World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2195 1999 1056 950 283 8737

Cristine D. Delnevo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cristine D. Delnevo between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cristine D. Delnevo published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2023. 44 of the 396 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2023. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 55 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

396 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cristine D. Delnevo: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 6
2004 12
2005 1
2006 5
2007 11
2008 5
2009 2
2010 4
2011 9
2012 3
2013 5
2014 14
2015 12
2016 27
2017 11
2018 10
2019 22
2020 24
2021 32
2022 37
2023 55
2024 37
2025 43
2026 1
Total 396
Download as CSV

Cristine D. Delnevo publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristine D. Delnevo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 274–283 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 283 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138 283
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Cristine D. Delnevo D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cristine D. Delnevo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Cristine D. Delnevo is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily centers on public health issues related to tobacco use, smoking behavior, and cessation. The body of work reflects significant activity in medicine with a focus on physiology, public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, general health professions, and sociology and political science.

Their research covers a range of topics including smoking behavior and cessation, behavioral health and interventions, obesity, physical activity and diet, consumer attitudes and food labeling, air quality and health impacts, global public health policies and epidemiology, and food security and health in diverse populations.

Recent publications by Cristine D. Delnevo include:

  • Rapid proliferation of illegal pod-mod disposable e-cigarettes, 2020, Tobacco Control
  • Examining Market Trends in Smokeless Tobacco Sales in the United States: 2011-2019, 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Banning Menthol Cigarettes: A Social Justice Issue Long Overdue, 2020, Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Assessment of Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarette Consumption in the US, 2000 to 2018, 2020, JAMA Network Open

Frequent co-authors in their work include Ollie Ganz, Olivia A Wackowski, Mary Hrywna, Michelle T. Bover Manderski, and Andrea C. Villanti, demonstrating ongoing collaborative efforts within their field.

The primary publication venues for their work include:

  • Tobacco Control
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Preventive Medicine Reports

The areas of study emphasize the intersection of medicine and public health with a strong orientation toward investigating tobacco-related health behaviors and policies, as well as the sociological dimensions linked to smoking and consumer behavior. Their contributions span studies on tobacco product market trends, regulatory issues such as menthol cigarette bans, and analyses related to the usage patterns of nicotine products across different populations.

Best Publications

  • Patterns of Electronic Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States.

    Cristine D. Delnevo;Daniel P. Giovenco;Michael B. Steinberg;Andrea C. Villanti

  • Electronic cigarette use among US adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014

    Blair N. Coleman;Brian Rostron;Sarah E. Johnson;Bridget K. Ambrose

  • Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004–2014

    Andrea C Villanti;Paul D Mowery;Cristine D Delnevo;Raymond S Niaura;Raymond S Niaura

  • Preference for flavoured cigar brands among youth, young adults and adults in the USA

    Cristine D Delnevo;Daniel P Giovenco;Bridget K Ambrose;Catherine G Corey

  • Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005-2011.

    Cristine D Delnevo;Olivia A Wackowski;Daniel P Giovenco;Michelle T Bover Manderski

  • Transitions in electronic cigarette use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015).

    Blair Coleman;Brian Rostron;Sarah E. Johnson;Alexander Persoskie

  • Factors associated with e-cigarette use: a national population survey of current and former smokers.

    Daniel P. Giovenco;M. Jane Lewis;Cristine D. Delnevo

  • Prevalence of population smoking cessation by electronic cigarette use status in a national sample of recent smokers.

    Daniel P. Giovenco;Cristine D. Delnevo

  • Tobacco use among those with serious psychological distress: results from the national survey of drug use and health, 2002.

    Brett T. Hagman;Cristine D. Delnevo;Mary Hrywna;Jill M. Williams

  • E-Cigarette Market Trends in Traditional U.S. Retail Channels, 2012–2013

    Daniel P. Giovenco;David Hammond;Catherine G. Corey;Bridget K. Ambrose

  • Association of Flavored Tobacco Use With Tobacco Initiation and Subsequent Use Among US Youth and Adults, 2013-2015.

    Andrea C. Villanti;Amanda L. Johnson;Allison M. Glasser;Shyanika W. Rose

  • US Adult Cigar Smoking Patterns, Purchasing Behaviors, and Reasons for Use According to Cigar Type: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014

    Catherine G Corey;Enver Holder-Hayes;Anh B Nguyen;Cristine D Delnevo

  • Young Adults’ Risk Perceptions of Various Tobacco Products Relative to Cigarettes: Results From the National Young Adult Health Survey

    Olivia A. Wackowski;Cristine D. Delnevo

  • Dispelling myths about gender differences in smoking cessation: population data from the USA, Canada and Britain

    Martin J Jarvis;Joanna E Cohen;Joanna E Cohen;Cristine D Delnevo;Gary A Giovino

  • Smoking-cessation prevalence among U.S. smokers of menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes.

    Cristine D. Delnevo;Daniel A. Gundersen;Mary Hrywna;Sandra E. Echeverria

  • Association Between Electronic Cigarette Marketing Near Schools and E-cigarette Use Among Youth

    Daniel P. Giovenco;Myriam Casseus;Dustin T. Duncan;Elliot J. Coups

  • Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.

    Cristine D Delnevo;Diane J Abatemarco;Michael B Steinberg

  • Changes in the Mass-merchandise Cigar Market since the Tobacco Control Act.

    Cristine D Delnevo;Daniel P Giovenco;Erin J Miller Lo

  • Little filtered cigar, cigarillo, and premium cigar smoking among adults--United States, 2012-2013.

    Catherine G. Corey;Brian A. King;Blair N. Coleman;Cristine D. Delnevo

  • Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic III: The host: data sources and methodological challenges.

    Cristine D. Delnevo;Ursula E. Bauer

  • Seven-year patterns in US cigar use epidemiology among young adults aged 18–25 years: A focus on race/ethnicity and brand

    Jennifer M. Cullen;Paul Mowery;Cristine D. Delnevo;Jane A. Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea C. Villanti
Andrea C. Villanti Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Cassandra A. Stanton
Cassandra A. Stanton Westat (United States)
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University
Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
Andrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland Roswell Park Cancer Institute
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Renee D. Goodwin
Renee D. Goodwin City University of New York
Kevin P. Conway
Kevin P. Conway National Institute on Drug Abuse
David Hammond
David Hammond University of Waterloo
Wilson M. Compton
Wilson M. Compton National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career options, especially as online education makes these fields more accessible. For those interested in understanding human behavior, pursuing an online degree in psychology can be a flexible starting point with a vast range of job outcomes in counseling, research, and education.

If your goal is to support individuals and communities, you might consider a masters in social work, now available through online programs that are designed to be accessible and practical. Graduates often pursue roles in social services, healthcare, and nonprofit organizations.

Aspiring clinicians can look into further specialization. For those interested in clinical psychology, accredited psyd online programs can provide advanced training for practitioner roles. Alternatively, an online marriage and family therapy programs offer focused pathways to become licensed therapists addressing relationships and family dynamics.

Each of these online options provides flexible learning, but it’s vital to ensure programs meet accreditation requirements and state-specific licensing rules for your intended career path.

Best Scientists Citing Cristine D. Delnevo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles