World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 89 210 177 13 13 426 27714

David Hammond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Hammond between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Hammond published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 29.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2022. 103 of the 658 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2022. 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 55 publications 2021: 49 publications 2022: 63 publications 2023: 54 publications 2024: 48 publications 2025: 55 publications
2004 2025

658 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Hammond: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 6
2005 5
2006 15
2007 6
2008 12
2009 11
2010 16
2011 19
2012 17
2013 23
2014 24
2015 35
2016 33
2017 20
2018 48
2019 44
2020 55
2021 49
2022 63
2023 54
2024 48
2025 55
Total 658
Download as CSV

David Hammond publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Hammond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 424–433 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 426 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29 426
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David Hammond D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Hammond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7 89
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

David Hammond is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada and specializes in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their research outputs span several subfields including Pharmacology, Physiology, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions.

The scientific work conducted by David Hammond covers a variety of topics, with a notable emphasis on:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The frequent publication venues where David Hammond's research appears include:

  • Tobacco Control
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Addiction
  • Public Health Nutrition

In collaboration with other researchers, David Hammond has frequently worked with co-authors such as Lana Vanderlee, Christine M. White, Elle Wadsworth, James F. Thrasher, and Jessica L. Reid, each contributing to a substantial number of shared publications.

Recent papers highlight key contributions by David Hammond in the domain of cannabis policy and public health. Noteworthy publications include:

  • "Evaluating the impacts of cannabis legalization: The International Cannabis Policy Study" (2020), International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "Prevalence and forms of cannabis use in legal vs. illegal recreational cannabis markets" (2020), International Journal of Drug Policy
  • "The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling on Consumer Behavior and Product Reformulation" (2021), Annual Review of Nutrition
  • "Use of Online Food Delivery Services to Order Food Prepared Away-From-Home and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis" (2020), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Availability, retail price and potency of legal and illegal cannabis in Canada after recreational cannabis legalisation" (2020), Drug and Alcohol Review

Best Publications

  • Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey

    Sarah E. Adkison;Richard J. O'Connor;Maansi Bansal-Travers;Andrew Hyland

  • Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    D Hammond;G T Fong;A McNeill;R Borland

  • Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey

    G T Fong;A Hyland;R Borland;D Hammond

  • Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the international tobacco control four country study.

    David Hammond;Geoffrey T. Fong;Ron Borland;K. Michael Cummings

  • The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project

    G T Fong;K M Cummings;R Borland;G Hastings

  • Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey.

    Jessica L. Reid;David Hammond;Christian Boudreau;Geoffrey T. Fong

  • Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years

    R Borland;N Wilson;G T Fong;D Hammond

  • Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    Mary E. Thompson;G. T. Fong;D. Hammond;C. Boudreau

  • How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey.

    Ron Borland;Hua-Hie Yong;Nick Wilson;Geoffrey T. Fong;Geoffrey T. Fong

  • Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers.

    Unknown

  • The COMPASS study: a longitudinal hierarchical research platform for evaluating natural experiments related to changes in school-level programs, policies and built environment resources

    Scott T Leatherdale;K Stephen Brown;Valerie Carson;Ruth A Childs

  • Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.

    David Hammond;Jessica L Reid;Vicki L Rynard;Geoffrey T Fong;Geoffrey T Fong

  • The Impact of Cigarette Pack Design, Descriptors, and Warning Labels on Risk Perception in the U.S.

    Maansi Bansal-Travers;David Hammond;Philip Smith;K. Michael Cummings

  • Tobacco Denormalization and Industry Beliefs Among Smokers from Four Countries

    David Hammond;Geoffrey T. Fong;Mark P. Zanna;James F. Thrasher

  • The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

    Geoffrey T. Fong;David Hammond;Fritz L. Laux;Mark P. Zanna

  • Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

    M Siahpush;A McNeill;D Hammond;G T Fong

  • The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings

    Geoffrey T Fong;David Hammond;Sara C Hitchman

  • Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study

    David Hammond;Geoffrey T. Fong;K. Michael Cummings;Andrew Hyland

  • Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check

    David T Levy;Kenneth E Warner;K Michael Cummings;David Hammond

  • Do smokers know how to quit? Knowledge and perceived effectiveness of cessation assistance as predictors of cessation behaviour.

    D. Hammond;P. W. McDonald;P. W. McDonald;G. T. Fong;R. Borland

  • Electronic cigarette use and smoking initiation among youth: a longitudinal cohort study.

    David Hammond;Jessica L. Reid;Adam G. Cole;Scott T. Leatherdale

  • Awareness, Trial, and Current Use of Electronic Cigarettes in 10 Countries: Findings from the ITC Project

    Shannon Gravely;Geoffrey Fong;K. Cummings;Mi Yan

  • The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents' Choices.

    Christina A Roberto;Diandra Wong;Aviva Musicus;David Hammond

  • Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities.

    David Hammond;James Thrasher;Jessica L. Reid;Pete Driezen

  • Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: A comparison between Mexico and Canada

    James F Thrasher;David Hammond;Geoffrey T Fong;Edna Arillo-Santillán

  • Smokers' beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: findings from the ITC collaboration.

    Richard J O'Connor;Ann McNeill;Ron Borland;David Hammond

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong University of Waterloo
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
James F. Thrasher
James F. Thrasher University of South Carolina
Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
Scott T. Leatherdale
Scott T. Leatherdale University of Waterloo
Andrew Hyland
Andrew Hyland Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Crawford Moodie
Crawford Moodie University of Stirling
Tim Stockwell
Tim Stockwell University of Victoria
Thomas K. Greenfield
Thomas K. Greenfield Alcohol Research Group

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are a variety of flexible online degrees to help you reach your goals. For those interested in clinical psychology or counseling, an online psyd program provides advanced training to prepare for licensure as a psychologist.

Looking for a quicker route? There are accelerated mft programs that can help you become a licensed marriage and family therapist in less time, letting you start your career sooner.

For students seeking affordability, consider a masters in psychology online cheap program. These programs offer flexibility and cost savings, making advanced education accessible to a wider range of learners.

If your aspirations include leadership roles in education, enrolling in edd programs can quickly prepare you for positions such as educational administrators, policymakers, or higher education faculty.

Exploring these online degree options broadens your career pathways, whether your interests lie in clinical work, counseling, education, or research within the field of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing David Hammond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles