dr Hendrik Muller Prize, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Peter Hagoort is affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in the Netherlands. Their research activities span multiple fields focused on language processing, cognitive neuroscience, and psychology, with a particular emphasis on the neurobiology of language and bilingualism.

The main fields of study for Peter Hagoort are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

The subfields include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Key topics of their work comprise:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Notable recent publications include:

  • "A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension" (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension" (2020), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension" (2021), Cerebral Cortex
  • "Word contexts enhance the neural representation of individual letters in early visual cortex" (2020), Nature Communications
  • "Real-time emotion generation in human-robot dialogue using large language models" (2023), Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Peter Hagoort frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Neurobiology of Language
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Cognition

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
  • Anne Kösem
  • Floris P. de Lange
  • Laura Giglio
  • Hartmut Fitz

Peter Hagoort has received several honors over their career:

  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2018)
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2012)
  • Spinoza Prize, Dutch Research Council (2005)
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (2004)
  • Dr Hendrik Muller Prize, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (2003)

Best Publications

  • On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework

    Peter Hagoort

  • Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension

    Peter Hagoort;Lea A. Hald;Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen;Karl Magnus Petersson

  • The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing

    Peter Hagoort;Colin M. Brown;Jolanda Groothusen

  • Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times

    Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Colin M. Brown;Pienie Zwitserlood;Valesca Kooijman

  • The processing nature of the n400: Evidence from masked priming

    Colin Brown;Peter Hagoort

  • Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400

    Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Peter Hagoort;Colin M. Brown

  • Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes

    Jason L Stein;Sarah E Medland;Sarah E Medland;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Alejandro Arias Vasquez;Derrek P Hibar

  • The neural integration of speaker and message

    Jos J. A. Van Berkum;Danielle van den Brink;Cathelijne M. J. Y. Tesink;Miriam Kos

  • Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations

    Peter Hagoort

  • The N400 as a function of the level of processing.

    Dorothee J. Chwilla;Colin M. Brown;Peter Hagoort

  • Neuronal Dynamics Underlying High- and Low-Frequency EEG Oscillations Contribute Independently to the Human BOLD Signal

    René Scheeringa;René Scheeringa;Pascal Fries;Pascal Fries;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld

  • MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond

    Peter Hagoort;Peter Hagoort

  • Frontal theta EEG activity correlates negatively with the default mode network in resting state.

    René Scheeringa;Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld

  • The Neurobiology of Language beyond Single Words

    Peter Hagoort;Peter Indefrey

  • When Language Meets Action: The Neural Integration of Gesture and Speech

    Roel M. Willems;Aslı Özyürek;Peter Hagoort

  • Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review

    Roel M. Willems;Peter Hagoort

  • The neurocognition of language

    Colin M. Brown;Peter Hagoort

  • How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing

    Peter Hagoort

  • Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance.

    René Scheeringa;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld;David G. Norris

  • The Neural Circuitry Involved in the Reading of German Words and Pseudowords: A PET Study

    Peter Hagoort;Peter Indefrey;Colin Brown;Hans Herzog

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve
Roel M. Willems
Roel M. Willems Radboud University
Colin M. Brown
Colin M. Brown Max Planck Society
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen Radboud University
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen Tilburg University
Ivan Toni
Ivan Toni Radboud University
Asli Ozyurek
Asli Ozyurek Max Planck Society
Jos J. A. Van Berkum
Jos J. A. Van Berkum Utrecht University
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA can open the door to a variety of rewarding careers, especially in growing fields such as speech-language pathology (SLP). Many students begin with a bachelor's degree in psychology before advancing to graduate studies. Online degrees are becoming increasingly popular, offering flexibility for students balancing work, family, and education.

If you're interested in pursuing a career as an SLP, it's important to understand the specific state requirements for licensure. For example, students wishing to learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Michigan must complete accredited graduate programs and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, slp requirements in Minnesota involve graduating from approved programs, passing the national SLP exam, and state-specific licensing steps.

Some states like Mississippi outline clear steps for how to become a speech language pathologist in Mississippi, emphasizing background checks and ongoing education, while Missouri slp certification requirements highlight clinical fellowships. Exploring these pathways can help you choose the best fit and prepare for a successful career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hagoort

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles