World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
28514
World Ranking
5422
National Ranking
158

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 181 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and works primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research focuses notably on Cognitive Neuroscience, with additional contributions to Developmental and Educational Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Frequent collaborators of Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen include:

  • Robert Oostenveld
  • Peter Hagoort
  • Joachim Groß
  • Britta U. Westner
  • Sophie Arana

Their research has been published extensively in several venues. The most common publication outlets are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Imaging Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Language

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen include:

  • "A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension" (2022) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective" (2021) published in NeuroImage
  • "Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research" (2020) published in Nature Neuroscience
  • "The frequency gradient of human resting-state brain oscillations follows cortical hierarchies" (2020) published in eLife
  • "A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction" (2021) published in NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data

    Robert Oostenveld;Pascal Fries;Eric Maris;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization

    Thilo Womelsdorf;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Wolf Singer;Wolf Singer

  • A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls

    André M. Bastos;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels

    André Moraes Bastos;André Moraes Bastos;André Moraes Bastos;Julien Vezoli;Conrado Arturo Bosman;Conrado Arturo Bosman;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity in the Alpha Band Predicts Visual Discrimination Ability

    Hanneke van Dijk;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Ole Jensen

  • Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG

    Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Joachim Gross

  • Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas.

    Conrado A. Bosman;Conrado A. Bosman;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Nicolas Brunet;Robert Oostenveld

  • Alpha-beta and gamma rhythms subserve feedback and feedforward influences among human visual cortical areas

    Georgios Michalareas;Julien Vezoli;Stan van Pelt;Stan van Pelt;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

    Joachim Gross;Sylvain Baillet;Gareth R. Barnes;Richard N. A. Henson

  • Neuronal coherence as a mechanism of effective corticospinal interaction

    Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Pascal Fries

  • Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space.

    Nienke Hoogenboom;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Jan Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Laura M. Parkes

  • Parieto-occipital sources account for the increase in alpha activity with working memory load.

    Anil M. Tuladhar;Niels ter Huurne;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Eric Maris

  • Nonparametric statistical testing of coherence differences

    Eric Maris;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Pascal Fries

  • Hippocampal-Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Support Memory Integration

    Alexander R. Backus;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Szabolcs Szebényi;Simon Hanslmayr

  • Ghost interactions in MEG/EEG source space: A note of caution on inter-areal coupling measures.

    J. Matias Palva;Sheng H. Wang;Satu Palva;Alexander Y. Zhigalov

  • The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective.

    Jennifer Stine Elam;Matthew F. Glasser;Michael P. Harms;Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos

  • Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG

    Arjen Stolk;Ana Todorovic;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld

  • Occipital Alpha Activity during Stimulus Processing Gates the Information Flow to Object-Selective Cortex

    Johanna M. Zumer;René Scheeringa;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;David G. Norris

  • Adding dynamics to the Human Connectome Project with MEG.

    L.J. Larson-Prior;Robert Oostenveld;S. Della Penna;G. Michalareas

  • Oscillatory Activity in Human Parietal and Occipital Cortex Shows Hemispheric Lateralization and Memory Effects in a Delayed Double-Step Saccade Task

    W. Pieter Medendorp;W. Pieter Medendorp;Geerten F.I. Kramer;Geerten F.I. Kramer;Ole Jensen;Robert Oostenveld

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Pascal Fries
Pascal Fries Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Joachim Gross
Joachim Gross University of Münster
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen Tilburg University
Herbert Schriefers
Herbert Schriefers Radboud University
Ardi Roelofs
Ardi Roelofs Radboud University
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Ivan Toni
Ivan Toni Radboud University
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles